What Gulf War?

 Financial FAQs

“From the preceding month, the PCE price index for January increased 0.3 percent. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 0.4 percent. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 3.1 percent from one year ago.” BEA.gov

FREDBrentcrude

Oil prices spiked again on Thursday morning (to $94.35 per barrel) per the above graph on Brent crude oil prices, after Iran’s new leader said the crucial Strait of Hormuz should remain closed and that Iran will continue attacks on its Gulf neighbors,.

And the Fed’s favored inflation index, the Personal Consumption Expenditures core rate of inflation, which omits food and energy, rose by 0.4%. The core rate rose 3.1% in the 12 months ended in January, up from 3.0% in the prior month. It’s the highest rate in almost two years and decidedly not what the Fed wanted to see.

So, this is causing all the financial market indexes to plunge once again as it’s becoming increasingly obvious that Trump has no good reason for attacking Iran that is now morphing into another Gulf War.

“The war in the Middle East is creating the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market,” said the IEA in its March report released on Thursday that was cited by MarketWatch. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have caused Gulf countries to cut total oil production by at least 10 million barrels per day, the energy body added.

So why shouldn’t President Trump’s new Gulf War repeat the 1970’s Arab Oil Embargo (OPEC) stagflation—slowing economic growth + higher inflation—that caused several recessions and resulted in the double-digit inflation of the era, I said last week.

I’m not the only one bringing up the similarities to 1970’s stagflation. Nobel economist Joseph Stigliz, a Clinton economic advisor who won the Nobel prize for economics in 2001, said in a podcast interview with Jack Farley of “Monetary Matters” released on Wednesday, that “We are facing a risk of stagflation with prices going up because of tariffs and war while growth is slowing.” The 92,000 nonfarm payrolls contraction in February was evidence for the slump in economic activity, he said.

And it’s beginning to show up in slower GDP growth. Real gross domestic product (GDP) barely increased at an annual rate of 0.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2025, revised downward from 1.4 percent, according to the second estimate released today by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP increased 4.4 percent.

BEA.gov

Oil prices had spiked earlier in June 2025 to $80 per barrel because of the short-lived Israel-U.S. strikes on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities. That should have been a warning of the potential economic damage from a longer war.

The other shoe to drop will be job creation. We are already in a stagnant job market with the loss of -92,000 jobs in February that basically erased the +126,000 job gain in January. Further losses are being hinted at by other indicators, such as the government’s JOLTS report that has shown no net growth in new hires for months.

It’s becoming more obvious that President Trump’s seeming incoherence over the reasons for his new Gulf war is hiding the real reason he started another Gulf War that he blurted out recently:

“The United States is the largest Oil Producer in the World, by far, so when oil prices go up, we make a lot of money,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

The sad truth is that Trump and his oil buddies are profiteering from a war that Americans, and much of the world, will end up paying for.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

The Return of Stagflation

 The Mortgage Corner

“From the same month one year ago, the PCE price index for June increased 2.6 percent. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 2.8 percent from one year ago.” BEA.gov

FREDpceinflation

President Trump hasn’t succeeded in convincing the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates or fired Chairman Jerome Powell just yet. So he fired the head of the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics without cause that published the weak July unemployment report instead.

It is heralding another era of stagflation that has destroyed the wealth of too many Americans.

It now looks like he wants to recreate what happened to two other Republican Presidents—manipulating the data to disguise the fact that looming inflation can be a big problem as it was in the stagflation of the 1970s and housing bubble and Great Recession of 2008 that was the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

President Nixon first tried it when combatting the looming oil price-inspired inflation from the Arab Oil Embargo by fixing prices to keep them artificially low, then pushed his Fed Chair Arthur Burns to keep interest rates low in the face of slowing economic growth caused by the OPEC embargo.

It resulted in 14 percent inflation in 1980 that caused then Fed Chair Paul Volcker to raise the Fed Funds rate to 20 percent, resulting in two recessions early in President Reagan’s tenure.

President GW Bush also tried it in 2000 by pushing then Fed Chair Alan Greenspan to keep interest rates low to finance his wars on terror. Greenspan held interest rates too low for too long, which resulted in the housing bubble and Great Recession that followed.

And now Trump is looking for a successor to the Senate-vetted BLS official, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who will manipulate employment statistics for him. The result will be less trusted unemployment reports, masking the effects of historically high tariffs that will again create product shortages and slow economic growth.

The Labor Department’s unemployment report understated what happened in the past three months, as I said last week. The U.S. economy created 73,000 nonfarm payroll jobs, but just 19,000 and 14,000 payroll jobs in revisions to May and June totals when more data came in (see graph).

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for May was revised down by 125,000, from +144,000 to +19,000, and the change for June was revised down by 133,000, from +147,000 to +14,000, per the BLS.

Trump’s main reason for wanting to manipulate economic facts? He also wants to hide the damage to the employment numbers from what could be the loss of one million immigrants leaving the adult labor force, many of them running for cover because of the Gestapo tactics of Trump’s Homeland Security masked Storm Troopers breaking into homes and businesses to round up as many undocumented immigrants as possible, as I said last Friday.

It’s really the first indication of the immigrant’s importance in our economy, and why most of July’s hiring was in healthcare (55,000) while government employment lost 12.000 jobs and -87,000 jobs this year.

The next economic shoe to drop will be the changing of the guard at the Federal Reserve. Trump could not bully Fed Chair Powell to lower interest rates sooner, but that will soon change when he appoints a new Fed Chairman.

He will want to politicize the Fed as he is doing to the rest of the federal government when Powell steps down next year, so that he can enact more Republican ‘trickle down’ economic policies first initiated by President Reagan: in particular the tax cuts + deregulation that supposedly increases efficiencies and productivity, but instead increased corporate CEO pay to more than 300 times that of their employees while weakening union collective bargaining laws.

The results of ‘trickle-down’ economics have been frightfully obvious for decades. The Reagan-era creation has succeeded in maximizing profits of the owners of capital and corporate CEOs while suppressing incomes of salaried workers via right to work laws and low minimum wages, mostly in the poorest Republican controlled red states.

It’s why economists are now calling this the second Gilded Age. We are seeing the results—higher inflation and slowing economic growth once again unless a majority of Americans can be convinced to stop the steal of the worst robber baron of all.

Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Can We Prevent Stagflation?

 Popular Economics Weekly

During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations…The onset of the embargo contributed to an upward spiral in oil prices with global implications. The price of oil per barrel first doubled, then quadrupled, imposing skyrocketing costs on consumers and structural challenges to the stability of whole national economies. history,state.gov

BEA.gov

The 1970s stagflation, a combination of stagnant growth and high inflation, was not a happy time. It caused then Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker to raise the Fed Funds rate to as high as 20 percent to tame the inflation tiger in the 1980s and many bank failures.  

It might happen again, but not because of an energy shortage. Friday’s report on the Commerce Department’s Personal Consumption Expenditure Index (PCE) raised alarms that inflation was on the rise, which is one of the two main components of stagflation. Inflation hasn’t been tamed, as it rose 2.5 percent, 2.8 percent without food and energy prices, per the BEA graph.

Stagflation last happened in the 1970s because of the 1973-74 Arab oil embargo that caused gas stations to run out of gas and consumer prices to soar. It ultimately resulted in a 14.8 percent CPI inflation rate in 1980. And it was more than a decade before inflation and interest rates dropped back to single digits, and we lived through three recessions.

This was also the beginning of the Second Gilded Age so well documented by political scientists Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson in Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class that was initiated by President Reagan and supported by the Business Roundtable of Chief corporate Executives.

It began the huge transfer of wealth from wage earning Americans to the owners of capital with successive tax cuts and restrictions on labor organizing, as well as the massive deregulation of industries such as the airlines and telecommunications.

US Corporations took advantage of the globalization of technologies and began the massive move of factories overseas, along with the blue-collar jobs that had built middle America, to countries with cheaper wages and fewer environmental regulations.

The gutting of rust belt jobs in the Midwest resulted in the red state-blue state split we have today, with right to work laws in those states that restrict the right of unions to collect dues from their members, many with wages still stuck at the national $7.25 per hour minimum wage.

This is while economic growth, the other main element of stagflation, is slowing. Why? Consumers are not happy with the high prices and economic uncertainty caused by Trump’s tariffs and Elon Musk’s DOGE massive job cuts, so they aren’t spending as they did in the past, and consumers are the main driver of economic growth.

The loss of tens of thousands of federal jobs and depopulating the service sector industry, the fastest growing economic sector that depends on undocumented workers, will do the same.

This is reflected in falling consumer confidence. The University of Michigan’s final February survey said: “Consumer sentiment extended its early month decline, sliding nearly 10% from January. The decrease was unanimous across groups by age, income, and wealth. All five index components deteriorated this month, led by a 19% plunge in buying conditions for durables, in large part due to fears that tariff induced price increases are imminent.

All of these factors make a reduction in first quarter economic growth more likely. In fact, the Atlanta Fed’s estimate of first quarter growth declined further into negative territory.

The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2025 is -2.8 percent on March 28, down from -1.8 percent on March 26. The alternative model forecast, which adjusts for imports and exports of gold as described here, is -0.5 percent.

Can we prevent a recurrence, in which we again have double digit inflation and slow to no growth? Trump would have to learn how to negotiate with congress rather than issue unlawful executive orders and take away Elon Musk’s chainsaw for that to happen.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

What Stagflation?

 Financial FAQs

TradingEconomics

U.S. service sector activity that powers two-thirds of economic activity (above graph) is surging more than ever, according to the Institute of Supply Management non-manufacturing survey. It is growing per 58.3 percent of managers surveyed, with the index for employment and new orders even higher. New orders rose 4 points to 60.1 percent, and production activity also edged higher.

“In March, the Services PMI® registered 58.3 percent, a 1.8-percentage point increase compared to the February reading of 56.5 percent," said Anthony Neeves, Chair of the Institute for Supply Management^®. "The 12-month average is 62.3percent, which reflects consistently strong growth in the services sector. The March reading indicates the services sector grew for the 22nd consecutive month after two months of contraction and 122 months of growth before that. A reading above 50 percent indicates the services sector economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates the services sector is generally contracting.”

So this doesn’t look like impending stagflation, the wage-price spiral that happened in the 1970s and pushed inflation to record highs, while growth came to a standstill.

Pundits and some banks that forecast a future wage-price spiral seem to have forgotten that it took consecutive Arab (OPEC) oil embargoes in the 1970s causing gasoline shortages and long lines at gas stations for almost a decade to make that happen.

Whereas the Ukraine war and its concomitant sanctions are less than two months old. Why should we even be worrying about prolonged inflation, and what the Fed might do to tame it, when we don’t know whether this war will last for months, or years, and what will be needed to win it?

Predictions of a looming recession are premature, so say the least. Both the service and manufacturing sectors are booming, while supply chains are struggling to catch up and replenish inventories.

This is while the jobs market is red hot with more returning to work. New U.S. jobless claims matched a 54-year low of 166,000 in early April, for instance — the second lowest reading in history— during a period of remarkably strong hiring and the lowest layoffs on record.

The ISM’s service sector employment index increased to 54% from 48.5%. Businesses got no relief from inflation, however. The prices-paid index moved up to 83.8% from 83.1%, just a tick below a record high.

What will help to tame the inflation tiger? More workers returning to work will increase production, replenishing inventories. And governments will be increasing their spending, as well, due to the Ukraine war. This will stimulate further production increases.

MarketWatch columnist Jeffry Bartash maintains what was called the “Great Resignation” is over, a time since the pandemic when workers were reluctant to return to work.

“To be sure, Americans have been saying “I quit” in record numbers,” said Bartash. “Almost 57 million people left jobs — many more than once — in the 14-month period from January 2021 to February 2022. That’s a 25% spike vs. a similar time span before the pandemic.”

The hiring wave began more than a year ago. The U.S. added 431,000 new jobs in March, the government said last week, extending a streak of large job gains going back to the start of 2021. The unemployment rate also sank to 3.6 percent last month — just a tick above a 53-year-low — from nearly 15 percent just two years ago.

“All of the hiring took place against the backdrop of high covid cases and the reluctance of millions of formerly employed people to return to the labor market. Hiring might have taken place even faster, economists say, if the pandemic had petered out and generous government unemployment benefits were ended sooner,” continued Bartash.

So maybe we can endure a bit more inflation if the red hot demand that’s causing it is bringing more people into the workforce and helping Ukraine to win its war?

Harlan Green © 2022

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

2020—A Year of Living Dangerously

Popular Economics Weekly 

FRED.gov

There is plenty of speculation on the effects of killing Iran’s Quds Force General Qassem Suleimani. Of course the first question is how Iran will retaliate? But terrorist attacks by its proxies, such as Iraqi militias that were bombed by the U.S., should be the least of our worries.

More important is the effect on world oil prices and economic growth in general, since the only reason the U.S. economy is continuing to grow is very low inflation coupled with very low, recession level interest rates. And that can’t be maintained if oil prices spike for some reason.

Texas intermediate crude prices per barrel stayed in the $100 per barrel range from 2011 to 2015, per the above FRED graph, before coming down to the $50-$60 range in 2015. It was a major reason economic growth hasn’t risen above 2 percent this decade.

I say recession-level rates, since current interest rates were last this low during the Great Recession. The Federal Reserve had to lower interest rates three times last year to boost growth since the manufacturing component has been shrinking for the past 4 months, according to the ISM’s Manufacturing survey.

Wrightson.com

We are skating on thin ice, economically speaking. There were dangerous signals in 2018 when the Fed was raising interest rates to slow down what it saw as incipient inflation and had to reverse course. The stock market plunged, because money was no longer cheap, and it raised fears of such a oncoming recession.

So the unique combination of low rates plus low inflation has kept the U.S. growing in the 11^th year of this recovery from the Great Recession, which is the longest post—World War II recovery on record.

But past history has shown low inflation and interest rates cannot last forever. In fact, as the above FRED CPI retail inflation graph shows, the Federal Reserve has been more than proactive on keeping inflation at the 2-2.5 percent range since 1980, when it reached 12.5 percent because of soaring oil prices in the 1970s 

Anyone remember the Arab oil embargo and long lines at gas stations when OPEC cut off oil supplies to the U.S.?  The result was back-to-back recessions in 1981-82, and another recession in 1991 during the Desert Storm invasion of Kuwait, and just before the 9/11 Trade Center bombings.

The question may not be skyrocketing oil prices now, since the U.S. in now domestically producing more than 7 million barrels per day. But economic growth is already slowing with the tariff wars that have cut foreign trading by almost 25 percent, the UK’s Brexit battle, and now a possible Middle East war. Iran has many ways to create more trouble.

Then why has the U.S. been killing Iran’s leading general and Iraqi militia commanders in the recent drone attacks? Reuters is reporting that Iran-backed militias had already been planning attacks on U.S. installations and civilians with advanced weaponry brought in from Iran.

Whether such intelligence is true or not, a new Middle East war may have already begun.

Harlan Green © 2019

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen