Falling Households Incomes—The Real ‘Fiscal Cliff’

Popular Economics Weekly

It is household income that is falling off a cliff. This is partly due to the busted housing bubble and subsequent Great Recession that shaved 40 percent from household wealth. But household incomes haven’t been rising as fast as inflation since the 1970s, either. So we should be worrying about the drastic decline in buying power, rather than Congress’s inability to agree on a federal budget, if we want to cure the looming ‘fiscal cliff’.

If we don’t find a way to improve average household finances, Americans could plunge into decades of slow growth and the continued deterioration in their standard of living. Why? We are a consumer society, so that 70 percent of U.S. economic growth is powered by consumer spending. That is why government has to be part of the solution.

Three-fifths of all jobs lost during the Great Recession paid middle-income wages, while those created during the economic recovery pay low wages, according to a new study by the National Employment Law Project. Both economic forces and government budget cuts are causing this deficit of good jobs, according to the study.

For instance, many of the losses in well-paying jobs came from state and local governments, which have cut 485,000 jobs since February 2010, NELP found. Many mid-wage government workers that have been laid off during the economic recovery include teachers and police officers.

There is an easy way to reverse the downward spiral in wages—begin to upgrade our aging public services. In what New York Times Nicholas Kristof has labeled A Failed Experiment, the World Economic Forum ranks American infrastructure 25^th in the world, down from 8^th in 2003-4.

One would think with the ongoing drought, Tsumanis, and Hurricane Sandy that we would know how important government is to the solution of our many problems. New Jersey Governor Chris Christy certainly thought so in lauding President Obama for his help during Sandy. So the most obvious place to start is a national program to repair our crumbling infrastructure that the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates needs at least $2.2 Trillion in repairs and upgrades over the next 5 years just to keep it safe.

The wealthy have always had an answer to the ongoing decrepitude of public services, said Kristof. “Public playgrounds and tennis courts decrepit? Never mind—just join a private tennis club. I’m used to seeing this mind-set in developing countries like Chad or Pakistan, where the feudal rich make do behind high walls topped with shards of glass; increasingly, I see it in our country.”

The ASCE has launched a new series of reports that take a closer look at the economic impacts of America’s deteriorating infrastructure. These economic studies look forward to 2020 and 2040 to predict impacts on GDP, personal income, and jobs if current infrastructure investment trends continue. 

The first report was released in July 2011 and focused on surface transportation. The landmark study, Failure to Act: The Economic Impact of Current Investment Trends in Surface Transportation Infrastructure, found the nation’s deteriorating surface transportation infrastructure will cost the American economy more than 870,000 jobs, and suppress the growth of the country’s Gross Domestic Product by $897 billion by 2020. Commissioned by ASCE and conducted by the Economic Development Research Group of Boston, the report shows that the nation is facing a funding gap of about $94 billion a year compared with our current spending levels.

In fact Nobel Economist Joseph Stiglitz asserts in a recent Project Syndicate blog that “Spending, especially on investments in education, technology, and infrastructure, can actually lead to lower long-term deficits.”

Most of the federal ‘fiscal cliff’ was created by borrowing to finance serial tax cuts and increased military spending that benefited the few at the expense of the many, instead of shoring up social security and Medicare reserves, as Bush Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill advocated.

In fact, those tax revenues were diverted to the real ‘takers’, the wealthiest Wall Street financiers and corporate CEOs who have managed to capture most of the created wealth over the last decades. Just in 2009, it’s well documented that 93 percent of the income increase went to the top 1 percent of income earners through lower dividend and capital gains taxes, as well as record corporate profits.

But that means taking political power back from the elites who would rather starve government programs that could boost middle class incomes and consumers, asserts Chrystia Freeland in Plutocrats, The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. Plutocrats are putting the wealth accumulated from deregulation of the U.S. economy into developing the middle classes of developing countries such as India, China, and Brazil, rather than the U.S.

Need we say more? Should we continue to allow the private good to trump public good? Not unless we enjoy reverting back to conditions like those in the developing world.

Harlan Green © 2012

The Confidence Fairies Love Austerity

Popular Economics Weekly

January’s economic numbers are in, so we can say government stimulus spending has worked; there is just not enough of it. Whereas the views of those Paul Krugman characterizes as “confidence fairies” doesn’t work. Austerity and budget cutting during recessions doesn’t boost growth for the simplest of reasons—consumers and private sector businesses can’t spend the money they don’t have.

The confidence fairies so loved by small government types somehow believe when budget deficits are reduced that businesses and consumers will invest and spend more. But how, when workers are laid off and salaries cut to achieve that result? This results in lower incomes, so lower spending, hence lower demand for the very goods and services that would spur growth.

The U.S. now seems to be entering a virtuous growth cycle just because we didn’t follow the advice of the confidence fairies. Increased stimulus spending has increased hiring, causing in turn increased demand, which then spurs more hiring, and so on. Whereas the Eurozone economies are falling into another recession.

 

Paul Krugman has been telling Europeans what would happen if EU leaders continued to listen to their confidence fairies: “Specifically, in early 2010 austerity economics — the insistence that governments should slash spending even in the face of high unemployment — became all the rage in European capitals. The doctrine asserted that the direct negative effects of 00spending cuts on employment would be offset by changes in “confidence,” that savage spending cuts would lead to a surge in consumer and business spending, while nations failing to make such cuts would see capital flight and soaring interest rates. If this sounds to you like something Herbert Hoover might have said, you’re right: It does and he did.”

So it is our experience with the Great Depression and President Roosevelt’s New Deal that has kept us from following the path of austerity economics, even in the face of continued cries for less government involvement in our recovery. That doesn’t work, as ‘Hoovernomics’ proved. In fact, it was GW Bush’s attempts to follow Hoover’s path that led us into the Great Recession. Bush decided on all those tax breaks, instead of using Clinton’s 4 years of budget surpluses to fix social security and Medicare, resulting in the largest budget deficits since Ronald Reagan, told in telling detail by Bush Treasury Secretary Paul ONeill and Ron Susskind in The Price of Loyalty.

Meanwhile, the U.S. economy continues to grow. Retail sales are one of the best indicators of consumers’ financial health. Excluding autos, retail sales surged 0.7 percent in January after decreasing 0.5 percent in December (due to lower auto sales, said the report). But that may be an anomaly due to a small sampling of auto dealers, because other data show auto sales have been increasing. The Fed’s January Industrial Production report said the output of motor vehicles and parts surged 6.8 percent following an upwardly revised increase of 3.8 percent in December.

Graph: Econoday

Overall industrial production was unchanged in January after a 1.0 percent jump the month before, but the manufacturing component jumped 0.7 percent, following a 1.5 percent comeback in December.  In January, utilities dropped 2.5 percent while mining output declined 1.8 percent, was the reason for overall production being flat. The manufacturing sector was strong in several Fed regions. Both the Empire State (New York Fed), and Philly Fed manufacturing surveys jumped.

Graph: Econoday

These factors also led the index of leading economic indicators to a solid 0.4 percent gain in January following upwardly revised gains of 0.5 and 0.3 percent in the prior two months. Other areas showing strength in January include credit activity and building permits, gains that underscore the improving outlook for the housing and construction sectors.

Graph: Econoday

What makes me think this is really a virtuous growth cycle, rather than another early-in-the-year spurt that might die later is that the nation's inventories are lean and well managed—meaning there are no headwinds from excess inventories. Business inventories rose a moderate 0.4 percent in December, below the 0.7 percent rise for sales and pulling down the stock-to-sales ratio by 1 tenth to 1.26. That means demand is keeping up with production, since the stock-to-sale ratio hasn’t increased.

Graph: Econoday

“Now the results are in”, says Krugman, “and they’re exactly what three generations’ worth of economic analysis and all the lessons of history should have told you would happen. The confidence fairy has failed to show up: none of the countries slashing spending have seen the predicted private-sector surge. Instead, the depressing effects of fiscal austerity have been reinforced by falling private spending.”

“Look, I understand why influential people are reluctant to admit that policy ideas they thought reflected deep wisdom actually amounted to utter, destructive folly. But it’s time to put delusional beliefs about the virtues of austerity in a depressed economy behind us.”

Harlan Green © 2012