Where's the Inflation?

Financial FAQs

“Economic activity is expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty that owes, in part, to the conflict in the Middle East…Inflation remains elevated relative to the Committee's 2 percent goal, in part reflecting supply shocks that have driven price increases in certain sectors, including energy.” FOMC

MarketWatch

New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh wouldn’t say when the Fed would join the chorus calling for a rate hike at his June press conference. He was waiting to hear from task forces studying problem! When have we heard this before?

The U.S. and Iran keep bombing each other, and Iran has just said they are in no hurry to negotiate another ceasefire, while Trump just found another way to keep tariffs high.

And the bond market and inflation indicators are showing higher inflation ahead. Is there any doubt that the Fed’s Fed Funds rate is going higher, as well, with the Fed’s FOMC statement mentioning “elevated uncertainty” re the Middle East conflict?

The financial markets didn’t like the Fed’s inaction, which is why the market indexes plunged after the FOMC statement—the DOW ended the day down by -1150 pts.

Yet economic disaster is staring Americans in the face, if Trump keeps raising tariffs and can’t stop his Gulf war. It cuts into consumer spending, raising the cost of everything when debt at all levels—national, corporate, and consumers are already at record levels.

Raising the Fed’s interest rate will slow rising inflation by slowing economic growth. The Fed FOMC conclusion that economic activity is “expanding at a solid case” was because of over investment in the AI build out of data centers, almost all of it borrowed money. And many of the AI investors are borrowing from and investing in each other, like Japan’s keiretsu system of interlocking ownerships that impeded them from writing off bad debts when their decades long economic stagnation occurred.

One ‘tell’ of the possibility of a US. recession is that huge new orders for computers and related products jumped 3.1% in June, the government said Monday in its monthly report on durable goods.

The last time there was such a surge in goods investment was during the dot-com era, according to MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash. “Over the past year, orders for the AI-related hardware have surged 17%, a level last sustained during the dot-com era more than a quarter of a century ago,” he said.

But the dot-com investments didn’t begin to show enough profit for decades to pay for the investments, hence the 2000 dot-com recession that Alan Greenspan and Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller predicted with their warning that irrational exuberance was blinding investors from reality.

Yet the Fed must act to raise rates sooner or later, since higher inflation is already embedded in consumer surveys, according to the University of Michigan’s sentiment survey:

“Year-ahead inflation expectations ticked down from 4.6% in June to a still-elevated 4.2% this month. The current reading substantially exceeds the 3.4% seen in February before the Iran conflict began, (my bold) along with all 2024 readings. Long-run inflation expectations held steady from last month at 3.3%, remaining a bit higher than the 2.8% to 3.2% range seen in 2024.”

The advance second quarter GDP growth estimate was just 1.5 percent, another casualty of the tariffs and Mideast wars despite the AI investment surge. It’s no wonder the Fed’s Governors are avoiding the obvious; when to begin to restrict credit before inflation becomes entrenched longer term, as it did in the 1970s.

What were the conditions then? Energy supplies were restricted, inflation soared, and economic growth stagnated. Hence the decade of stagflation. Is this a repeat?

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

 

“The economy hasn’t lost its mojo.” MarketWatch

 Financial FAQs

“Advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for June 2026, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $768.6 billion, up 0.2 percent (±0.4 percent)* from the previous month, and up 6.7 percent (±0.5 percent) from June 2025.” Census.gov

FREDretailsales

Headlines, such as that consumers “haven’t lost their mojo” have popped up when retail sales rose 0.2 percent in June. It’s a sign of consumers are willing to ‘shop until they drop’, which may keep the U.S. economy growing for some time.

It also means that same level of irrational exuberance of the 1990s is back once again, with the major market indexes at record levels, and consumers seemingly oblivious to the conditions that prevailed during the late 1990s.

 Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller first presented the term irrational exuberance to Alan Greenspan’s Federal Reserve Governors in 1996 to evidence how overvalued stock market levels had become at the time. But it wasn’t until 2000 that the dot-com asset bubble burst that many market commentators and some economists are comparing to the current record market rally.

The MarketWatch headline portrays most of the media’s reaction to the latest Advance Retail and Food sales report by the U.S. Census Bureau. The slightly hysterical headline is really a sign of relief because of the slight drop in monthly gas prices that prevailed during the 60-day cease fire agreement.

But the cease fire has ended. And it reveals how badly the Trump tariffs and Iran war have hurt consumer spending, still the backbone of U.S. economic growth. We have been a consumer-driven economy since the 1950s and end of World War II.

And since retail sales are not inflation adjusted, when adjusted for inflation, gas and food in particular have become less affordable. Retail inflation is still above 3 percent. Retail sales have fluctuated wildly, as per the above graph, rising 6.7 percent in 12 months because consumer bought more in earlier months to get ahead of the rising inflation—i.e., before the Iran War began to jack up everyday prices.

Though sales at car dealers and online merchants both jumped about 2 percent in June, sales fell at grocery, clothing and healthcare stores, says MarketWatch.

So, consumers are still shopping because they must, putting them further in debt. The Consumer Price Index for basic necessities like gas and food is still above 3 percent, as I said, and the wholesale (PPI) price index for raw materials that go into retail goods is 5.5 percent annually, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. It’s still the largest rise in more than three years.

We don’t have to look at just the dot-com bubble to compare, either. I see an unsettling resemblance to the ‘roaring twenties’ of an earlier era from the recovery of another pandemic, the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1919 to 1920 that killed what would be millions of Americans if at our current population level.

It was a long recovery—until 1929 and the Black Friday stock market crash that led to the Great Depression, caused in part by another era of high tariffs that led to product shortages.

How long may this era of irrational exuberance last that has driven the financial markets to record levels with so much wealth pouring into a new space age that will take us years to return to the moon, much less turn a profit?

We are at another turning point in what currently looks like an A.I. revolution, much like the Internet’s introduction that took decades to adopt, and recovered from a Great Recession, let’s not forget.

So the best way to survive another bout of irrational exuberance is to be patient, in my opinion, rather than listen to the crowd that promises the next big thing.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Slower Economic Growth Ahead?

Popular Economics Weekly

Second-Quarter GDP Growth Estimate Increased
“On July 7, the GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth in the second quarter of 2026 is 1.4 percent, up from 1.2 percent on July 1.”

AtlantaFed

What is happening to U.S. economic growth in 2026? The Atlanta Federal Reserve is one of the few organizations brave enough to attempt to predict future growth in constantly updated forecasts. And the news is not good for most Americans.

The culprit for the volatility in GDP second quarter economic growth predictions by the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate that had dipped as low as 1.2 percent and is still a mere 1.4 percent (in the above GDP graph), is the large increase in our trade deficit.

And this was the gap that President Trump wanted to shrink with his new tariffs. It has worsened largely because Trump and his advisors don’t know what they are doing; i.e., haven’t taken the time to make the tariffs legal by negotiating with trade partners after doing the required research and then getting congressional approvals, rather than via his illegal executive orders.

The GDPNow model was predicting 3-4 percent Q2 GDP growth until last June as per the graph. But the trade gap has suddenly jumped 42.2% to $77.6 billion, the highest level since March 2025, said the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau.

The most hurt is being done to American workers, since the enlarged trade deficit mirrors the production that had shifted overseas. So many of the components that go into the surging AI build-out are now being imported--especially computers and computer chips—which means an increasing share of the buildout is benefiting foreign workers.

This is a main reason for the alarming drop in June job numbers to a mere 57,000 workers, most of them in healthcare. Some 755,000 workers dropped out of the labor force in June because “jobs are hard to get,” said the Conference Board’s latest consumer Confidence Survey.

What's more, job gains in May and April were revised down to a combined 277,000 from a previous 351,000 - 74,000 fewer than previously reported.

Trump’s Iran War disaster is another reason for the hiring slowdown because higher energy prices from the Middle East is elevating inflation. Wall Street is hoping the A.I. revolution will boost labor productivity to such an extent that it will tame inflation, but without creating many new jobs.

The trade gap jumped 42.2% to $77.6 billion, the highest level since March 2025.

The major culprit; capital goods imports soared $1.1 billion to a record high $128.0 billion that subtract from GDP growth, which calculates just what is produced domestically.

We could be producing more of those imports domestically. But that hasn’t happened so exports dropped 3.2% to $317.7 billion in the latest report.

The shrinking labor force will also shrink GDP growth since fewer workers plus higher inflation means less will be produced domestically because of the higher costs, unless A.I. delivers on its promises of higher productivity. And that will take years, experts have been saying.

All this means fewer Americans will benefit for some time. The International Monetary fund predicts prices won’t come back down until the end of 2027, and only if the Iran war ends.

The official scorecard of the U.S. economy was updated to show the economy grew at a 2.1% annual pace in the first three months of the year, faster than the previously reported 1.6%.

Is that good news? Maybe, but Q1 consumer spending was the weakest in four years.

There will be more robots, Claude, ChatGPT, Open AI, etc., etc. but a shrinking workforce pays less taxes to support public policies, social security, Medicare. And don’t forget the public debt, which is soaring.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Is This Real Growth?

 Financial FAQs

“Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2026 (January, February, and March), according to the second estimate released today by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Real GDP was revised down 0.4 percentage point from the advance estimate, primarily reflecting downward revisions to investment and consumer spending.” BEA.gov

FRED/Q1gdp

Economic growth this year is improving because corporations are making record profits—up 17 percent annually in Q1 2026 from an average 13 percent since the COVID-19 pandemic.

But it looks like much of the growth may be part of the tech bubble—such as massive overinvestments in chips and artificial intelligence (AI)—creating a bubble which by definition and past history will eventually deflate.

Why the sudden jump in corporate profits to 17 percent? It’s mostly from investing in the massive buildout of artificial intelligence centers and the infrastructure. How long can such GDP growth continue, especially if those future investments, such as in AI programs or the chips that power AI, may take years to turn a profit?

Republicans’ Big Beautiful Tax Cut Bill encouraged corporations to invest as much as possible this year because they could write it off in the same year, and those investments are generating serious profits in the buildout of AI data centers, for starters.

But the Biden administration’s $5trillion in investments to modernize the American economy—the CHIPS, Infrastructure, and Inflation Reduction Acts—are also contributing to the surge in growth.

Yet largely because of the Trump Administration’s mismanagement; even attempts to cancel or impede many of the Biden administration programs that would actually improve inflation, healthcare, environmental protection, and bring the manufacture of computer chips home; we are seeing those profits going into irrationally exuberant, overinvestment in future technologies with uncertain futures instead that is pushing major stocks and market indexes to record highs.

The announcements on the possibilities of AI are mind boggling. Zack Kass, Open AI pioneer and author of bestseller, The Next RENAISSANCE: AI and the Expansion of Human Potential, has said:

“If directed wisely, it will secure our needs, accelerate discoveries that serve human flourishing and unlike the products that commoditize our attention today, free us to invest in connections creativity and love.”

It will free whom, and what will they do then? It is causing massive layoffs at the likes of Amazon (30,000 employees to date) who hope that programs like Claude and ChatGPT can do much of the thinking and future planning for these corporations.

Consumers aren’t doing so well that actually make up most of the GDP growth equation. Their so-called Disposable Income (an economic term) declined to “slightly less than -0.1%” in April.

It resulted in a lowering of the personal savings rate to almost 2%, one-half of its more normal 3-4 percent rate in recent years. Consumers are stretched in other words; more than half of their incomes are now spent on the soaring costs of gasoline/energy products, household necessities, and food. This is another reason we may see slowing GDP growth ahead.

There is no question that AI has enormous potential for good, in what British economist JM Keynes made in a famous prediction in 1930, should there not be too many bumps in the promised road to a greater freedom from work:

“Thus for the first time since his creation man will be faced with his real, his permanent problem-how to use his freedom from pressing economic cares, how to occupy the leisure, which science and compound interest will have won for him, to live wisely and agreeably and well.” JM Keynes

But Keynes said this in 1930. How long has it been since then?

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Time To Pay the Piper

 Popular Economics Weekly

 “The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining. [State of the Union Address January 11 1962]” President John F Kennedy

Wikipedia

Two of our largest domestic economies are heeding President Kennedy’s words, “when the sun is shining”; it’s time to begin paying our national debt during this record-breaking stock market run that is currently benefiting the wealthiest Americans.

We are drowning in a federal debt that is endangering our good faith and credit while crowding out domestic spending on the public services that make life more bearable for ordinary Americans. We have a federal debt that is now 120% of the annual output of the U.S. economy (Gross Domestic Product).

New York City’s Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and California Governor Gavin Newsom have announced that it’s possible to balance a budget. Maybe that’s something Republicans should also heed if they want to remain relevant to America’s future by offering more than tax cuts and bloated military budgets.

New York City is the largest U.S. city with an 8.5 million population, and the State of California has the fourth largest economy in the world behind the U.S., China and Japan.

Mayor Mamdani announced the $124.7 billion Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Executive Budget, putting New York City on firm financial footing while protecting the services working people rely on. “Through strong fiscal management, Mayor Mamdani balanced the budget through a combination of aggressive savings, new tax revenue, partnership with Albany and critical new investments.”

California’s 2026-27 budget, as revised by Governor Gavin Newsom on May 14, 2026, “projects no deficit for that year and the next budget year (2027-28), with a structural deficit eliminated through July 2028.”

It’s a sign that Americans in Democratic states at least want to move on from the trickle-down economic policies that Republicans have practiced since 1980, resulting in five recessions including the Great Recession on their watch.

It has perpetrated the greatest income and wealth inequality of all—red states depriving their own citizens of a livable minimum wage and social services that make their lives bearable, with no minimum wage higher than the national minimum wage of $7.25 per hour (portrayed in the Wikipedia map), or state taxes to pay their bills and provide adequate health care.

That’s a reason most Republican-led, so-called red states, have fallen far behind in growth compared to Democrat-led blue states –many with surplus tax revenues that go to many of the red states in the form of benefit payments to balance their budgets.

California, for instance, has the largest tax ‘imbalance’ in the nation. Varying estimates show Californians pay between $83billion and $275billion more to the IRS than the federal government returns to the state in the form of Social Security, healthcare, military contracts, and disaster aid.

Whereas red states like Kentucky require $Billions from the federal coffers to meet their budget needs. For instance, 10 red states have no Medicaid health insurance for their low-income residents.

The results show the glaring damage the minimal, ‘bare bones’ red state budgets wreak on the health and safety of their citizens. Red states exhibit higher premature mortality rates and higher incidences of death from major internal causes, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke. Blue state citizens on average live longer.

NIH research shows a clear partisan health divide in the United States, with "blue" (Democratic-leaning) states consistently outperforming "red" (Republican-leaning) states across major public health metrics, including life expectancy, infant mortality, and preventable chronic illnesses.

The New York City and California examples show that state and federal governments know how to balance a budget that benefits all Americans, not just the wealthiest. The Clinton Administration even created four consecutive years of budget surpluses in the 1990s that paid down the federal debt.

A consensus is building that our national debt must be dealt with. Balancing budgets are the responsible way to deal with it, not the trickle-down economic policies that have created the monstrous debt from the many Republican tax cuts that have deprived red states’ citizens of a decent standard of living.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Biden vs. Trump Presidency

 Popular Economics Weekly

“The Producer Price Index for final demand increased 1.4 percent in April, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Final demand prices advanced 0.7 percent in March and 0.6 percent in February. The April increase is the largest advance since rising 1.7 percent in March 2022.” BLS.gov

FREDppi

Trump’s economy vs. Biden’s? It’s no contest. Trump made his major reelection campaign about attacking Biden’s inflation problem, yet the latest wholesale and retail inflation data show President Biden has easily won the inflation battle, as well as that for job creation and economic growth.

The retail Consumer Price Index is the highest in three years, and the wholesale Producer Price Index pictured above is now the highest in four years on Trump’s watch.

There’s no contest with job creation and economic growth as well. A total 234,000 payrolls jobs were added in December 2024, Biden’s last month in office; more than the 181,000 jobs that were created in all of Trump’s first year.

That’s because of Trump’s mismanagement of the illegal tariff war on the rest of the world, the 43-day government shutdown over Obama insurance subsidies (longest in history) that temporally laid off millions of workers and the immigrant deportations.

The illegal tariffs began the inflation surge we are seeing today in import prices. “The 12-month rise in U.S. import prices was the largest over-the-year advance since the index increased 4.2 percent for the year ended October 2022,” per the BLS.

This will also make it even more difficult to lower interest rates in 2026 for the Federal Reserve under new Republican Chairman Kevin Warsh. In fact, the Fed may have to raise their rates if inflation continues to rise and becomes unmanageable as happened during Biden’s term.

That’s because we are not yet accounting for the damage from the Iran war that is elevating prices for all the petroleum byproducts important for jobs and economic growth that are sure to seep into the inflation numbers.

Even if the Iran war is settled soon, predictions are it may take at least one year for a return to normal traffic in the Gulf and Hurmuz Strait that supplies at least 20 percent of the world’s petroleum.

The damage to jobs and economic growth in Trump’s first year shows the extremes to which Republicans will go to ignore basic economic principles (e.g., tariffs are a tax on consumers and producers) to protect their tax cuts.

Even higher inflation is sure to follow. The energy sector is already being hit with higher gas and diesel prices The AI buildout will increase the demand for electricity as the huge AI energy generation centers kick in from the $billions being invested, while Trump continues to cancel more alternative energy solar and wind projects that provide cheaper electricity.

From the start of the Biden presidency through December 2024, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) recorded an increase of about 16.1 million jobs, the highest total during a presidential term in history, equal to 336,000 per month (my emphasis).

And economic growth averaged more than 3 percent during his four years because of bipartisan plans to modernize the American economy.

What happened on Trump’s watch? Republicans have paid the economic price for refusing to compromise. America’s electorate came to believe that Republicans knew more about economic growth and what it takes to lower everyday prices for Americans.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Is U.S. Growth Slowing?

 Financial FAQs

“Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 1.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2025 (October, November, and December), according to the advance estimate released today by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP increased 4.4 percent.” BEA.gov

 

BEAgdp

The economic chaos that President Trump has sown by using the tariffs as a tool to coerce trading partners is a major cause of the sudden drop in fourth quarter (Q4) GDP growth from Q2 and Q3 growth (see graph).

So it’s great news the Supreme Court ruling that most of President Trump’s tariffs by executive order are illegal. It will create more certainty over the instability that has bedeviled consumers and businesses alike, which encourages future economic growth.

It’s also a huge victory for the rule of law over a president who routinely disobeys the law since only congress has the power to tax.

Businesses had rushed to counter the chaos created by the tariffs by stockpiling imports before Trump announced more tariffs. And import costs are subtracted from export prices to calculate GDP (Because imported goods aren’t produced domestically.), So higher imports, when all else is equal, tends to slow GDP growth, which measures what is produced domestically.

The furlough of hundreds of thousands of workers without pay during the 43-day government shutdown also slowed consumer spending that had already been affected by the tariff uncertainty.

So we are now beginning to see the damage Trump’s imagined cure for our trade deficits has done. He said other countries should have to eat the higher import costs from the tariffs but they passed on most of the higher costs.

Rump’s tariffs didn’t correct the trade imbalance between imports and exports either because importers then found ways to time their purchases between price swings and/or transfer their business to other countries that had lower tariffs.

In fact, the trade deficit—created by the amount imports exceeded exports— barely changed after all Trump’s planned chaos. It was $901 billion in 2025 vs. $903 billion in 2024.

“Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes,” said the Supreme Court opinion, which was supported by a 6-3 majority of the court. Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas dissented.

In other words, President Trump can no longer govern by creating the chaos and uncertainty that has enabled him to accumulate so much power and wealth. So maybe “The times they are a changin?”

And sowing economic chaos by being unpredictable doesn’t work as a negotiating tactic either. Companies usually waited until Trump’s TACO bluster caused him to back down before agreeing to a rate. And SCOTUS ruled he now must do the research required by other laws to justify the tariffs.

Trump’s tariffs did not decrease the flow of imports or boost domestic manufacturing, as intended. Domestic manufacturing lost another 80,000 jobs last year, in large part because of the higher steel and aluminum prices that go into so much manufacturing output.

And the mostly illegal tariffs worsened inflation as well. A New York Fed bank study found U.S. businesses and consumers have paid most of the costs of the price increases on imported goods.

“Over the course of 2025, the average tariff rate on U.S. imports increased from 2.6 to 13 percent. In this blog post, we ask how much of the tariffs were paid by the U.S., using import data through November 2025. We find that nearly 90 percent of the tariffs’ economic burden fell on U.S. firms and consumers” per the NY Federal Reserve.

The harm done by Trump’s tariffs by fiat makes a long list. China had stopped buying agricultural products as in Trump’s first term and higher tariffs have cost Ford and GM $billions in lost profits.

The Supreme Court ruling exposed the harm ignoring laws and our constitution has done to economic growth. Trump’s Republicans are no longer the party that stands for lower taxes, except among their wealthiest supporters. So much for increasing affordability!

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Where Are the Jobs--Part II?

 Financial FAQs

“Job creation took a step back in 2025, with private employers adding 398,000 jobs, down from 771,000 in 2024. While we've seen a continuous and dramatic slowdown in job creation for the past three years, wage growth has remained stable.” ADP

FREDpayrolls

The FRED (St. Louis Federal Reserve) graph tells it all. Job formation has almost disappeared in the Trump economy. It’s not only the shutdowns, which have delayed the official U.S. unemployment report that was due for January, but past months as well, so private payroll data processors like ADP fill in the knowledge gap.

But we know from the latest FRED graph of private payroll hiring that private employers are barely hiring. Just 74,000 jobs were created in November 2025 and 22,000 in January, as reported by ADP.

So the GDP growth spurts last fall 2025 are from the $ trillions being invested in AI energy centers, not in corporations expanding their workforce. Corporations are laying off workers instead.

The best examples are Amazon and now the Washington Post. The NYTimes just reported that the Washington Post told employees on Wednesday that it was beginning a widespread round of layoffs “that are expected to decimate the organization’s sports, local news and international coverage.

“The company is laying off about 30 percent of all its employees, according to two people with knowledge of the decision. That includes people on the business side and more than 300 of the roughly 800 journalists in the newsroom, the people said,” said the NYTimes

CBS News reports that in 2025, companies directly pointed to their use of AI in announcing 55,000 job cuts — more than 12 times the number of layoffs attributed to AI just two years earlier, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas. Of those job losses, 51,000 were in tech, with most of the cuts concentrated in tech-heavy states such as California and Washington.

The main culprit are the tariffs that Trump is using to coerce concessions from foreign governments, but it is doing the most damage to Americans. U.S. vehicle sales plunged in January, for example. Automobile sales increased at an annual rate of 14.9 million in January, down 7% from 16.1 million in the final month of 2025, according to Wards Intelligence and profit losses of $billions have already been reported by GM and Ford due to the higher tariffs on aluminum and steel.

Consumers above all are reacting to the sudden changes in the employment picture. The Conference Board voiced their concerns in the headlineConfidence collapsed to lowest point since 2014, surpassing pandemic depths: “The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index® fell by 9.7 points in January to 84.5 (1985=100), from an upwardly revised 94.2 in December. A 5.1-point upward revision to December’s reading of the Index resulted in a slight increase last month, reversing the initially reported decline. However, January’s preliminary results showed confidence resumed declining after a one-month uptick.

So unemployed workers are now suffering under both the rising inflation from the tariffs and AI replacing many of their jobs.

It’s not a pretty picture, while we are still waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on whether most of Trump’s tariffs are even legal. It much safer to do nothing in such circumstances—consumers to hold on to their savings and employers to replace their workers with more technology.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen