Republicans Don't Pay Their Bills

 Financial FAQs

“The new law will reduce federal revenues by significant amounts, even after allowing for the impact on economic growth. It will make the distribution of after-tax income more unequal. If it is not financed with concurrent spending cuts or other tax increases, TCJA (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) will raise federal debt and impose burdens on future generations. If it is financed with spending cuts or other tax increases, TCJA will, under the most plausible scenarios, end up making most households worse off than if it had not been enacted.” Brookings

How times have changed! Republicans during the Eisenhower era paid for the deficits their tax cuts caused. The Brookings Institution analysis of Donald Trump’s 2018 Tax Cut and Jobs Act has US households paying for it because it added some $4 trillion to our federal debt even “if it is financed with spending cuts or other tax increases.”

The 90 percent corporate tax rate and 92 percent maximum personal tax rate of the Eisenhower era paid for the “new hires, new equipment, and product research which are deductible from taxable earnings.”

In other words, the higher tax rates made corporations use their profits to finance their own growth, rather than pay Uncle Sam. Whereas today the TCJA tax cuts will mostly finance corporate stock buybacks.

And Trump wants to renew the TCJA when it expires this year, which the Congressional Budget Office says will add at least another $4 trillion to our national debt.

It doesn’t have to be this way. The Clinton/Gore government downsizing of the 1990s created four years of budget surpluses, because they negotiated with congress to make the cuts, because they were congressionally mandated programs.

“Unlike the current effort, the cutting didn't start until they had gone through a six-month study process and developed a blueprint of how to best reinvent the federal government,” said a recent Newsweek article on the subject. “Government agencies were brought into the process to determine the best ways that efficiencies could be realized. In fact, the effort was led by some 250 federal employees that remained on their agency payrolls.”

The federal workforce was reduced by close to 400,000 employees between 1993 and 2000, or about 17 percent of the total. The cuts made the government the smallest it had been since the Eisenhower administration, according to the Newsweek report.

Who do the Trump tax cuts benefit? Corporations and households in the top 5% — who earn more than $450,000 a year, roughly — are the “biggest winners.” They’d get over 45% of the benefits of extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, according to a July 2024 analysis by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and would reduce federal tax revenues by $4.4 trillion by 2035.

So why would Republicans want to reduce federal revenues when we have a $36 trillion national budget deficit that is 120 percent of GDP?

It’s because Republicans don’t want to pay their bills rather than provide social services and environmental protection that would benefit all Americans. That’s their history from at least 1980 when President Reagan declared that “government was the problem” and immediately fired the federal air traffic controllers who were striking for higher pay and better working conditions.

We know how that turned out with the latest brouhaha over Musk’s slashing of the already understaffed FAA workforce that regulates airline travel.

President Eisenhower would have turned over in his grave, if he knew this would happen to the Republican Party.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen