Whose Inflation Is It?

Financial FAQs

“Still, despite multiple offsetting drivers, the tariff shock is further dimming already lackluster growth prospects. We expect a slowdown in the second half of this year, with only a partial recovery in 2026, and, compared to last October’s projections, inflation is expected to be persistently higher. Even in the United States, growth is weaker and inflation higher than we projected last year—hallmarks of a negative supply shock.” IMF Global Economic Outlook 2025

FREDcpi

No one wants to admit who is responsible for the sharp rise in consumer prices since April 2. Democrats and the Biden administration had worked to bring the Consumer Price Index (CPI) portrayed in the above graph down to 2.3% from its high of 9% that occurred in 2023 from the COVID-19 pandemic.

But it began to rise again in this April at the same time that Trump announced retaliatory tariffs on the rest of the world. Republicans say the inflation was caused by Biden’s massive government spending programs that sped up the COVID-19 pandemic recovery.

Most economists maintain that the inflation spike was caused in large part because of the supply shortages during the pandemic. President Trump’s tariff war on imports from the rest of the world that he announced on April 2 exacerbated the product shortages as exporters scrambled to find cheaper supply routes to avoid the higher tariffs.

Add to this the looming worker shortage from tighter immigration policies that are shrinking the foreign-born labor supply—another negative supply shock on top of that from tariffs—that is beginning to affect labor productivity.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its latest Global Economic Outlook report says both the tariffs and a looming worker shortage are “hallmarks of a negative supply shock” that will eventually slow down world economic growth.

China is now restricting the export of rare earth minerals, for which Trump has threatened to add an additional 100 percent tariff on China’s exports to US. And the government shutdown will only make things worse in closing down the statistical departments that tell us where we are and might be in six months.

“Overall, despite a steady first half, the outlook remains fragile, and risks remain tilted to the downside,” reports the IMF. “The main risk is that tariffs may increase further from renewed and unresolved trade tensions, which, coupled with supply chain disruptions, could lower global output by 0.3 percent next year. Apart from this, four simmering downside risks are especially worrying.”

What are they? U.S. financial markets are overinvested in AI with little to show for it, while AI is already causing white-collar layoffs, exacerbating the job losses incurred by the ICE roundup of undocumented immigrants.

And we have a record $39 trillion federal debt weighing on the credit markets that is competing with the private capital needed for new plants and equipment investment.

The Trump administration is vainly attempting to equate the record tariff rates, now at Great Depression levels, let us not forget, with some promised domestic industrial revival.

And Trump wants an easy money Federal Reserve to help grease its wheels. How do you think interest rates and inflation will respond to easier credit? The same way inflation and interest rates responded to Joe Biden’s New, New Deal?

We can’t borrow our way out of this debt mess with tax cuts for the wealthiest.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen