How Do We Repair Our Economy?

Financial FAQs

“The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining. [State of the Union Address January 11 1962]” President John F Kennedy

 

President Kennedy’s maxim at his 1962 State of the Union address—the almost universal truth that the time to ‘repair’ our economy is when times are good—may seem dated today. At one time it was possible, but not for everyone today.

We have record federal debt fueled by a succession of economic blows—sequential tax cuts that didn’t pay for themselves, recessions, the COVID-19 pandemic, high tariffs, and several wars over the past decades.

And foreign investors are fleeing U.S. government bond markets that literally finance one-quarter of our federal debt because of it, driving up interest rates. Our ballooning federal debt is fast crowding out other government spending; maybe even reducing social security benefits in about 10 years.

Now is the time to repair our economic ‘roof’ while times are good. We have soaring financial markets and 3% annual GDP growth rates that have powered economic growth of late to pay down the soaring federal debt that is already at World War II levels as a percentage of our Gross Domestic Product.

Alas, there is no agreement on how to repair our debt problem. This is while another war is creating a 1970’s-style stagflation that will add $trillions more to the deficit.

International Energy Agency (IEA) officials, such as Fatih Birol, say the current Iran crisis is more severe than the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979, and the 2022 Ukraine-war shock, combined.

And businesses are not hiring new workers because of the economic uncertainty. It is fostering what has been called “The Great Hesitation” by the Wall Street Journal.

The WSJ cited the Baker, Bloom and Davis Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, a widely watched measure of policy-related uncertainty, that has surged to levels “typically seen during situations like the 2008 financial crisis (i.e., Great Recession) and the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic.”

Republicans aren’t showing much concern about the expanded deficit on their watch. Firstly, the highest tariff taxes since 1930 at the onset of the Great Depression has sharply raised every day prices. And the Trump administration’s immigrant shutdown is depriving the U.S. economy of enough new workers to replenish our labor force.

This is in part because Trump and the Republican Party have been unable to rein in the blatant racism of its Christian Nationalists’ policy that has branded almost all immigrant as undesirables. It has brought immigration to a trickle that once averaged one million entrants per year.

Yet immigrants have literally been the life blood of our economy and seed of economic growth. Stanford Business School studies have shown that immigrants represent nearly a quarter of the U.S. workforce in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and more than a quarter of the nation’s Nobel Prize winners.

President Clinton was able to create actual budget surpluses in his last four years—from 1996-2000—by negotiating with congress to limit government spending on the military as well, until GW Bush busted the federal budget once again with Republican tax cuts while borrowing $trillions more to fight his wars on terror after the 9/11 attack.

How naïve President Kennedy sounds today when he said in 1962, “Members of the Congress, the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress. We are all trustees for the American people, custodians of the American heritage.”

We need to repair more than the roof to survive as a democracy. But we must first realize we live under the same roof.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Republican Party's Bully Capitalism

 Popular Economics Weekly

“Twice as many Americans believe their financial security is getting worse than better, according to an exclusive new poll conducted for the Guardian, and they are increasingly blaming the White House.” The Guardian

Graph: Last Tech Age

President Trump gave himself “A plus plus-plus-plus-plus-plus” grade on the U.S. economy in a recent interview with Politico cited by The Guardian. That Trump can perpetuate such an obvious lie that contradicts what most Americans feel is an example of bully capitalism at large, my term for what economists have termed is ‘late-stage’ capitalism that has been adopted by the Republican Party, a phase of capitalism marked by extreme wealth inequality and corporate dominance in nearly all aspects of life.

Historian Heather Cox Richardson in her Substack blog Letters From an American states that such corporate dominance is the result of at least $50 trillion in income and assets that has been transferred from the bottom 90% to the top 1% of Americans between 1975 and 2020.

It was done via a succession of Republican administration tax cuts and recessions that grew U.S. federal debt to its current record $39 trillion.

Americans now have the worst income inequality in the developed world as measured by various sources, especially the CIA’s World Factbook. In fact, our income inequality is at the level of developing countries like Mozambique.

The recent Guardian/Harris poll makes clear Trump’s big lie attempts to deny what has really happened since the 1970s that most Americans are seeing with their own eyes.

Democrats are almost twice as likely as Republicans to say their financial security is getting worse – 52% versus 27%. Add in 54 percent of Independents believe the same, who are usually the swing voters that determine elections, said the poll.

And 69 percent of Democrats and 58 percent of Independents believe we are already in a recession.

Why when the stock indexes are at record highs? One hint is that bully capitalism has hit women particularly hard. Nearly two-thirds of women (62%) believe the U.S. is in a recession, +12% from February, says the Harris poll, and women, the primary caretakers of children, are the first to see their suffering from the cuts in social welfare benefits such as SNAP and childcare programs by Republicans.

Trump and Republicans have boosted bully capitalism to a new high by showing their blatant lawlessness and cruelty, such as the ICE agents shooting citizens and non-citizens alike. The good news is that Americans can now see with their own eyes the blatant disregard for human suffering, and it has begun to sway the American public in recent elections.

The biggest lie of all perpetuated by Republicans is that “Government is the problem”, that bully capitalism made things better for everyone. No, the American government was formed to protect all Americans, not just the privileged few.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

A Better Economy For Whom?

 Popular Economics Weekly

“…in going from the Biden Administration to the Trump Administration, we have traded an economy that disproportionately benefited low-income workers to one that disproportionately benefits the well-off (particularly those who own a lot of stocks).” Paul Krugman

FREDgdp

Second and Third quarter Gross Domestic Product growth surged (see graph), mainly due to a jump in consumer spending as shoppers rushed to get ahead of the holiday and rising prices.

But this will only confuse the real economic picture. The third quarter is June to September, before the government shutdown. And it didn’t benefit everyone in this K-shaped economy. Some economists are predicting a coming slowdown and maybe recession next year, despite the good news.

That’s in part because fifty percent of the consumer spending is by 10 percent of American shoppers today, according to Moody’s economist Mark Zandi. Incomes of the middle and low-income earners have lost ground from the higher inflation that has reduced their spending power.

Zandi estimates 22 states plus the District of Columbia are now experiencing enough persistent economic weakness from the federal job cuts and shrinking job market that their economies are close to or in recession, mostly in the North and East states. But even New York and California’s economies have slowed and if they follow the trajectory of the 22 states would tip us into an outright recession, says Zandi.

It's hard to equate this prognosis with the Q3 burst in GDP. “Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 4.3 percent in the third quarter of 2025 (July, August, and September), according to the initial estimate released by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the second quarter, real GDP increased 3.8 percent.” BEA

That’s why the bulk of the consumers are spending most on necessities such as healthcare, insurance, clothing, car repairs, gas, housing and utilities. And the prices of most of these goods and services have consumers complaining big time.

The alarm bells are ringing that the worse is yet to come, in other words, if we look under the hood of Chevy, as well as Mercedes owners. With record household debt and a sharply reduced workforce due to government firings and immigrant deportations, the K-gap will only grow worse between the well-off and low-income workers from the rising inflation.

The price index for gross domestic (GDP) purchases increased 3.4 percent in the third quarter, compared with an increase of 2.0 percent in the second quarter.

The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index that the Fed uses to gauge inflation also increased 2.8 percent, compared with an increase of 2.1 percent in Q2.

The rising cost of living is also hurting consumer confidence, per the Conference Board’s confidence index; another danger sign. “Consumer confidence weakened for a fifth consecutive month as perceptions of business conditions were negative, and apprehensions about jobs and income deepened,” according to the Conference Board.

Americans blamed their unease on “prices and inflation, tariffs and trade, and politics,” said Dana Peterson, chief economist at the Conference Board.

That is why largest share of consumers—those anticipating that recession is “somewhat likely”—grew again and the small percentage stating that the US is “already in one” crept higher, said Peterson.

Yet the stock indexes are at record highs and the Wall Street rally continues in the hope that AI investments will boost production and bring down the prices of goods and services. Oh goody for the oligarchs!

Many of the low-income workers have only themselves to blame in voting for a man that never intended to improve the lives of workers. His record of bankruptcies to avoid paying investors and workers was well-known before Trump’s first term, so why again?

This administration will soon find out what that means when the other 80 to 90 percent of working Americans realize they have been left behind in this recovery. Actually, the polls are showing maybe they already know.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Equality Is Good For Everyone!

Answering Kennedy’s Call

“And on the tax front, it’s time for rich people like me to pay more.” Mitt Romney

Getty/Bettmann

This quote from a recent NYTimes Mitt Romney Op-ed is my Christmas message: Equal opportunity hasn’t been available to many Americans, even though it is part of the American Dream—America is the land of opportunity that is taught in schools and heard by immigrants.

Why? Because it’s a larger economic truth that not all Americans have accepted. Equality is good for everyone. It should be self-evident, a statement of common sense. The more equality of opportunity among us, the more we can better ourselves, become more productive citizens, which in turn increases our national wealth (and lowers budget deficits).

It was certainly the dream of immigrants, such as my mother, a British citizen born in Jamaica.

But there are times such as today when many Americans don’t believe it is possible, which is why we are living in another Gilded Age with the worst income inequality of the developed world. It is on a par with developing countries in Africa and has been the major cause of recessions and the Great Depression.

Many have bought the counter narrative by those that don’t like equality, such as Donald Trump and his MAGA supporters, part of the privileged few at the top of the income ladder who want us to believe they are the most qualified to create greater wealth for the rest of us.

This Gilded Age was formed like the last Gilded Age of President William McKinley, from a concentration of power among the wealthiest oligarchs. Then it was monopolies in such as the newly created railroad and oil industries.

Today, it is small government policies of Donald Trump that mirror the trickle-down economic policies of President Reagan because enough Americans believed it, believed government was the problem and cutting taxes the solution, believed that equality is not good for everyone because we live in a zero-sum world with limited resources. What is given to one must be taken from another.

The conservative position espoused by 1970s Economist Arthur Okun, for instance, was that greater equality meant less market efficiencies to produce and so fewer incentives for greater wealth, since leveling the playing field meant leveling out the opportunity for large profits.

But that has never been the case. There has always been copious evidence that the opposite is true; that overly large profits have led to diminished household wealth and breakup of communities.

One can measure inequality with such as the CIA’s World Factbook that ranks inequality among nations. Those with the greatest equality also have less violence, greater freedoms, greater health, and guaranteed vacations!

Richard Wilkinson’s TEDx lecture and book with Kate Pickett, “The Spirit Level” is one of the best studies of the dire effects of income inequality on the quality of life. The most important factor, and a sign of dire consequences when inequality has approached the level of the Great Depression, are the US violent crime and incarceration rates, which Wilkinson discusses at length.

The U.S. is by far the most violent country in the world—worse than any other developed country with the highest incarceration rates. Efforts to reverse such inequality have begun on the local levels, even if congressional conservatives have blocked raising the miniscule national minimum wage of $7.25 per hour that was last set in 2009.

It is worth just $5 per hour today whereas blue states like California and Connecticut have raised their minimum wage to $16.90 per hour in line with rising livings costs.

And there is an increasing awareness of the income disparities, such as the fact that corporate CEOs now earn more than 300 times the income of their employees, and certain hedge fund managers have reported an annual income of $1 billion.

The Center for American Progress launched the Washington Center For Equitable Growth, which aims to deepen the economic critique of inequality. It was set up by Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez, among others, who is known with his partner Thomas Piketty as the first economists to historically research the history of income distribution over the past 100 years.

The mission statement of the Center explains why it is needed:

“New research suggests that growing inequality in the United States may have broad social and economic effects — by reducing stable demand for goods and services, dampening entrepreneurialism, undermining the inclusiveness and responsiveness of political and economic institutions, limiting access to education, and stunting individual development. Yet our understanding of how these mechanisms interact with the broader economy is limited.”

Mitt Romney’s Op-ed has voiced one of the major issues confronting Americans today—how to fix the overwhelming federal debt load that threatens the ‘full faith and credit’ of the U.S. government.

“The largest source of additional tax revenues is also probably the most compelling for the fairness and social stability. Some call it closing a tax code loophole but the term “loopholes” grossly understates their scale. “Caverns” or “caves” would be more fitting,” said Romney

Donald Trump’s flailing attempts to use higher tariffs to pay down federal debt, when it is in fact another tax on all Americans, is maybe the most important reason to follow Mitt Romney’s advice.

Taxing the wealthiest that haven’t been “paying their fair share”—including Donald Trump’s billionaire supporters, would close one of the largest loopholes that is endangering the U.S. economy, as Senator Bernie Sanders continually reminds us.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Still Flying Blind--Part II

 Financial FAQs

“Hiring has been choppy of late as employers weather cautious consumers and an uncertain macroeconomic environment. And while November's slowdown was broad-based, it was led by a pullback among small businesses.” ADP

wallpaperaccess.com

We know why consumer confidence has plunged to a new post-pandemic low. We have no news of current economic conditions to guide consumers and investors, much less what may happen next, so the U.S. economy is still flying blind.

The November unemployment report comes out on December 16, for instance, (skipping October’s report) after the Fed’s FOMC meet that decides whether another rate cut is appropriate, so we have only the ‘unofficial’ ADP private payrolls report on employment that showed -32,000 private payrolls were lost in November.

The goods sector of the U.S. economy, including Construction and Manufacturing, lost -19,000 jobs. The service sector lost -12,000 overall, though Education, Health and Leisure activities added +46,000 jobs in the sector.

September’s last ‘official’ unemployment report with 119,000 payroll jobs was ok, but that was before the government lock down. And the U.S. economy had averaged just 38,600 new jobs since April and the tariff announcements.

Dr. Nela Richardson Chief Economist, ADP said it best in the survey. Small businesses aren’t hiring because of the uncertain tariffs, since some 90 percent of small businesses import their products that are sold in the U.S.

September retail sales also reported before the shutdown. Retail sales are growing more dependent on a smaller group of consumers. The top 10% of earners in the U.S. accounted for nearly 50% of spending in the second quarter, the highest level it’s been since this data first started being collected in 1989, according to Moody’s Analytics.

And the poor ISM manufacturing index numbers show the manufacturing sector has been contracting for the past nine months.

“A closely followed manufacturing index fell to a four-month low of 48.2% in November from 48.7% in the prior month, the Institute for Supply Management said Monday. Any number below 50% signals contraction,.” MarketWatch

The Federal Reserve will probably lower interest rates another -0.25%, but next year is a rate tossup because of the inflation worries, as almost no tariff agreements have been ratified by congress and signed.

We still have a lot of postponed economic data from the government shutdown, in other words, such as personal consumption and spending data (PCE) that the Fed prefers to measure inflation. We know that annual consumer CPI inflation had jumped to 3% in September, also before the shutdown, and will probably go higher as the tariff costs are passed on to consumers and businesses.

It’s obvious that we are living in uncertain times, and the old Republican playbook of tax cuts combined with DOGE and Project 25 slashing of government benefits are hurting the 90 percent of Americans still living paycheck to paycheck, as I’ve said.

Is that enough to cause a recession, in spite of the stock market’s boost supporting the top 10 percent of Americans that can still afford more than the basic necessities?

It won’t take much to tip US into a recession. The data we need to predict the future will eventually come out. Then we will know if not only the manufacturing sector is contracting—e.g., employment, capital expenditures, and personal income—which are the other major components that determine whether we are in a recession.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

What is Worrying Consumers?

 Financial FAQs

 “Consumer confidence tumbled in November to its second lowest level since April after moving sideways for several months,” said Dana M Peterson, Chief Economist, The Conference Board. “All five components of the overall index flagged or remained weak.”

Conference Board

Why are consumers worrying so much? Maybe they don’t like government shutdowns? Or, maybe it’s because higher prices and the tariffs are hurting small businesses that depend on imported goods? Or, there are fewer available jobs. Actually, it’s all of the above per the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Survey.

“Consumers’ write-in responses pertaining to factors affecting the economy continued to be led by references to prices and inflation, tariffs and trade, and politics, with increased mentions of the federal government shutdown.”

It’s also becoming obvious that consumers don’t like bully behavior, such as Republicans ramming through the continuing budget resolution without Democrats’ input.

Republicans were in fact attempting to take down Obamacare (ACA) once again by not including the subsidies in the continuing resolution that made it available for middle and low-income folk, I said last week.

Retail sales data finally released for September showed consumers were still shopping and dining out, but not as much.

So what will happen now? This was all before the shutdown. My guesstimate with anecdotal evidence from the likes of Walmart, Target, et. al., is that the more affluent consumers that own homes and stocks will come storming out of the gates after the shutdown and maybe party through the holidays. Government workers will be receiving extra paydays, for instance—i.e., weeks of backpay.

Doug McMillon, Walmart’s outgoing chief executive, cited by MarketWatch, said on the chain’s earnings call that middle-and-upper-income households drove growth in the U.S. during the third quarter. He also said that “lower-income families have been under additional pressure of late.”

And the financial markets have been rallying as it looks like the Fed will cut rates once again in December. Consumers will rally as well as they race to borrow and purchase during the holidays. That’s because polls say they expect inflation to surge over the next year when things will become more expensive.

And Trump has grown wilier with his tariff pronouncements, not touting their benefits so loudly, for instance, which was alarming consumers, while finally admitting that tariffs have been raising prices. His MAGA followers are suffering the most. He must have finally looked at his poor poll numbers that are even lower than during his first term.

The other unspoken shoe to drop that affects consumers is the shrinking job market. ADP payrolls reports that just +42,000 private payrolls were added in October. Trade, Transportation, Education and Healthcare added the most jobs. But -51,000 jobs were lost in other sectors such as Information and Information and business services.

“Private employers added jobs in October for the first time since July, but hiring was modest relative to what we reported earlier this year. Meanwhile, pay growth has been largely flat for more than a year, indicating that shifts in supply and demand are balanced,” said Dr. Nela Richardson, Chief Economist

It’s pretty obvious that we are living in uncertain times, and the old Republican playbook of tax cuts combined with DOGE and Project 25 slashing of government benefits isn’t yet hurting the 10 percent of consumers that have assets, but that leaves 90 percent of Americans still living paycheck to paycheck.

What will happen to them?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

U.S. Economy Is Freezing!

 Popular Economics Weekly

“…while the economy is growing thanks to AI spending, it’s a K-shaped expansion: People who were already affluent are becoming more so, but the less well-off are under severe pressure. For example, there are clear signs that middle-to-low income consumers are struggling: car loan and credit card delinquencies are rising, and grocers report that shoppers are buying cheaper varieties of food. At the same time, the affluent are spending freely: the top 10% of the income distribution now accounts for nearly half of all consumer spending.” Paul Krugman

PBS.org

This was the wrong season for President Trump’s Republicans to freeze Democrats out of the just passed continuing resolution or demolish the East Wing. We already have a record fall freeze hitting the Midwest and southern states.

Americans already feeling the freeze is also a good way to describe the Democrats landslide victories in the November elections. The record government shutdown put the U.S. economy on pause, but in fact much of the damage was already done, says Nobel Laureat Paul Krugman, just as Trump seemed oblivious to the timing of the damage being done to the White House,.

Republicans had been losing in the popularity polls this year because they chose to ignore the signs. So they believed that flying blind by keeping the federal government closed without official economic data on employment and inflation was the better option than knowing the truth.

But there are other data to fill the government void in data collecting that affect how consumers behave. The ADP, for instance, a private sector payment provider said private-sector employers shed an average of 11,250 jobs a week in the four weeks ending Oct. 25.

This hit the “middle-to-low income” consumers particularly hard that Krugman is talking about. What about inflation?

Ordinary grocery prices are climbing, forcing consumers to shop for “cheaper varieties of food.” Grocery prices have risen 18.2 percent since January 2022, making a $100 grocery bill approximately $118 today, per CBS News.

And President Trump is flailing in his attempt to mask the damage his tariff war is causing. Overall consumer inflation is stuck at 3 percent in large part because of the tariffs, so he wants to offer $2,000 rebates to consumers while the Fed is cutting interest rates. This would cost more than the import taxes he has already collected, enlarging the federal debt that has ballooned from his Big Beautiful Bill tax cuts.

And his proposed cuts to legal immigration from the longer term, historical average of one million to 7500 annually, will continue to shrink the workforce, even the number of H-1B work visas for highly qualified workers that are badly needed in the tech sector.

All of this will continue to damage economic growth at a time when worldwide economic growth is being affected by the chaos Trump has generated in tearing up existing foreign trade agreements.

No economy can tolerate such uncertain weather over the longer term. Hence investment decisions remain frozen while consumers find shelter for the coming economic winter. How severe will it be?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Are We Flying Blind?

 Popular Economics Weekly

"The United States economy is like a poker game where the chips have become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, and where the other fellows can stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit runs out the game will stop." Marriner Eccles

 

wallpaperaccess.com

The famous above quote by Roosevelt’s Federal Reserve Chairman, Marriner Eccles on what he believed caused the Great Depression is a warning that the U.S. economy is now flying blind during this government shutdown.

Eccles should know. He guided Federal Reserve policy during the Great Depression that implemented the New Deal.

Economic downturns occur when consumers are tapped out and begin to borrow more than they spend. It is the reason that retail sales and consumer confidence surveys are important signs of whether consumers will continue to shop, or drop, as the saying goes.

And given the economic chaos being sown by the Trump administration during what looks like a record government shutdown, we don’t have any official data being released on when it might happen and what it will look like. So we are flying blind.

There are past recessions that economists look at; the Dot-com bubble that burst in 2001 from over investment in fiber optics that didn’t pan out immediately because it took years for the Internet to be adopted. Now there is over-investment in AI that could follow the same path as the so-called Dot-com recession.

And the Great Depression was largely due to the Herbert Hoover administration allowing tariff rates to rise to unacceptable levels that choked off foreign trade on which many countries, including America, relied on.

There was also the too easy credit conditions of the “Roaring Twenties” that weren’t regulated yet, which allowed the American public to borrow and invest in the stock market for the first time. The October 1929 “Black Friday” market crash followed that precipitated the Great Depression.

So we can take our pick: Trump’s too high tariffs, or too little market regulation allowing shadow lending markets (or junk bonds) to flourish outside of regulated lending channels might cause the next downturn.

Trump’s newest Federal Reserve pick, and former chief economic advisor, Stephen Miran, is even sounding the alarm in calling for larger Federal Reserve rate cuts.

“If you keep policy this tight for a long period of time, then you run the risk that monetary policy itself is inducing a recession,” Miran said in a recent interview cited by the NYTimes.

Another danger sign is The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) latest report that American manufacturers contracted for the eighth month in a row with no end in sight because of the Trump administration tariffs, reports MarketWatch, which cited several anecdotes in the ISM Manufacturing report.

“Business continues to be severely depressed. Profits are down and extreme taxes (tariffs) are being shouldered by all companies in our space,” said one executive at a maker of transportation equipment.

“Steel tariffs are killing us,” another manufacturer told ISM.

“The tariffs are still causing issues with imported goods into the U.S.,” an executive at a chemical maker said. “The inflation issues continue.”

The closely followed manufacturing index slipped to 48.7% in October from 49.1% in the prior month, the Institute for Supply Management said Monday. Any number below 50% signals contraction.

I’ve already reported that consumers are feeling less confident in the University of Michigan Sentiment survey.

“Consumers continue to express frustration over the persistence of high prices, with 44% spontaneously mentioning that high prices are eroding their personal finances, the highest reading in a year. Interviews this month highlight the fact that consumers feel pressure both from the prospect of higher inflation as well as the risk of weaker labor markets,” said Survey Director Joanne Hsu

The real danger is that we are gleaning all these signs from industry reports outside of the ‘official’ government reports on employment, inflation, and consumer spending just before the holidays.

So, the U.S. economy is flying blind without the usual flight data that tells us where we are headed. Is there a soft landing, or crash landing ahead?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Will Fed Give Up the Inflation Fight?

 Financial FAQs

 “Consumers continue to express frustration over the persistence of high prices, with 44% spontaneously mentioning that high prices are eroding their personal finances, the highest reading in a year.” University of Michigan Sentiment Survey

FREDcpi

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said at his most recent press conference (after the Fed’s October FOMC meet) that they were still committed to achieving a 2 percent inflation target.

Why ? Because inflation is still too high and Chair Powell, et. al., see too much uncertainty ahead. That’s no surprise given the government shutdown, and continuing tariff wars.

The last period of moderate inflation was the decade after the Great Recession, as seen in the Fred Consumer Price Index chart (large gray bar is GR)—that ended with the COVID-19 pandemic. It was during the Obama administration when regulations were created that required banks to play by the rules and hold more capital.

But what if the rules are changed again that allow higher inflation and fewer regulations that the Trump administration says it wants?

The moderate inflation ended because of the COVID-19 pandemic when massive liquidity was injected into the economy during the first Trump and Biden administrations to speed up the recovery. Inflation jumped to a high of 9 percent before declining until the retaliatory tariffs, rising again to its current 3%.

So now there is growing doubt that the Fed can maintain the 2 percent inflation target, since the newest members of the Fed Governors that vote on interest rates were Trump-appointed. And a Trump pick will become the new Federal Reserve Chair next year.

This is while President Trump has been calling for lower interest rates, which with higher tariffs would lead to higher inflation.

Trump claims that won’t happen even though he has raised tariffs to Taft-Hartley, Great Depression levels (thus raising import prices), has raised federal debt because of his Big Beautiful Tax Bill, and is loosening financial regulations that limit market speculation (e.g., in Bitcoin).

Add all this to the chaos generated by a White House that almost daily revises its decisions (e.g., TACO Trump), which makes it almost impossible to predict what will happen next.

Trump won’t admit he is responsible for the rise in consumer prices since April 2. But it happened at the same time that he announced his retaliatory tariffs on the rest of the world.

There is pushback from the bond market, which doesn’t like inflation because it reduces the value of bonds. We can see that certain financial markets are already reacting to the inflation uptick with higher interest rates, which is making consumers increasingly unhappy, even with the second -0.25 percent rate cut in October.

This translates into higher mortgage rates as well, which won’t make the housing industry happy either. So, who will lobby against more easy money to prevent another Great Recession, which happened the last time Republicans pushed through such an easy money agenda by blatantly ignoring financial regulations?

Though no one was punished for it, and American taxpayers paid for the bailout of our financial system. Will that happen again, now that Republicans are once again in charge?

Consumers don’t like higher prices, period, and there is another election in 2026. They might even remember the eight million job losses that followed what was the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

The Truth About High Tariffs

 Popular Economics Weekly

“High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. Then the worst happens: markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs.” President Reagan

Reagan Library

Was President Reagan predicting what would happen in Trump’s second term as president?

President Trump didn’t like Ontario Prime Minister Dog Ford’s posting of a 1987 radio address by President Reagan criticizing high tariffs that went viral because it was describing what was happening with Trump’s illegal, retaliatory tariffs that are destroying the American economy and chasing our allies into deals with China.

It was obvious President Trump didn’t want his public to know that starting a tariff war with all 180 countries in the world would trigger “fierce trade wars” and sow economic chaos.

Add the job losses for “millions of people” his massive downsizing of the federal workforce that provides the benefits that protect all Americans, while attacking our institutions of higher learning that prepare us for the future, we can see where this can lead.

His actions are already contributing to a skilled worker shortage and the shrinkage of huge segments of the U.S. working age population with his attacks on immigrants that make up 40 percent of our agricultural workers and a large part of our service industry workers.

Is the chaos he is causing designed to destroy the U.S. economy as we know it, “markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down,” so that all or most power will be concentrated in the hands of the oligarchs and close allies that support him?

It happened in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Its collapse caused Russian oligarchs and Putin to snap up whole industries for pennies on the dollar, thus concentrating their wealth where Putin could control it.

Why can’t it happen here? Trump adores Putin as his model, but he would need a cowed tribe of supporters similar to Russia’s serb population, the serfs of old, liberated little more than 100 years ago, to sustain his power. Right now, it’s Trump’s White Christian Nationalists (like Putin’s Russian Orthodox supporters), but they are a small minority.

President Trump will only succeed in his scheme if he can convince enough Americans that his tariffs against the rest of the world (and higher inflation) are good for US because it would bring back better-paying industrial jobs to his base in the Midwest that had suffered from the globalization of manufacturing.

But that’s not what President Reagan said. He would also have to convince enough Americans that destroying large segments of the U.S. economy—in public health, environmental protection, social services—is worth the cost of higher tariffs, rather than live as his red state supporters have suffered under Republican rule; many with no minimum wage, minimal or no health care, no environmental protection from increasingly frequent natural disasters, and above all, a distrust in science that would provide them a better future.

We should ask ourselves, why would President Trump enact his agenda outside of most customs and laws, demolish the East Wing of the White House to build a 90,000 square foot ballroom without approved plans or permits?

Trump can only be stopped from his attempt to set up an American version of Putin’s Oligarchy, if enough Americans will believe in President Reagan’s predictions.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Housing Market Is Recovering

 The Mortgage Corner

WASHINGTON (October 23, 2025) – Existing-home sales increased by 1.5% month-over-month in September, according to the National Association of REALTORS® Existing-Home Sales Report. The Report provides the real estate ecosystem, including agents and homebuyers and sellers, with data on the level of home sales, price, and inventory.

FREDexistinghomes

It’s about time. We are seeing a housing revival with existing home sales on a 7-month high for the first time since the 2008-09 Great Recession (wide gray band in FRED graph), as reported by the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

The housing market has been stuck in part because the Fed held off cutting interest rates until its September FOMC. The cut was just -0.25%, and two more rate cuts are expected this year.

That may start a more sustained housing recovery, as fixed mortgage rates are also beginning to decline despite rising inflation since April and Trump’s retaliatory tariffs. (Bond holders don’t like inflation because it reduces the value of bonds.)

"As anticipated, falling mortgage rates are lifting home sales," said NAR Chief Economist Dr. Lawrence Yun. "Improving housing affordability is also contributing to the increase in sales."

Affordability has improved because "Inventory is matching a five-year high, though it remains below pre-COVID levels," Yun added. "Many homeowners are financially comfortable, resulting in very few distressed properties and forced sales. Home prices continue to rise in most parts of the country, further contributing to overall household wealth."

The 30-year conforming fixed mortgage rate for best credit holders has dipped below 6% to about 5.875% for 0 pts. in closing costs, or 5.50% for a 1 pt. origination fee. The 15-year fixed rate is now 5.25% for 0 pts., and 4.875%, 1 pt. at this writing.

This year’s housing revival first showed up in a boost in new-home sales, according to the National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB). Sales of newly built single-family homes jumped 20.5% earlier in August, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 800,000 from an upwardly revised reading in July, according to newly released data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Much of the new-home sales boost was due to a construction surge to as much as 1.9 million annual units after the COVID-19 pandemic, seasonally adjusted. That and record low interest rates during the pandemic caused bloated inventories that builders are attempting to reduce. So they are offering interest rate buydowns to reduce mortgage rates. It cuts into builders’ profits but adds little to the sales price.

Housing construction has declined since then, decreasing 8.5% in August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.31 million units and construction will probably remain lower until more buyers come into the housing market as mortgage rates decline further.

What about mortgage rates? That hasn’t stopped homebuyers before. The 30-year conforming fixed rate hovered between 7.5% to 5.0% from the beginning of the housing bubble in 2000 to 2010 when homebuyers went wild with subprime loans, until the Great Recession.

The moral of this tale is that homebuyers and lenders have always found a way to finance a purchase with an almost infinite variety of mortgage choices. But the U.S. population is beginning to shrink because of the immigration restrictions. Builders and governments must find more creative solutions to affordable housing to bring more young adults into the housing market.

Challenging affordability conditions have always created headwinds for the housing sector, but that never stopped those that wanted to own a residence during the era of double-digit interest rates in the 1980s and 90s.

The average 30-year conforming fixed rate mortgage didn’t drop below 10% until the 1990s and 7.5% until 2001.

I foresee lenders finding creative ways to finance more homebuyers in the coming years as well.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

When Will It End?

 Popular Economics Weekly

The government shutdown is a good time to look at how Donald Trump’s economy is doing in his second term, if we want any peace and prosperity at all once the real costs of the tariff war and his tax cuts become obvious.

“With yet another round of tariffs taking effect this week — this time on cabinets and other furniture, timber and lumber — the White House insists that its policies are about “fairness” and “reciprocity.” The evidence now tells a different story of higher prices for Americans, lower margins for U.S. firms, collapsing exports in flagship industries, investment paralysis and mounting risks of an economic slowdown.” Veronique de Rugy LATimes

Part of the problem is that Trump has always needed a lot of help to survive his storied temper tantrums, multiple business failures and bankruptcies. He learned how to play a successful businessman that he was not in “The Apprentice” TV show that he touted in his early book, Trump: How to Get Rich.

Huffington Post

“With his luxury buildings, award-winning golf courses, high-stakes casinos, and glamorous beauty pageants, Donald J. Trump is one of a kind in American business. Every day, he lives the American dream. Now he shows you how it’s done, in this rollicking, inspirational, and illuminating behind-the-scenes story of invaluable lessons and rich rewards,” said Amazon’s “How To Get Rich” book blurb.

His “American Dream” was never meant for the many, just the few. Many Americans are not living the dream that Trump promised because raising the tariffs to Great Depression levels in the name of “fairness and reciprocity” is raising the prices for all Americans, and slowing economic growth.

The LATimes reported a recent KPMG survey finds that “60% of businesses reported decreased overseas sales” in the first six months of Trump’s tariffs. KPMG finds that nearly half of American companies have already raised prices because of tariffs; two-thirds have passed at least part of those costs on to shoppers; and nearly 40% have paused hiring, with a third cutting jobs.

CEOs overwhelmingly expect tariffs to weigh on business for years. Goldman Sachs estimates U.S. consumers are now footing 55% of the total tariff bill, while foreign exporters bear only a sliver of the costs.

“So much for draining the swamp. All of this explains the wild uncertainty business leaders have experienced in recent months. Retailers are now bracing for 100% tariffs on Chinese goods scheduled for Nov. 1, right before the holiday rush. Some firms have scurried to ship early, but even a few days’ delay at sea could blow up their margins. With deadlines set, delayed and often re-announced with each news conference, companies can’t plan or invest,” said de Rugy.

The NYTimes cites a Moody’s Analytics report that the top 10 percent of U.S. households now account for nearly half of all domestic spending. And the Federal Reserve just reported that consumers’ revolving credit shrank (-5.5%) for the first time since 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Republicans and Donald Trump have put on quite a show to convince Americans that they are better off by cutting government jobs and benefits in the name of a better use their benefits.

But it’s turning out “How To Get Rich” is a scheme to benefit the very few whose taxes have been reduced. The shutdown will end when enough Americans realize it is being paid for with higher inflation and taxes (tariffs) for the many.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Whose Inflation Is It?

Financial FAQs

“Still, despite multiple offsetting drivers, the tariff shock is further dimming already lackluster growth prospects. We expect a slowdown in the second half of this year, with only a partial recovery in 2026, and, compared to last October’s projections, inflation is expected to be persistently higher. Even in the United States, growth is weaker and inflation higher than we projected last year—hallmarks of a negative supply shock.” IMF Global Economic Outlook 2025

FREDcpi

No one wants to admit who is responsible for the sharp rise in consumer prices since April 2. Democrats and the Biden administration had worked to bring the Consumer Price Index (CPI) portrayed in the above graph down to 2.3% from its high of 9% that occurred in 2023 from the COVID-19 pandemic.

But it began to rise again in this April at the same time that Trump announced retaliatory tariffs on the rest of the world. Republicans say the inflation was caused by Biden’s massive government spending programs that sped up the COVID-19 pandemic recovery.

Most economists maintain that the inflation spike was caused in large part because of the supply shortages during the pandemic. President Trump’s tariff war on imports from the rest of the world that he announced on April 2 exacerbated the product shortages as exporters scrambled to find cheaper supply routes to avoid the higher tariffs.

Add to this the looming worker shortage from tighter immigration policies that are shrinking the foreign-born labor supply—another negative supply shock on top of that from tariffs—that is beginning to affect labor productivity.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its latest Global Economic Outlook report says both the tariffs and a looming worker shortage are “hallmarks of a negative supply shock” that will eventually slow down world economic growth.

China is now restricting the export of rare earth minerals, for which Trump has threatened to add an additional 100 percent tariff on China’s exports to US. And the government shutdown will only make things worse in closing down the statistical departments that tell us where we are and might be in six months.

“Overall, despite a steady first half, the outlook remains fragile, and risks remain tilted to the downside,” reports the IMF. “The main risk is that tariffs may increase further from renewed and unresolved trade tensions, which, coupled with supply chain disruptions, could lower global output by 0.3 percent next year. Apart from this, four simmering downside risks are especially worrying.”

What are they? U.S. financial markets are overinvested in AI with little to show for it, while AI is already causing white-collar layoffs, exacerbating the job losses incurred by the ICE roundup of undocumented immigrants.

And we have a record $39 trillion federal debt weighing on the credit markets that is competing with the private capital needed for new plants and equipment investment.

The Trump administration is vainly attempting to equate the record tariff rates, now at Great Depression levels, let us not forget, with some promised domestic industrial revival.

And Trump wants an easy money Federal Reserve to help grease its wheels. How do you think interest rates and inflation will respond to easier credit? The same way inflation and interest rates responded to Joe Biden’s New, New Deal?

We can’t borrow our way out of this debt mess with tax cuts for the wealthiest.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

 

A Different Federal Reserve

Financial FAQs

“Warsh would chart a new course that de-emphasizes the inflationary impact of factors such as supply chains and tariffs in favor of a views of inflation driven by government spending and the money supply.” Barron’s

Graph: Last Tech Age

The Federal Reserve is about to go through a regime change. Though President Trump initially appointed current Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, he hasn’t been happy with Powell’s leadership in his second presidential term because he wants easier credit conditions.

The Fed Governors had been resisting Trump’s pressure to lower interest rates until their rate cut in September, fearing the inflationary effects of Trump’s ongoing tariff wars, which have been boosting inflation.

So what does President Trump want to do? Move the goalposts, so that higher inflation is no longer the danger that the current Fed Board of Governors believe in maintaining their 2% inflation target. This is despite Trump’s promise to bring down inflation on “Day One”.

And Kevin Warsh, a bright young conservative economist who was just interviewed in Barron’s might be the next Fed President to do just that, along with other recently-appointed Fed Governors that are more Trump-friendly.

Do what? The fact that he is the husband of an Estee Lauder heiress worth $billions should tell us all we need to know. He, or someone as conservative, is being groomed as the new Fed Chair to protect great wealth.

A summary of Warsh interview in Barron’s above quote tells us how. He is following the Republican line that most inflation comes from government overspending, for which government must print money. The cure is to cut the size of government in every way rather than raise taxes to pay for it.

So they would blame President Biden and Chairman Powell for the skyrocketing inflation that happened when the Fed printed $2.9 trillion in less than three months, bought roughly $543 billion worth of debt in a week, and reduced interest rates to nearly zero, according to Powell’s Britannica bio.

It caused the Fed’s extensive intervention in the U.S. economy after the COVID-19 crisis of 2020 because consumer inflation then skyrocketed to a high of 9% so that the Fed began to raise short term rates to bring down inflation.

Republicans then made it a cause celebre even though it’s now obvious Trump never intended to bring down inflation on “Day One” or any other day.

In fact, most of the government largesse (with Republicans’ bipartisan support) was meant to be spent on the pandemic recovery and modernization of the American economy, which would take at least a decade. And it would largely pay for itself over the longer term with higher economic growth.

The result was that the American economy recovered from the pandemic faster than the rest of the world and resulted in several quarters of +3% GDP growth.

But now Trump has raised tariffs back to 1934 levels that prevailed during the Great Depression without congressional approval, per Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, which is raising the cost of everything for ordinary Americans.

And it was a major cause of the Great Depression because it restricted the flow of goods and services from other countries that were badly needed to recover from the Great Depression, just as the COVID-19 pandemic shut down the whole world’s economy and resulted in a brief recession.

So we know what a new Federal Reserve regime will look like with Kevin Warsh, or another such conservative at its helm. Less interference in private sector business, which means combatting inflation isn’t its only priority (therefore allowing higher inflation). And a smaller government paid for with lower taxes and fewer regulations, which means slashing federal government jobs as DOGE is still doing and cutting more public services that benefit all Americans.

It is following a frighteningly similar trajectory to the economy of the 1930s, the last time tariffs were this high, that led to the Great Depression. The question will be how long Americans will tolerate the corruption and favor-seeking that goes with protecting the wealthy, before looking for another Roosevelt and a New Deal.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Are We in a Recession?

Financial FAQs

“The preliminary estimate of the Current Employment Statistics (CES) national benchmark revision to total nonfarm employment for March 2025 is -911,000 (-0.6 percent), the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. BLS.gov

FREDunemployment

There was a lot of consternation when the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the economy created half as many new jobs from early 2024 to early 2025 in its national benchmark reassessment of the job market— amounting to about 71,000 new jobs a month instead of the previously reported 147,000, said MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash.

Did it mean the BLS doesn’t know what it is doing, and Trump was right to fire the BLS head because he didn’t like the numbers? No, but it does show the job slowdown began last fall during the Biden administration, not in January.

Why? Because the Federal Reserve had been holding their Fed Funds rate at 5.33% for too long, for more than one year until September 2024, before dropping it suddenly -0.5% to 4.83%, then two more times in November and December to 4.33%, where it’s been ever since.

The PCE inflation rate had fallen to 2 percent, so it looked like inflation had been conquered, and it was hurting consumer spending. Did the Fed see the possibility of a recession?

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER that calls recessions) put up the above FRED unemployment rate graph on its website as a simplified picture of what has happened to the unemployment rate during past recessions since 1980 (gray bars are recessions).

Past economic downturns seem to have begun when the unemployment rate rose to 5% and was as high as 10% during the 1981 and 2008 recessions and took months, even years in some cases, to end. The Great Recession of 2008-09 lasted more than 1.5 years, which made it the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression with the loss of nearly 8.9 million jobs, per the BLS.

COVID-19 was the exception to other recessions because the unemployment rate was already 3.5% when it hit and quickly returned to 3.5% when the pandemic ended, indicating the US economy was still fully employed and COVID-19 caused a temporary slowdown in growth. Since then, the unemployment rate has risen steadily to 4.3% in August.

This doesn’t really answer the recession question, since the NBER also looks at other economic numbers, such as real GDP (inflation adjusted), real personal income minus government transfers, real consumer spending, and industrial production, which are still growing, but for how much longer?

This is while the tariffs are in fact causing higher inflation. The BLS reported its Consumer Price Index is up to 2.9% annually from 2.3% in April before the tariffs kicked in, a sure sign that the tariffs have raised overall prices.

“The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.4 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis in August, after rising 0.2 percent in July, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.9 percent before seasonal adjustment.” BLS.gov

The financial markets rallied on the latest inflation news, apparently believing the Fed will finally begin to cut interest rates in September—for the first time since last December.

Lower interest rates are badly needed to counter the high tariff rates that are slowing economic growth, if SCOTUS allows them in Trump’s appeal. They are causing the loss of $trillions to the US auto makers. GM reports it will have lost $1trillion in profits this year if the tariffs remain.

But what if SCOTUS disallows them? The NYtimes cites Alex Durante, a senior economist at the Tax Foundation. “You would be doing a tax cut. You would be undoing a tax increase and you would provide relief to lots of businesses and consumers.”

Wouldn’t that be a better outcome? It would lower import costs and should mean lower prices overall.

We know that upcoming rate cuts by the Federal Reserve are now guaranteed even with the latest inflation reports because of the weak job numbers. This will surely spark higher near-term consumer spending and capital expenditures due to the reduction in borrowing costs, but for how long if the tariffs are allowed, as I said?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

U.S. Already in Recession?

 Financial FAQs

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the US ticked down by 0.1% in May 2025 to 99.0 (2016=100), after declining by 1.4% in April (revised downward from –1.0% originally reported). The LEI has fallen by 2.7% in the six-month period ending May 2025, a much faster rate of decline than the 1.4% contraction over the previous six months.

ConferenceBoard

Are we already in a recession? The Fed doesn’t think so, but the Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators conjectures we will be in a recession soon, if not already. The LEI is a tricky read because it looks at indicators spanning longer periods, hence its name.

The Conference Board’s index of Leading Economic Indicators is now signaling that a recession might have begun in May 2025, though Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the Fed Governors don’t think so. Powell said after last Wednesday’s FOMC meeting that interest rates will stay on hold for now.

“The economy is in solid shape, so the labor market is not crying out for a rate cut,” said Powell. (Therefore, the Fed has time to “learn” more about the economy.)

However, Justyna Zabinska-La Monica, Senior Manager, Business Cycle Indicators, at The Conference Board, said “With the substantial negatively revised drop in April and the further downtick in May, the six-month growth rate of the Index has become more negative, triggering the recession signal,”

The Conference Board creates several surveys, including the Consumer Confidence Index, so it puts the most weight on consumer expectations for business conditions, which has been dropping sharply in its surveys.

And the ISM’s New Order Index as well as private housing building permits have continued to decline as well, thanks to the Fed’s intransigence on reducing interest rates further.

So the LEI is hedging its bets just as the Fed is doing by taking a longer wait and see. “The Conference Board does not anticipate recession, but we do expect a significant slowdown in economic growth in 2025 compared to 2024, with real GDP growing at 1.6% this year and persistent tariff effects potentially leading to further deceleration in 2026.”

Federal Reserve President Chris Waller, one of the Fed Governors, is a dissenter: “I don’t think [the inflation impact of Trump’s tariffs] is going to be that big,” Waller said in an interview on CNBC. “I think we have room to bring [rates] down in July (the next FOMC meeting)”

Almost everyone in congress and President Trump also want lower rates because the new fiscal budget’s annual interest expense could be close to $1 trillion annually on approximately $38 trillion in debt.

This is unsustainable, so everyone is waiting to see if the Republican congress succeeds in driving the U.S. economy over the cliff with their new fiscal budget. Then what good will any amount of import taxes (tariffs) do to fill the debt void?

It’s becoming evident that Republicans will do anything to get their tax cuts, and Democrats don’t seem to be shouting loud enough to win at least two Republican House members to their side that don’t want to bankrupt the U. S. economy.

That’s all they require to block the looming budget disaster. This is while it looks like Trump’s tariffs will ultimately equal those in 1930. And we know the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariffs that raised prices on imports was one of the reasons for the Great Depression.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

What's Next?

 Financial FAQs

“The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the second quarter of 2025 is 1.1 percent on May 1, down from 2.4 percent on April 30.”

AtFedGDPNow

What’s next for economic growth? Predictions for Q2 are all over the map since the first quarter GDP went negative with -0.3% GDP growth because businesses boosted their imports ahead of future price hikes caused by the tariffs, and imports are subtracted from exports in the Gross Domestic Product calculation.

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow Q2 growth estimate of +1.1 percent gives us an idea of what’s to come. It has already fallen sharply from +2.4 percent because of the negative Q1 surprise, as well as the drop in consumer spending (PCE) and real private fixed investment (e.g., factories), all signs of further slowing.

I see stagflation on the economic horizon, rather than an actual recession since wherever the import taxes being negotiated end up to be, it will raise prices. And the service sector of our economy is still expanding, that includes the leisure, healthcare and transportation sectors.

The Institute for Supply Management said that its service-sector PMI rose to 51.6% in April from 50.8% in the prior month in the largest sector of our economy. The measure of new orders rose to 52.3% in April from 50.4 in the prior month. And the measure of prices paid for services for inputs jumped to 65.1 from 60.9 in the prior month, which is the inflation component of stagflation.

However, Q2 growth is uncertain because no one knows what the tariffs will be (i.e., import taxes). If Q2 GDP should also contract it could indicate we are in a recession, since two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth have been one tell of a recession.

Torsten Slok, Apollo Global’s chief economist interviewed on CNBC’s Squawk Box predicts if the high tariffs that were. put in place earlier this month remain in effect, odds of a two-quarter contraction in economic output stand at 90 percent, with gross domestic product dropping by 4 percentage points.

But Trump knows this so he will probably bring the tariffs down to the 10 percent minimum already being levied on all 180 countries in the world (that include penguin only islands).

Trump has probably calculated this will ultimately bring in enough tax revenues to enable the tax cuts he wants enacted for his Oligarchs. The rest of Americans will suffer, however, as the budget negotiations will demand spending cuts to everything else except the military and immigration services

So we shouldn’t ignore a recession possibility, since China is the elephant in the room, and could derail everything, since it accounts for most of the holiday season imports, for starters. And any manufacturing renaissance will be years in the offing.

Declining Gross Domestic Product growth isn’t the only measure of recession. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the official caller of recessions, adds several other indicators, such as when nonfarm payrolls, personal incomes, and industrial production have peaked in a business cycle.

The NBER, a board of top economists, makes the recession call by looking at peaks and troughs of business activity. The last recession was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown and came after the longest post WWII expansion in history, said the NBER.

“The committee has determined that a peak in monthly economic activity occurred in the U.S. economy in February 2020. The peak marks the end of the expansion that began in June 2009 and the beginning of a recession. The expansion lasted 128 months, the longest in the history of U.S. business cycles dating back to 1854.”

And small businesses, who thought Trump would bring some relief from regulations as well as lower prices, do not like what they are seeing, I said last week. The National Federation of Independent Business on Tuesday said its Small Business Optimism Index dropped 3.3 points in March to 97.4, falling just below its 51-year average of 98.

Marketplace, a public radio show, said the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the Trump administration this week saying that tariffs pose “significant risks to U.S. employment” and may soon do “irreparable harm” to many small businesses. 

The Chamber, which represents businesses of all sizes, is asking the administration to lift tariffs on any goods that “cannot be made in the U.S.,” establish a tariff exclusion process and automatically exempt small business importers from tariffs.

The problem is that President Trump believes he can use tariffs to wall us off from our allies and trading partners. But wanna be autocrats, such as Trump, are terrible at running economies. The best examples are Turkey’s President Erdogan or Putin, whose economies still suffer from double-digit inflation.

They make decisions for the wrong reasons, because they don’t have to please everyone, just their Oligarchs. But an era of stagflation as happened in the 1970s could cause as much suffering, so stay tuned. Whether recession or prolonged stagflation, it won’t be pretty.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Do Job Cuts = Recession?

 Popular Economics Weekly

“I don’t see any kind of well-thought-out, comprehensive strategy coming out of the White House,” said Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist at the Economic Outlook Group, a nonpartisan forecasting firm.

What is the White House strategy? Is it based on the campaign promises to bring down inflation on “Day 1”, eliminate waste and fraud, and cut regulations that impede new investments, such as in AI?

The White House to date is attempting to explain why it hasn’t developed a strategy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opined that,

“The market and the economy have just become hooked, and we’ve become addicted to this government spending, and there’s going to be a detox period. There’s going to be a detox,” Bessent, a former hedge-fund manager, said during a CNBC interview.

This description of a “detox” period is alarming, because the term has nothing to do with an economic plan, or anything else, but in fact means the Trump administration is hinting that a recession may be required to wean US off what they deem as too many government services that benefit ordinary Americans rather than the Oligarchs that have jumped onto the Trump/Musk bandwagon.

The wet dream of Republicans and conservatives has historically been to downsize government to little more than military defense. That’s why Trump has targeted USAID and the Department of Education, as well as cuts to social security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former (Republican) director of the Congressional Budget Office, said it was a fine sentiment for a Treasury secretary to want to reduce government spending but noted that there was no GOP plan in sight to accomplish this goal in any sustainable way, according to MarketWatch.

FREDfederalspending%GDP

Part of the problem in downsizing government is that it’s extremely difficult to bring federal government spending below 20 percent of Gross Domestic Product as portrayed in the above FRED historical graph dating from 2010. Spending surged above that level only twice to aid recoveries from the Great Recession and COVID pandemic.

Part of that surge was the Biden administration’s new, New Deal legislation that has already brought 700,000 manufacturing jobs home in the CHIPS, Infrastructure and Inflation Reduction Acts.

These were public/private investments that resulted in the US having the fastest economic recovery from COVID-19 in the developed world.

Trumps says he also wants to bring manufacturing jobs home with the trade tariffs. But his single-minded emphasis on tariffs against friend or foe without negotiating up front will increase inflation, largely because it will be reciprocated, launching a trade war.

And rather than eliminating waste and fraud, the DOGE firings are downsizing or eliminating departments and agencies that make it work—such as the FAA, Energy Department, VA and even social security—which will do exactly the opposite—make us less safe.

“It all seems to be very capricious,” continued Baumohl, “and I think this has been of great concern, not just to U.S. and foreign investors, but certainly to consumers, and we’ve seen that in the abrupt decline in confidence, which is now showing up in in their spending patterns. Once consumers start to cut back, there is nothing that the government can do to make sure that the economy keeps out of recession, because we’re talking about 70% of all economic activity.”

Will such a strategy, or lack of it, work? American consumers are already starting to give the final word. The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey showed consumers becoming even more pessimistic about their future.

“Consumer sentiment slid another 11% this month, with declines seen consistently across all groups by age, education, income, wealth, political affiliations, and geographic regions. Sentiment has now fallen for three consecutive months and is currently down 22% from December 2024.” said Survey Director Joanne Hsu.

It looks like the Trump/Musk administration doesn’t want Americans to know what they are really up to, and it is leading to the wholesale destruction of the U.S. economy.

It will take more than picketing Tesla factories and dealerships for Americans to prevent what is sure to become a recession from happening.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen