"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Roosevelt

 Popular Economics

FREDpayrolljobs

The job market is shrinking, to no one’s surprise. But July’s catastrophic unemployment report tells us the loss of -23,000 payroll was particularly horrific. Yet +214,000 jobs were created in March, and the economy was perhaps on its way to decent growth this year.

It’s been downhill ever since. More workers are leaving the workforce than are being hired—and 234,000 left the workforce in July—because companies are leery of Trump’s anti-growth policies.

In fact, the sharp drop in payroll hiring began with Trump’s start of the Iran War, as can be seen in the FRED chart. There may have been other factors, such as higher tariffs and threats to invade other countries as well.

But economies don’t like wars begun with no advance notice or preparation, nor does congress, or employers, or most Americans. Tolerating such an ongoing war tells us that many Americans are now living in a country ruled by almost constant fear, under a president who is a convicted felon acting like a mob boss who is ignoring laws and the congress while making decisions through threats and intimidation.

Why did this happen? President Roosevelt faced much larger fears that he addressed in his famous 1933 inauguration speech when 25 percent of Americans were unemployed. And because of such conditions, created the modern social safety net—including social security, union protections, and unemployment insurance—to recover from the Great Depression.

But many of those guarantees have been watered down or eliminated for many Americans since then. We are the only developed country without universal health care, tuition free public college, mandated paid vacations and paid child leave, among other benefits, all major indicators of social well-being.

And Americans suffer from the greatest income inequality in the developed world, engineered by successive conservative governments who have made a concerted effort to roll back President Roosevelt’s New Deal.

They have been so effective, particularly since 1980 and Ronald Reagan’s trickle-down economic policies, that many Americans no longer feel safe, have lost faith in democratic government, and have elected to live in an autocracy—particularly in red states ruled by Republicans—in desperate fear of not only losing their vocations, but their health care and retirement pensions, including social security.

Fear is contagious, but as President Roosevelt knew, was faced down when our government reclaimed its role as a public service that protected all Americans, not just the privileged few.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Where are the Jobs?

 Financial FAQs

“The number of job openings was little changed at 7.4 million in June, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Hires were unchanged at 5.3 million, while total separations changed little at 5.4 million.” BLS

FREDjolts

The job market is shrinking, contributing to the slower economic growth we are seeing this year. For instance, fewer job vacancies are being reported by the Job Openings and Labor Turnover (JOLTS) report, a survey that measures the monthly number of available jobs.

And fewer workers means less will be produced. The JOLTS report also tells us there are more separations–workers leaving the workforce for a variety of reasons than hires.

That’s probably why Q1 2026 GDP growth was just 2.1 percent, and the advance Q2 estimate was 1.5 percent. But there are indications that the AI construction may cause third quarter GDP growth to be higher, as much as 3 per cent with the huge surge in AI spending.

The number of job openings increased in transportation, warehousing, and utilities (+97,000) and in federal government (+39,000). Job openings decreased in wholesale trade (-74,000), nondurable goods manufacturing (-55,000), and mining and logging (-9,000), per the JOLTS report.

The question will be why the reluctance to hire more workers in other sectors? Is it AI? We know that as much as $800 billion is being invested in AI infrastructure and might replace a lot of jobs. So companies may have frozen the number of new hires until they know more about AI’s potential.

What are employers still looking for? The upcoming ‘official’ U.S. unemployment report out in days will also show a shrinking labor force. It’s a huge debate. Firstly, companies have no way yet of measuring what AI may earn on their investments.

“It’s a currency where you have no instinct to know what you are using, and the accounting practices aren’t even there,” said an economist cited by the NYTimes. “The AI stuff is being treated as an investment right now, but it’s a risky investment in case it has no returns.”

It’s not all bad news. The larger, lower paying, service sector economy is still growing. Service companies such as banks, retailers and restaurants expanded last month at an accelerated rate for the sixth month in a row. An index produced by the Institute for Supply Management inched up to 54.1% from 54.0% in the prior month, said MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash.

The manufacturing sector is also growing because of the AI buildout. “In July, U.S. manufacturing activity remained in expansion territory, growing at its fastest rate in more than four years,” reports Susan Spence, MBA, Chair of the Institute for Supply Management^® (ISM^®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee.

But AI is still muddying the job creation picture. It is the sixth year of this expansion, so AI will determine if this is an ongoing boom, or a bust economy. The record DOW and S&P indexes are predicting boom times ahead, but that’s in part because Wall Street and financial markets are counting on the Mideast wars to be settled, Trump to stop levying illegal tariffs, and there are no prolonged energy shortages.

Will that happen? Or do we need a few more election cycles to determine what laws and regulations will govern this emerging economy?

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Why Our Record Inequality?

 Financial FAQs

“Why are we the only developed country without universal health care, tuition free public college, mandated paid vacations and paid child leave, among other benefits, all major indicators of social well-being? We should not need a Michael Moore documentary, such as his latest Where To Invade Next, to tell us what we either no longer provide to our citizens or that cost more?” H Green/Huffington Post

CIA World Factbook

I first wrote a version of this column in 2016, on seeing what I consider to be Michael Moore’s best documentary, Where to Invade Next, a portrait of what other countries have taken from us that we no longer provide for our own citizens, a better standard of living

Nobelist Robert Shiller lamented this fact in a recent New York Times Upshot column. "Economic inequality is already a concern, but it could become a nightmare in the decades ahead, and I fear that we are not well equipped to deal with it."

In fact, the latest CIA World Factbook statistics have told Americans for years that we have a very unequal society; in fact the greatest income inequality in the developed world.

The US is ranked 102nd in the Gini inequality index of 145 countries that the CIA measures for income distribution. Only China of major countries is lower. Even Russia has less income inequality.

And it is this statistic that best highlights the social benefits that all Americans no longer enjoy. For instance, US residents going to public colleges and universities paid no tuition until the 1970s, making a university education prohibitively expensive. 

Another measure that helps to smooth out income inequality is an adequate national minimum wage, which is still $7.25 per hour in many states that did not enact a higher minimum wage of their own, whereas Australia’s national minimum wage, a country with similar demographics, is $16 per hour for a full time working adult.

Why aren't we equipped to deal with it? Dr. Shiller and even Angus Deaton co-discoverer with wife Ann Case of the exploding drug and suicide rates of non-college educated white adults, commenting on what he called the "grotesque expansions in inequality of the past 30 years," gave a pessimistic prediction: "Those who are doing well will organize to protect what they have, including in ways that benefit them at the expense of the majority."

And that has happened since the 1970s and the dominance of free market, so-called Laissez Faire ideologies that strove to cut taxes and government regulations for the sole purpose of protecting the wealth “at the expense of the majority” which has resulted in the election of Donald Trump twice.

Yet we do know how to level the playing field. We should reenact the labor laws of earlier years that allowed collective bargaining and disallowed the right to work laws in 25 states where a mass exodus from unions occurred with the loss of manufacturing jobs that paid higher wages and salaries. Then raise the income tax rate that prevailed before President Reagan succeeded in lowering taxes of the wealthiest 70 percent of Americans.

We could also pass real universal health coverage that all other countries enjoy. It would lower health costs--maybe to what it is in other developed countries, which is 50 percent less than Americans currently pay.

So, we do know how to enact economic programs that create a more equal society. European countries have succeeded via higher tax rates but provide many more services and at much cheaper costs than so-called private enterprise.

Private enterprise has been allowed to decimate the public good to such a degree that the CIA World Factbook showed an unpleasant fact; we are in danger of becoming a developing country in the company of other Third World, developed countries once again.

And because of it, the CIA announced this year the Trump administration is no longer allowing its publication, in a vain attempt to hide the damage over the last 30 years that such income inequality has done to our democracy.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Where's the Inflation?

Financial FAQs

“Economic activity is expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty that owes, in part, to the conflict in the Middle East…Inflation remains elevated relative to the Committee's 2 percent goal, in part reflecting supply shocks that have driven price increases in certain sectors, including energy.” FOMC

MarketWatch

New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh wouldn’t say when the Fed would join the chorus calling for a rate hike at his June press conference. He was waiting to hear from task forces studying problem! When have we heard this before?

The U.S. and Iran keep bombing each other, and Iran has just said they are in no hurry to negotiate another ceasefire, while Trump just found another way to keep tariffs high.

And the bond market and inflation indicators are showing higher inflation ahead. Is there any doubt that the Fed’s Fed Funds rate is going higher, as well, with the Fed’s FOMC statement mentioning “elevated uncertainty” re the Middle East conflict?

The financial markets didn’t like the Fed’s inaction, which is why the market indexes plunged after the FOMC statement—the DOW ended the day down by -1150 pts.

Yet economic disaster is staring Americans in the face, if Trump keeps raising tariffs and can’t stop his Gulf war. It cuts into consumer spending, raising the cost of everything when debt at all levels—national, corporate, and consumers are already at record levels.

Raising the Fed’s interest rate will slow rising inflation by slowing economic growth. The Fed FOMC conclusion that economic activity is “expanding at a solid case” was because of over investment in the AI build out of data centers, almost all of it borrowed money. And many of the AI investors are borrowing from and investing in each other, like Japan’s keiretsu system of interlocking ownerships that impeded them from writing off bad debts when their decades long economic stagnation occurred.

One ‘tell’ of the possibility of a US. recession is that huge new orders for computers and related products jumped 3.1% in June, the government said Monday in its monthly report on durable goods.

The last time there was such a surge in goods investment was during the dot-com era, according to MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash. “Over the past year, orders for the AI-related hardware have surged 17%, a level last sustained during the dot-com era more than a quarter of a century ago,” he said.

But the dot-com investments didn’t begin to show enough profit for decades to pay for the investments, hence the 2000 dot-com recession that Alan Greenspan and Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller predicted with their warning that irrational exuberance was blinding investors from reality.

Yet the Fed must act to raise rates sooner or later, since higher inflation is already embedded in consumer surveys, according to the University of Michigan’s sentiment survey:

“Year-ahead inflation expectations ticked down from 4.6% in June to a still-elevated 4.2% this month. The current reading substantially exceeds the 3.4% seen in February before the Iran conflict began, (my bold) along with all 2024 readings. Long-run inflation expectations held steady from last month at 3.3%, remaining a bit higher than the 2.8% to 3.2% range seen in 2024.”

The advance second quarter GDP growth estimate was just 1.5 percent, another casualty of the tariffs and Mideast wars despite the AI investment surge. It’s no wonder the Fed’s Governors are avoiding the obvious; when to begin to restrict credit before inflation becomes entrenched longer term, as it did in the 1970s.

What were the conditions then? Energy supplies were restricted, inflation soared, and economic growth stagnated. Hence the decade of stagflation. Is this a repeat?

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

 

Defeating The Greater Lawlessness

 Popular Economics Weekly

“The Republicans’ hunger for power has now reached such a point that they have selected and continue to support a president who has lied and cheated his whole adult life; from Trump Casinos to Trump Towers, from stiffing bankers and his workers to cooking the books.” H Green/Huffington Post

NYTimes

We knew as long ago as Nixon’s Watergate that the Republican Party harbored a lawless tendency when it suited them. Why else would President Reagan engineer the illicit Iran contra arms deal with Khomeini, or President GW Bush invade Iraq when UN inspectors already knew Saddam Hussein had destroyed his weapons of mass destruction a decade earlier, I said in 2017?

Now we have illegal tariffs and an unpopular war with Iran, one that will drive inflation even higher and might take years to return to the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target to fulfill its mandate of full employment with stable prices.

The result? Another recession, sooner or later, as happened during Presidents Reagan (2) and GW Bush terms. In Bush’s case, he managed to turn four years of Clinton budget surpluses (1996-2000) that could have kept social security and Medicare solvent for decades into a worldwide Great Recession (2008-09), the worst since the Great Depression, according to most economists.

President Trump’s Republicans are following the same path with his huge tax cuts while borrowing $trillions to fight his wars, cutting public services to the bone and closing whole departments by firing more than 300,000 federal employees.

Republicans have doubled down on their lawlessness by allowing his illegal wars and tariffs, and maybe what could precipitate the next recession; their determination to deport as many undocumented immigrants as possible without allowing them due process or a legal pathway to citizenship.

Immigrants are taxpayers that add workers to our shrinking population, and their loss is depriving our economy of essential services—agricultural workers that supply our groceries, for starters, but also a large part of construction, healthcare, transportation and lower paying service workers in leisure and hospitality.

This can only be done because Trump’s Republicans either ignore or disregard the civil laws, as well as economic laws, and even the constitution in their hunger for power. This is impoverishing more Americans, not to speak of turning a blind eye to the illegal enrichment of the Trump family and their supporters.

What can be done to return the $trillions in wealth and power that Republicans have taken away from the American people via their massive tax cuts to corporations and wars that were never paid and ignore the most basic rules of capitalist enterprise, such as debts must be paid, contracts and treaties honored?

The sad fact is that the Iran war wasn’t necessary because President Obama had already negotiated a nuclear arms agreement with Iran and Trump’s tariffs have been mostly based on ignorance of foreign trade tradeoffs, not unfair trade practices.

The history of greater lawlessness and hunger for more power is leading to a massive disruption in foreign trade which is the life blood of the world’s economies. It is repeating the mistakes that choked off world trade in 1930 and led to the Great Depression.

The question is how much longer will consumers and voters tolerate the record of Republicans’ failures that have led to four recessions just since 1980 that were the result of their hunger for more power?

Polls are showing that ordinary Americans are beginning to understand what it means.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Another Housing Bubble?

 The Mortgage Corner

“WASHINGTON (July 9, 2026) – Existing-home sales decreased by 2.4% month-over-month and increased 2.8% year-over-year, according to the National Association of REALTORS® Existing-Home Sales report. NAR

FRED30yrmortgage

It’s been months since I last wrote about the housing market, and why it’s had such a slow recovery. FRED’s 30-year fixed mortgage graph tells us why, and why we have a housing shortage.

And the 30-year fixed rate mortgage has hovered above 5 percent since 2023, its longest stretch above 5 percent since 2007 and the start of the Great Recession. Lower interest rates would certainly stimulate more housing construction, especially on the affordable end.

But new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has been repeating that inflation is too high at his congressional hearings and the Fed may have to make some hard choices and become an inflation hawk to bring inflation back to its 2 percent target rate.

If only we still had Ayn Rand disciple and free market lover Alan Greenspan as the Fed Chair! In a similar situation during the GW Bush 2000 decade, Fed Governors resisted raising the Fed rates to help fund the Bush administration’s wars on terror, despite enacting the large Republican tax cuts that caused the first $trillion in federal debt.

A caveat is to be careful what you wish for, since the last such building surge inflated the housing bubble for mostly the wrong reasons.

And the busted housing bubble that led to the Great Recession of 2008-09 also led to the current housing shortage. Can we ever return to the ‘good old days’ when there was enough housing for those that want to own?

It fueled an earlier housing bubble It was the combination of interest rates being held below rising inflation that caused housing prices to increase by double digits for a couple of years and we were left when a massive oversupply of unsold homes.

Right now we have both a demand and supply problem—how to bring down mortgage rates to lure more home buyers, and kick start more housing construction.

The Trump administration is also attempting to talk down interest rates in the face of its massive tax cuts as it has been waging war on several fronts—from attacking Venezuela to Iran, while again ballooning the federal debt.

The 30-year average fixed mortgage was last at a much more affordable 3 percent rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is 6.58 percent at this writing and has remained above 6 percent since 2022 when the Fed last raised interest rates to combat inflation as world economies began to recover from COVID.

And we know both home buyers and mortgage lenders are incredibly sensitive to mortgage rates, in part because mortgage lenders have kept credit standards much higher than they were in the lead up to the housing bubble that caused so many defaults. Anyone remember the no-income verification, liar loans of that time?

The National Association of Realtors remain hopeful that the home buyer market will approve.

"The back-and-forth in monthly home sales activity, driven by mild fluctuations in mortgage rates, shows how sensitive home buyers are to affordability conditions,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. “However, job gains—more than half a million since the beginning of the year—will continue to provide support for the housing market.”

But so much is similar to the housing bubble and bust. Trump’s Big Beautiful Tax Bill and Iran war is raising the costs of everything as did Bush’s tax cuts and war on terror.

Are we seeing a housing revival with the slight uptick in existing home sales? Hope springs eternal, as the saying goes. Sales have hovered around 4 million residential units since the busted housing bubble and 2008-09 Great Recession. There has never been enough supply to satisfy the demand of an increasing population since then because the busted housing bubble restricted new home building for almost 10 years, and 30-year fixed rate mortgages have hovered above 6 percent ever since, per the FRED graph.

Higher interest rates are raising construction costs. Trump’s tariffs on steel, copper, lumber and other materials are lifting construction prices and interrupting some jobs. This is while immigration enforcement is worsening worker shortages and delaying projects.

I said last week,

“We get so many things thrown at us in the construction industry,” said Tony Rader, the chief relationship officer at National Roofing Partners, a commercial roofing company in Coppell, Texas. “It just seems like every time we turn around, we’ve got something else to fight.”

The bottom line is too many resources have been diverted to funding wars, not peaceful enterprises since then, leaving little room for more housing construction, or curing our homeless problem.

When will that change?

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen