The Japan Tariffs

 Financial FAQs

“It has been clear for a while that Trump and co. don’t understand or believe in balance of payments accounting, that they want both a smaller trade deficit and more foreign investment in America. Now their basic lack of understanding is embodied in a specific deal.” Paul Krugman

FREDtradedeficit

Why not quote Paul Krugman, who won a Nobel Prize for his research on foreign trade? The just announced trade deal with Japan is another illustration of the Trump administration’s ignorance of basic economic principles that will make both countries poorer.

It’s necessary to get into the ‘weeds’ of economic principles for those that want to understand just what the Trump administration is really up to; enriching the few with tax cuts that are paid for by all Americans in the higher prices that will result.

Although Japan will be building more factories in the U.S. with its $550 billion in announced investments and be able to export more Japanese vehicles to Americans, U.S. autoworkers will be hurt because Japanese autos will be cheaper than vehicles manufactured in the U.S, even with the 15 percent tariffs levied on them.

Why so? Because the parts imported and used in U.S. manufactured autos have higher tariffs, such as the 50 percent tariff on imported steel and aluminum products that go into American-made autos. That’s why the U.S, Autoworkers Union will have something to say about such a tariff agreement that will endanger the livelihoods of Ford, Stellantis, and GM’s unionized autoworkers.

GM President Mary Ybarra just announced that $1.1 billion of its $2 billion net income from second quarter earnings will be ‘eaten’ by the higher tariff costs that GM didn’t want to pass on to consumers.

The FRED graph illustrates the historical ups and downs of the historical trade imbalance of goods and services. The downward trending red line basically tracks the negative gap between imports and exports. It has been trending down because we are a consumer-driven economy that has historically imported much more than American businesses export.

The deepest trade deficit (steep drop in red line) occurred with a surge in imports January-March 2025 to get ahead of Trump’s threatened reciprocal tariffs on April 2. But when he announced the reciprocal tariffs—China’s was 145%, for instance—imports dried up and the difference narrowed so that the graph line rose quickly to the $60 to $70 billion historical trade deficit.

It's an illustration of the incredible gyrations that such chaos injects into foreign trade with Trump’s negotiating tactics, and which hurts small businesses most that depend on imports for consumer products, as well as retail giants like Walmart and Target.

The earliest effect on tariff-induced inflation apppeared in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) I reported last week. The prices of retail goods and services rose to 2.7 percent in June from a four-year low of 2.4 percent, which is why the Fed is still on hold with further rate cuts. It fears that lowering their Fed funds short-term rate could trigger an inflation panic, since it would speed up economic activity.

This would in turn panic bond holders who fear higher inflation and demand higher rates that control mortgages and yields on Treasury securities that fund the national debt, when the annual debt payments are $1 trillion.

Consumers can tolerate some higher inflation and maintain spending if the job market is good. Retail sales just rebounded in June and initial jobless claims for unemployment benefits are down again. Should the unemployment report remain in the low 4.2-4.3 percent range, consumers can keep spending despite uncertainty. But confidence polls are showing consumers are beginning to see the ultimate cost of higher tariffs—reduced social services and a worsening climate.

And this is before the appeal by the Trump administration of the Foreign Trade Court ruling that all reciprocal tariffs must be approved by the congress is decided! How is anyone to know what the final tariffs will be, in that case?

And how can he keep his promise to lower inflation while he keeps hounding the Fed to lower interest rates sooner (that would boost inflation)? He can’t keep his promise, in a word, because of his need to cut taxes. So he will raise everyone’s cost of living to pay for tax cuts that will benefit the few.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Second Quarter Growth Estimates Decline

 Popular Economics Weekly

“The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the second quarter of 2025 is 2.4 percent on July 18, unchanged from July 17 after rounding. After this morning’s housing starts release from the US Census Bureau, the nowcast of second-quarter real residential investment growth decreased from -6.4 percent to -7.0 percent.” Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank

AtlantaFed

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate of second quarter growth is why the Federal Reserve may drop interest rates at their September FOMC meeting if estimates for second quarter growth continue to decline (green line in graph). There is hope that the second quarter would look better than Q1’s negative -0.5% shrinkage. But that was based on the premise that there would be actual tariff agreements.

And now Trump is threatening Brazil with 50 percent tariffs over ex-President Bolsanaro’s criminal conviction.

We will see the first official estimate of second quarter economic growth on July 31, but most economists are warning of the uncertainty affecting growth predictions. The DOGE cost-cutting was meant to increase efficiency, but in fact is reducing it by eviscerating programs that only the federal government can do.

Much of it is being cut from scientific research that is the seed corn for the future prosperity and safety of Americans, for instance. There are large cuts in Health & Human Service for future disease cures (medical research), the USEPA in climate research, and even climate forecasting. FEMA cost-cutting made it slow to respond to the Kerrville, Texas flash flood, and unprepared to save more lives.

The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) that predicts future growth is also turning negative, despite Republican touts that Trump’s just passed Terrible Tax Bill will boost growth from the many tax breaks and reduced regulations being handed to corporations.

“The US LEI fell further in June,” said Justyna Zabinska-La Monica, Senior Manager, Business Cycle Indicators, at The Conference Board. “For a second month in a row, the stock price rally was the main support of the LEI. But this was not enough to offset still very low consumer expectations, weak new orders in manufacturing, and a third consecutive month of rising initial claims for unemployment insurance.”

Stocks have been rallying of late on the belief that TACO Trump will ultimately relent on many of his tariff threats that would boost inflation and reduce the likelihood of lower interest rates that businesses and consumers have been hoping for.

Consumers will still be the final arbiter of Q2 growth since they make up 70 percent of GDP, and they are now timing the tariff announcements. Retail sales had declined in May but picked up in June when it looked like any tariff hikes would be delayed once more.

Lower tariffs would certainly be better for future growth, since consumers also like it that way.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

When Will Housing Recover?

 The Mortgage Corner

“Overall, I expect tariffs to boost inflation by about 1 percentage point over the second half of this year and the first part of next year,” John Williams, New York Fed President.

 

NPR

Such remarks mirror what many of the Fed Governors who vote on interest rates are saying. Expectations for higher interest rates abound as a result of the inflation expectations. It’s why the housing market may have to wait until next year to recover. The 30-year fixed mortgage rate is still hovering close to 7 percent, which is keeping first-time buyers out of the housing market and elevating rental rates.

There are other reasons to wait, of course. The housing shortage, a lingering victim of the slow recovery from the Great Recession’s busted housing bubble, is keeping home prices from declining.

And President Trump’s on-and-off attempts to bully Fed President Jerome Powell and the 12 Fed Governors to lower interest rates isn’t succeeding, despite Trump’s daily insults.

It’s another version of TACO Trump’s negotiating skills. He only knows how to bully, which is why he has left a trail of bankruptcies and lawsuits throughout his business career. But Trump keeps denying he is about to fire the Fed Chairman that he appointed in his first term.

It’s also why Trump and his allies claim tariffs are not causing inflation, and the president saying, “inflation is dead” so he can justify his push for rate cuts. Trump has called on the Fed to slash interest rates by as much as 1%, with the Fed’s benchmark rate still in the 4.25%-4.5% range.

That will ultimately happen because there is almost unanimity among economists that the tariffs will make everything more expensive, which will ultimately slow growth enough to require the Fed to act.

Realtors and some economists are also calling for lower mortgage rates to strengthen the housing market. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics is worried “Housing will … soon be a full-blown headwind to broader economic growth,” he wrote in a post on X and LinkedIn, “adding to the growing list of reasons to be worried about the economy’s prospects later this year and early next,” as cited by MarketWatch.

There is a slight hope that home sales might improve this year, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Pending home sales—that are homes under contract but not closed—increased by 1.8% in May from the prior month and 1.1% year-over-year, according to the National Association of REALTORS® Pending Home Sales report.

"Consistent job gains and rising wages are modestly helping the housing market," said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. "Hourly wages are increasing faster than home prices. However, mortgage rate fluctuations are the primary driver of homebuying decisions and impact housing affordability more than wage gains.”

Existing-home sales have been stagnant for years, hovering around 4 million annual sales since January 2022 when the Fed first began to raise interest rates, but were up +0.8% from April to a seasonally adjusted rate of 4.03 million in May 2025. Sales declined 0.7% year-over-year, however.

When will builders have enough confidence to build more homes, including affordably priced homes? New home sales, which constitute approximately 13.4% of all US home sales, dropped 13.7% in May 2025 to a seven-month low of 623,000 units. This decline was the largest since June 2022.

Builder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes was 34 in May, down six points from April, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). This ties the November 2023 reading and is the lowest since the index hit 31 in December 2022.

Interest rates must eventually come down because as Mark Zandi says, poor housing sales are already a “full-blown head wind” to higher growth and the Fed will have to act to counter the added ‘head wind’ from the tariffs.

But how long must we wait for that to happen, and will it be soon enough to prevent something even more serious from happening?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Inflation Week is Here

Financial FAQs

“The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis in June, after rising 0.1 percent in May, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.7 percent before seasonal adjustment.” BLS.GOV

FREDcpi

June is the month that the Trump tariffs are beginning to raise the price of imported goods, which is pushing the inflation rate higher.

The first inflation report is the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on retail goods and services (see graph). It rose to 2.7 percent in June from a four-year low of 2.4 percent, which is why the Fed is still on hold with further rate cuts. It fears that lowering their Fed funds short-term rate could trigger an inflation panic, since it would speed up economic activity.

This would in turn panic bond holders who fear higher inflation and demand higher rates that control mortgages and yields on Treasury securities that fund the national debt, when annual debt payments are already $1 trillion.

Gas prices and housing costs rose. Prices fell for new and used vehicles, hotels and airfares. So, the inflation problem is with goods, while the service sector price declines showed that consumers are dining out and traveling less because of the uncertainties generated by a tariff war.

Why should consumers spend more when the prices of cars and other durable goods that last more than three years, and are mostly either manufactured overseas or the parts are imported, will be hit by the tariffs? And don’t forget Trump wants to dock every country in the world that exports to us with at least a 10 percent tariff rate

This is before the appeal by the Trump administration of the Foreign Trade Court ruling that all reciprocal tariffs must be approved by congress is decided! How is anyone to know what the final tariffs will be, in that case?

There is more to come this week with wholesale inflation (Producer Price Index) and the Fed’s favorite, Personal Consumption Expenditure index (PCE), to follow.

So why are the financial markets rallying to new highs as we speak? It is blind faith, in my opinion, that TACO Trump will chicken out again on the higher import taxes just announced on the likes of Japan, the EU, and even Brazil where we already have a trade surplus from exporting more to Brazil more than we import.

Is it that Trump loves the drama and can’t resist firing broadsides at what he doesn’t like? Or, more likely he desperately needs to collect import taxes to bring down the huge national debt brought on with the tax cuts, but without causing more inflation, something he promised to bring down on ‘Day One’.

How can he keep his promise to lower inflation while he keeps hounding the Fed to lower interest rates sooner (that would boost inflation)? He can’t, in a word, because of his need to cut taxes. So he is raising taxes on everyone else dependent on imports.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen 

Consumers Aren't Buying It

 Popular Economics Weekly

Photo: Emma Da Silva/Getty Images

MarketWatch

“Total U.S. consumer credit growth slowed to a $5.1 billion gain in May, down from a $16.9 billion rise in the prior month, the Federal Reserve said Tuesday.

That translates to a 1.2% annual rate in May, down from a 4% rise in the prior month.” Greg Robb, MarketWatch

President Trump waited for stocks to rally before announcing his latest tariff broadsides on world markets, such as the 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imports. But the result is consumers are shopping less and less. So Trump shouldn’t be paying attention just to the financial markets if he wants to know what might happen over the rest of his term.

Retail sales fell 0.9% in May, the biggest drop in two years. Car sales spiked earlier this year as consumers sought to avoid higher prices from planned tariffs. But sales have slowed sharply since April, said MarketWatch.

The labor market is also slowing. Initial unemployment claims, an early indicator of its direction, have been increasing. The number of people receiving unemployment benefits increased 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.965 million during the week ending June 28, the highest level since November 2021.

Consumer spending drives most economic growth (70%), so if they falter economic growth will slow. And stagnant growth is the component of a possible stag-flation that will result, just as it did in the 1970s with the oil shortages.

We now must wait for the other shoe to drop, which is the effect of the tariff taxes on inflation, which will surely increase later this year, given the supply shortages to follow.

Everyone now knows that TACO Trump is using the shock and awe tactics of so-called reciprocal tariffs, which are blatantly illegal per the Foreign Trade Court ruling now on appeal, to get more concessions from trading partners.

Trump’s problem is that neither consumers nor businesses like uncertainty, yet this is the only way Trump has ever known how to negotiate. His long history of lawsuits and bankruptcies have been the result. And once again he leaves it to the courts to sort out the messes he is now creating for all Americans.

Will it be worth it to those that elected Trump, and will be the most affected by their incompetence?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Where Was FEMA?

 Financial FAQs

“On July 4, the day Trump signed the bill, flash floods devastated central Texas, leaving more than 100 people dead and about 160 still missing. Local officials immediately blamed cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS) for the disaster, but reviews showed that NWS meteorologists had predicted the storm accurately and had sent out three increasingly urgent warnings at 1:14 a.m., 4:03 a.m., and 6:06 a.m.” Heather Cox Richardson, Letters from an American

CNN

The Texas flash flood caught authorities flat-footed, but not the National Weather Service. It is GW Bush’s Katrina Hurricane response fiasco all over again.

I am re-posting excerpts from Historian Heather Cox Richardson’s Substack blog of what really happened in the Guadalupe River, Texas flash flood disaster. It is the most recent example of the cost in lives of the DOGE cost cutting frenzy and Trump administration’s mismanagement, that is also costing lives. This is apparently what we can expect from Trump and the incompetents he has picked to run our government over the next 3.5 years.

“But four hours passed before the police department in the City of Kerrville issued a warning. It wasn’t until 7:32 that the city urged people along the Guadalupe River to move to higher ground immediately. The missing link between the NWS and public safety personnel appears to have been the weather service employee in charge of coordinating between them. He took an unplanned early retirement under pressure from the “Department of Government Efficiency” and has not been replaced.

Then, as Gabe Cohen and Michael Williams of CNN reported, search and rescue teams from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) could not respond to the disaster because Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose department is in charge of FEMA, had recently tried to cut spending by requiring her personal sign-off on any expenditure over $100,000. That order meant FEMA couldn’t put crews in place ahead of the storm, or respond immediately. Noem didn’t sign off on the deployment of FEMA teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding started.

Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, told Cohen and Williams that Noem did not authorize FEMA deployment because DHS used other search and rescue teams. “FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,” McLaughlin told CNN in a statement. “The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades.”

“DHS is rooting out waste, fraud, abuse, and is reprioritizing appropriated dollars. Secretary Noem is delivering accountability to the U.S. taxpayer, which Washington bureaucrats have ignored for decades at the expense of American citizens,” McLaughlin said. Noem has called for the elimination of FEMA.

Meanwhile, FEMA’s acting director, David Richardson, has been nowhere to be found, making no public appearances, statements, or postings on social media since the disaster, and not visiting the site. Former FEMA officials told Thomas Frank of Politico that Richardson’s absence suggests Noem is controlling the FEMA response. Trump appointed Richardson after his team fired his first appointee, Cameron Hamilton, for telling Congress he did not think FEMA should be scrapped.

The day after he took office in May, Richardson, who has no experience with emergency management, told staff: “Don’t get in my way…because I will run right over you. I will achieve the president’s intent…. I, and I alone in FEMA, speak for FEMA,” he said.

Even as rescuers were still at work today in Texas, DHS cancelled a $3 million grant that had been awarded in New York to make sure the NWS can communicate effectively with local officials.”

I maintain it’s what we can look forward to when our government is run by a convicted felon who only trusts those most loyal to him rather than our constitution.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twittter.com/HarlanGreen

No Art of the Trade Deal

 Financial FAQs

“The point is that Trump doesn’t feel bound by trade deals America has made in the past. Why should anyone expect him to honor any new deals he makes, or claims to make, now?

Huffington Post

“Obviously this behavior isn’t unique to tariffs. Many domestic institutions, from law firms to universities, have discovered that attempting to appease Trump buys you at best a few weeks’ respite before he comes back for more.” Paul Krugman

Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman won his Nobel Prize for his research in International Trade, so his remarks on Donald Trump’s behavior in negotiating trade deals is a good way to understand what Donald Trump has done his whole life—bullied people and institutions—because that’s all he knows how to do.

And Krugman fears it will mean Trump will continue his tariff wars, regardless of the outcomes. This certainly means some level of stagflation; higher inflation with slower economic growth, according to most economists and even Wall Streeters. Maybe not on the level of the 1970s stagflation induced by the OPEC Arab Oil Embargo.

It’s Trump’s paranoid personality if you can call it that. It’s the reason he is the con man who has lied and obfuscated his whole life and could only negotiate with lawsuits. He doesn’t really know how to negotiate so that both parties win, and therefore it is a stable relationship between parties. He only wants to overpower a perceived enemy, much like Putin or Xi, real dictators who torture and kill and their own people to maintain power.

I have written about Trump’s poor negotiating skills in past Huffington Post articles and elsewhere. Author Tony Schwarz was the first to seriously write about Trump in Trump: The Art of the Deal, his biography that created the myth that Trump was a skilled wheeler-dealer.

But it wasn’t real, Schwartz said later to New Yorker Magazine’s Jane Mayer in a famous 2016 interview.

“I put lipstick on a pig,” he said. “I feel a deep sense of remorse that I contributed to presenting Trump in a way that brought him wider attention and made him more appealing than he is.” He went on, “I genuinely believe that if Trump wins and gets the nuclear codes there is an excellent possibility it will lead to the end of civilization.”

The just announced reciprocal tariffs on Japan and Korea area a good example, says Krugman. President Trump sent out tariff letters to U.S. trading partners on Monday as he had promised, starting with Japan and South Korea before targeting Malaysia, Indonesia and other countries.

He has labeled them “reciprocal” tariffs because of his perceived unfairness of their tariff policies, but Japan and South Korea charge little or no tariffs on U.S. imports because of long standing agreements, says Krugman, so have little to negotiate.

“How were the South Koreans supposed to end unfair trade practices that exist only in Trump’s imagination?” says Krugman?

Then why is Trump proposing tariffs on them anyway?

“The only possible out here would be a series of fake deals, in which countries pretend to have offered significant concessions and Trump claims to have won big victories. Some people still think that will happen — the new tariffs aren’t supposed to take effect until Aug. 1. But the tone of those letters and Trump’s clear obsession with tariffs make me doubt that he’ll call the tariffs off, in part because of my last observation: Attempts to mollify Trump always end up emboldening him to demand more.”

Then why does Trump do it and cause what will be more huge financial market dips with the loss of more $trillions in equities, many trade disruptions, and alienation of our allies?

Being ‘reciprocal’ has nothing to do with it. Trump will charge at least a 10 percent tariff on the imports from all countries because he needs the import taxes to pay down the huge budget deficit that’s been generated by his Big Beautiful Bill that Congress has just passed.

Therefore his real objective, rather than fairness, is to extract as many concessions as possible from every other country in the world that is dependent on imports to the U.S, regardless of the economic consequences.

Isn’t that what he really wants, to pay for more tax cuts for Trump and the Oligarchs, which will mean the wholesale disruption of world trade, regardless of the possible destruction of our own economy burdened with an unsustainable national debt?

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twittter.com/HarlanGreen

Trump's Terrible Tax Bill

 Popular Economics Weekly

The Guardian

President Trump and Republicans terrible tax bill signed on July 4 will impoverish more Americans, make us sicker, with fewer protections from natural disasters and foreign threats.

The bill raises the debt ceiling by $3-4 trillion, coming at a time when U.S. national debt exceeds $36 trillion. And at least 12 million more people will lose health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s tally of the bill.

The Trump administration is attempting in every way possible to make Americans sicker with the $1 billion cut to health programs in Trump’s terrible tax bill by firing the health experts as well as the cutting their research funding. To heap even more misery on those in most need of its services, he appointed Robert Kennedy, Jr., who made his name as a vaccine-denier, to run the Department of Health and Human Services.

Trump is doing the same damage to old-age and pension benefits by slashing the workforce and budget of social security, which will make the already underfunded social security system less secure for our retired and senior citizens.

Trump’s terrible tax bill will result in American workers becoming less productive because they will be less healthy, while cutbacks to President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act will remove environmental safeguards that protect Americans from the increasing frequency of hurricanes and wildfires.

The latest example is the Kerr County, Texas Christian girl’s camp weather disaster that may have swept away more than 47 girls and their families from a sudden flash flood with little advance warning by the U.S. Weather Service, which is also being downsized with firings and budget cuts and closing of local Weather Service offices.

And Trump is attempting to pay for his terrible tax bill with an illegal tariff war without congressional consent that will make products more expensive and supplies difficult to locate, which in turn will slow economic growth while alienating our allies that have helped to keep America safer.

We will need all the foreign help we can get because Republicans proved with the 9/11 Twin Towers attack that they are not good at protecting Americans from foreign attackers.

In fact, the welfare of most Americans has never been a serious concern for Republicans, which is why Republican-run red states are the poorest states in the union that are most dependent on blue state financial aid.

Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell when asked about his thoughts on the program cuts in Trump’s terrible tax bill has said “They will get used to it.” And Iowa Senator Joni Earnst at a contentious town hall meeting defending the cuts in Medicaid and SNAP programs said, “We are all going to die.”

In acting like the convicted felon he is, Trump is disregarding laws and the constitution in a single-minded drive to make himself and his Oligarchs wealthier and working Americans poorer.

The passing of Trump’s terrible tax bill means Republicans care little for others and have picked a leader who only cares for himself.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

A Better Jobs Report?

 Popular Economics Weekly

“Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 147,000 in June, and the unemployment rate changed little at 4.1 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in state government and health care. Federal government continued to lose jobs.” BLS.GOV

FREDpayrolls

We have one more month of employment data to give us an idea where the U.S. economy is headed during the Trump administration. There were 74,000 private payroll jobs and 73,000 state and local government jobs added, and more federal government job losses.

The results of the June unemployment report were strong enough to perhaps discourage any Fed rate cuts until the fall. Trump is outraged at the Fed’s intransigence because he hopes cutting interest rates will boost growth in combination with his big ugly bill that takes attention away from the huge boost in tariffs he requires to help pay for it that will slow growth and raise inflation—i.e., equals stagflation.

An average 130,000 private payroll jobs per month were created in Trump’s first six months (last six bars in above graph). Whereas President Biden created 15.2 million jobs during his four years, or 327,000 jobs per month and GDP growth averaged 3.2 percent over his four-year term.

Democrats have always been better with the budget math, since President Biden focused on recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic with his New Deal legislation while Republicans have been obsessed with cutting back the stimulus programs to pay for the tax cuts for their wealthiest supporters.

Jobs were created in state and local jobs while the federal government lost jobs from the DOGE efficiency drive. So, the question is can state and local governments take up the hiring slack from the shrinking of federal payrolls?

Republicans are about to pass the ugliest federal budget in history that that is projected to add at least $3 trillion to the annual budget deficit and create $38 trillion to total federal debt. Medicaid is the biggest loser with the Congressional Budget Office predicting that some 11 million could lose their Medicaid coverage because of state cut backs on payment subsidies and various new regulation requirements.

It is extremely bad economics to use a worldwide tariff war to attempt to pay for huge budget deficits in the name of more tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthiest. High tariffs not only disrupt supply chains, as happened during the COVID-19 pandemic because countries attempt to evade the tariffs, but it means alienating friends by treating them as enemies and walling off America from the rest of the world.

That last happened in 1930 and led to the Great Depression. No single country can be self-sufficient in our modern, globalized world. Strength comes with alliances, weakness with alienation and isolation that benefits the few at the expense of the many.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Too Many Job Openings?

 Financial FAQs

The number of job openings was little changed at 7.8 million in May, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the month, both hires and total separations were little changed at 5.5 million and 5.2 million, respectively. Within separations, quits (3.3 million) and layoffs and discharges (1.6 million) changed little.” BLS.GOV

Calculated Risk

The Labor Department’s monthly JOLTS report can be confusing. When the BLS uses the term “little changed”, they mean changes that barely move the needle of the approximately 5 million jobs created and lost each month in the U.S. economy.

But there were still 7.8 million vacant jobs in May seeking workers, according to the Labor Department’s JOLTS report, whereas ADP, a U.S. private payrolls data collector, just reported companies eliminated 33,000 jobs last month, marking the first decline since March 2023.

We are now seeing a weakening in the jobs market that consumers are beginning to worry about in the various consumer confidence surveys and are already cutting back on their spending that drives most (70%) of economic growth.

The above graph shows job openings (black line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS. The difference between hirings and separations approximates the monthly number of jobs created.

How do we square the conflicting payroll data with the official U.S, unemployment report that follows end of the month? Private employers reduced jobs in June for the first time in more than two years, as U.S. trade wars created a “hesitancy to hire and a reluctance to replace departing workers,” said ADP chief economist Dr. Nela Richardson.

The service industries that fill the leisure activity, dining, professional services and transportation sectors lost 66,000 jobs, while the goods producers, such as construction and manufacturing gained 32,000 jobs.

That shouldn’t be a surprise, because large parts of the service industries rely on lower paid immigrants, many of them undocumented, and suddenly many are no longer to be found. The Department of Homeland Security may have rounded up some 100,000 to date but want to deport 3 million a year.

This will devastate the U.S. economy, because the service industries employ most (80 percent) of American workers. Why are Republicans ignoring that fact in the big beautiful (or ugly) bill that was sent back to the House to finalize?

Instead of being employed and supporting the American economy, the undocumented (mostly from the other Americas) will be incarcerated in concentration camps while being processed for deportation, much like the Nazis did in World War Two.

It’s not surprising since it’s Donald Trump’s Republican Party now that includes many Neo-Nazis (remember the Charlottesville torch carriers) among his MAGA supporters.

And companies that depend on imports must reckon with whatever the final tariffs rates will be. Trump has only announced one agreement with the UK to date, and a tentative agreement with Vietnam. The tariffs on Vietnamese imports with be raised to 20 percent, which includes products that have been rerouted from China to avoid Chinese tariffs. So the Vietnamese tariff hike may have an outsize effect.

Trump can continue to postpone the inevitable by delaying the tariff hikes for as long as possible with his TACO negotiating style (Trump Always Chickens Out). But Americans are not so foolish and will restrain their spending until we know who will ultimately pay for the higher tariffs.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twittter.com/HarlanGreen

Anxious Consumers Shop Less

 Popular Economics Weekly

“Disposable personal income (DPI)—personal income less personal current taxes—decreased $125.0 billion (0.6 percent) and personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $29.3 billion (0.1 percent).”

BEA.GOV

We are seeing one of the classic signs of a looming recession—consumers are spending less and saving more, and they power 70 percent of economic activity.

The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) for May from the Bureau of Economic Activity (BEA) showed the personal savings rate has risen to 4.8 percent (black line in graph), while personal consumption expenditures decreased -0.1%, Personal savings had been increasing since early 2025. No surprise, since that is when Trump’s tariff plans were first announced.

Why are they spending less? One of the reasons cited by the consumer sentiment surveys is too much future uncertainty. Not so surprising with inflation worries still high, and the on again, off again tariff announcements that probably mean even higher prices.

The PEW Centers most recent survey said the public again sees inflation as one of the top problems facing the nation, with 62 percent saying inflation is a very big problem for the country – only slightly down from the 65 percent who said this last year (2024).

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index® deteriorated by 5.4 points in June, falling to 93.0 (1985=100) from 98.4 in May. “Consumer confidence weakened in June, erasing almost half of May’s sharp gains,” said Stephanie Guichard, Senior Economist, Global Indicators at The Conference Board. “The decline was broad-based across components, with consumers’ assessments of the present situation and their expectations for the future both contributing to the deterioration.”

The University of Michigan’s Consumer sentiment survey surged 16% from May in its first increase in six months but remains well below the post-election bounce seen in December 2024 when last year’s economic growth was 3 percent, the highest in the developed world, and jobs were still plentiful.

“Despite June’s gains, however, sentiment remains about 18% below December 2024, right after the election; consumer views are still broadly consistent with an economic slowdown and an increase in inflation to come,” said Survey Director Joanne Hsu.

From the same month one year ago, the PCE price index for May increased 2.3 percent. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 2.7 percent from one year ago. It’s at least a sign of stagflation if the spending slowdown continues, since the PCE report also shows signs of higher inflation that the Fed is worried about.

No wonder consumers are more worried. Bloomberg research reveals AI could replace 53 percent of the white-collar market research analyst tasks and 67 percent of sales representative tasks, while managerial roles face only 9 to 21% automation risk.

The World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs Report reveals that 41 percent of employers worldwide intend to reduce their workforce in the next five years due to AI automation. Industries like technology, finance, and consulting are highlighted as particularly vulnerable.

It really looks like Republicans are trying as hard as possible to start a recession. They are shrinking the workforce by deporting undocumented immigrants who work with their hands and thus would be needed to fill some of the 400,000 vacant manufacturing jobs.

And passing Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill will create an unsustainable debt load, keeping interest rates high.

So though Biden suffered through higher inflation, it was because of the $trillions in New Deal legislation that caused 3.2 percent GDP growth during his term. The Trump administration has managed just -0.5 GDP growth in Trump's first quarter as President.

This is what happens when Republican tax cuts transfer even more wealth to the Oligarchs from middle and working class Americans.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

First Quarter Growth Revised Lower

 Financial FAQs

“Real gross domestic product (GDP) decreased at an annual rate of -0.5 percent in the first quarter of 2025 (January, February, and March), according to the third estimate released by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the fourth quarter of 2024, real GDP increased 2.4 percent.” BEA.GOV

We won’t know yet if we can stay out of a recession because first quarter GDP was revised downward in its final (third) estimate, but Americans have been stocking up on cheaper imports before the tariffs kick in, just in case.

Real GDP was revised down 0.3 percentage point from the second estimate (-0.2%), primarily because of downward revisions to consumer spending and exports. This was before the April 2 tariffs and retaliatory tariffs hit consumers.

But the final (third) revision of Q1 GDP showed inflation already rising because of the rush to buy before April 2. The price index for gross domestic purchases increased 3.4 percent in the first quarter, a revised +0.1 percentage point from the previous estimate. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index increased 3.7 percent, and the PCE price index excluding food and energy increased 3.5 percent, both +0.1 percentage point higher than previously estimated.

So, what are consumers and businesses to do while waiting for the final outcome of the tariff wars? (If there will be a grand finale, that is.) Trump is using the tariffs to not only pay for the huge deficit that his Big Beautiful Tax bill will create, but as a way to bully other countries to do all manner of things, like get NATO to up its military spending, and China to import more U.S. exports.

The general consensus is that tariffs will ultimately end up being about 10 percent for most countries (30 percent for Chinese imports), up from 4 percent in recent history. The financial markets are rallying again because of Trump’s TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) negotiating techniques—suddenly raising retaliatory tariffs, then cancelling them. It can’t prevent higher prices, since so much of what we consume is imported.

Things might look brighter for a while, like in the second quarter just coming to a close in June. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate of second quarter growth is still holding at 3.4 percent because of continued investment in AI and other high-tech innovations in its most recent Nowcast. But we won’t see the first estimate of second quarter GDP growth until July 30.

“The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the second quarter of 2025 is 3.4 percent on June 18, down from 3.5 percent on June 17. After this morning’s housing starts report from the US Census Bureau, the nowcast of second-quarter real residential fixed investment growth decreased from -2.8 percent to -4.4 percent.

Higher fixed investment is good for growth, of course, yet we are also seeing increases in weekly initial jobless claims that come close to Great Recession and COVID-19 pandemic numbers. The number of jobless workers collecting longer term unemployment benefits rose by 37,000 to 1.97 million, marking the highest level since November 2021.

That’s because much of the high-tech and AI investment will be replacing White-collar workers. We now must wait until July 30 before Q2 growth numbers come out from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s a long time to wait these days, since so much can happen.

Stocks and bonds are rallying because corporate profits are higher, as well as the hope that TACO Trump won’t level any more retaliatory tariffs. The Foreign Trade Court has said the retaliatory tariffs aren’t legal. So maybe that’s what the markets are betting on—no more tariff increases. Most analysts are predicting the new 10 percent tariff level will shave approximately 1.5 percent from GDP growth this year, however.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twittter.com/HarlanGreen

Fed Rate Cuts Coming Soon?

 The Mortgage Corner

“Existing-home sales rose in May, according to the National Association of REALTORS®. Sales elevated in the Northeast, Midwest and South, but retreated in the West. Year-over-year, sales progressed in the Northeast and Midwest but contracted in the South and West.” NAR

CalculatedRisk

President Trump is now putting on a full court press to convince the Fed Governors to cut interest rates. There are some good reasons to lower interest rates, including the fact that home sales are at levels that last prevailed during the 2008-09 Great Recession (see above graph).

But his “Big Beautiful Bill” will add an additional $3 trillion to the federal debt that means almost $1 billion in annual interest payments. Trump has said he wants rates to be cut as much as one point (-1.0%) from the current 4.25% Fed Funds overnight rate that adjusts the Prime Rate controlling credit card and auto loan payments.

Any rate cuts would give a huge boost to financial markets as well that have been held back by the high borrowing costs for both consumers and businesses.

Fed President Powell speaks to congress this week and Trump wants congressional Republicans to grill him on why he hasn’t lowered interest rates further.

This is because Powell said at his recent press conference, “For the time being, we are well-positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.”

Two of the Fed Governors appointed by President Trump are already leaning in his direction. Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman said after the bank stood pat last week that they would be open to a rate cut at the July 29-30 meeting, according to MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash.

And we mustn’t forget housing sales have been flat since January 2023 when the Fed began to raise their short-term rates. That’s why the National Association of Realtors have also been lobbying for lower interest rates.

"The relatively subdued sales are largely due to persistently high mortgage rates. Lower interest rates will attract more buyers and sellers to the housing market," said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. "Increasing participation in the housing market will increase the mobility of the workforce and drive economic growth. If mortgage rates decrease in the second half of this year, expect home sales across the country to increase due to strong income growth, healthy inventory, and a record-high number of jobs."

There’s also another reason why interest rates may fall further in July; fears that tariff wars may induce a recession. The Federal Reserve’s release of its minutes from the last FOMC meeting didn’t have much to say about the continuing tariff wars, because nothing has yet been negotiated—just some retaliatory pauses and a written understanding with the UK.

That puts the Fed in a very difficult position. We now know why President Trump has attempted to disguise the fact that it is an import tax. The Court of International Trade has ruled that Trump’s retaliatory tariffs (i.e., import taxes) are illegal.

Hence Chairman Powell’s concern that a recession may be on the horizon was mentioned in last week’s FOMC minutes. “The staff viewed the possibility that the economy would enter a recession to be almost as likely as the baseline forecast.”

We know from past history (i.e., Trump’s first term) that higher tariffs cause higher inflation, which Trump denies will happen again (because it was a campaign promise), and Powell, et.al., have worked hard to get inflation down to its current level.

We also now have reports that imports have declined almost 40 percent in the west coast, which handle most Chinese supplies. Long Beach and Los Angeles posted month-over-month drops of 31.6 percent and 29.9%, while Tacoma and Seattle fell over 40%.

So, there is a good case to be made that interest rates should be coming down, for both good and bad reasons. It does look like Republicans’ “Big Beautiful Bill” will pass, regardless of the consequences. And who doesn’t like lower interest rates?

But Republicans are playing with fire by endangering the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. in wanting to finance it with another $3 trillion in debt.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

U.S. Already in Recession?

 Financial FAQs

The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the US ticked down by 0.1% in May 2025 to 99.0 (2016=100), after declining by 1.4% in April (revised downward from –1.0% originally reported). The LEI has fallen by 2.7% in the six-month period ending May 2025, a much faster rate of decline than the 1.4% contraction over the previous six months.

ConferenceBoard

Are we already in a recession? The Fed doesn’t think so, but the Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators conjectures we will be in a recession soon, if not already. The LEI is a tricky read because it looks at indicators spanning longer periods, hence its name.

The Conference Board’s index of Leading Economic Indicators is now signaling that a recession might have begun in May 2025, though Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the Fed Governors don’t think so. Powell said after last Wednesday’s FOMC meeting that interest rates will stay on hold for now.

“The economy is in solid shape, so the labor market is not crying out for a rate cut,” said Powell. (Therefore, the Fed has time to “learn” more about the economy.)

However, Justyna Zabinska-La Monica, Senior Manager, Business Cycle Indicators, at The Conference Board, said “With the substantial negatively revised drop in April and the further downtick in May, the six-month growth rate of the Index has become more negative, triggering the recession signal,”

The Conference Board creates several surveys, including the Consumer Confidence Index, so it puts the most weight on consumer expectations for business conditions, which has been dropping sharply in its surveys.

And the ISM’s New Order Index as well as private housing building permits have continued to decline as well, thanks to the Fed’s intransigence on reducing interest rates further.

So the LEI is hedging its bets just as the Fed is doing by taking a longer wait and see. “The Conference Board does not anticipate recession, but we do expect a significant slowdown in economic growth in 2025 compared to 2024, with real GDP growing at 1.6% this year and persistent tariff effects potentially leading to further deceleration in 2026.”

Federal Reserve President Chris Waller, one of the Fed Governors, is a dissenter: “I don’t think [the inflation impact of Trump’s tariffs] is going to be that big,” Waller said in an interview on CNBC. “I think we have room to bring [rates] down in July (the next FOMC meeting)”

Almost everyone in congress and President Trump also want lower rates because the new fiscal budget’s annual interest expense could be close to $1 trillion annually on approximately $38 trillion in debt.

This is unsustainable, so everyone is waiting to see if the Republican congress succeeds in driving the U.S. economy over the cliff with their new fiscal budget. Then what good will any amount of import taxes (tariffs) do to fill the debt void?

It’s becoming evident that Republicans will do anything to get their tax cuts, and Democrats don’t seem to be shouting loud enough to win at least two Republican House members to their side that don’t want to bankrupt the U. S. economy.

That’s all they require to block the looming budget disaster. This is while it looks like Trump’s tariffs will ultimately equal those in 1930. And we know the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariffs that raised prices on imports was one of the reasons for the Great Depression.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Tariffs Trump Consumer Spending

 Financial FAQs

“Advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for May 2025, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $715.4 billion, down 0.9 percent (±0.5 percent) from the previous month, and up 3.3 percent (±0.5 percent) from May 2024.” U.S. Census Bureau

FREDretailsales

Retail sales have declined in four out of five months since January, a sign that consumers don’t like trade wars; i.e., not knowing what will happen to prices and whether shelves will soon be empty if  President Trump can’t finalize any of the trade deals that he says are almost done.

There’s even more that affects consumer spending and economic growth—the new federal budget still in negotiation and immigration crackdown that will become evident in coming months.

Consumers and businesses are complaining about the uncertainties, which is why President Trump keeps postponing the deadlines while pushing for better “deals”. He can keep promising, though even the UK tariff tax hasn’t been finalized.

The Senate could shave as much as $1 trillion from Medicaid spending in the Senate version of the bill not yet out of committees, according to reports.

And it will increase the federal debt by $2.8 trillion, which will drive up interest rates because bond investors will demand higher returns for the added risk of default. Higher interest rates will then slow growth, while rising import prices from snarled supply chains caught up in the tariff war will cause higher inflation, which is the other half of the stagnation + inflation (stagflation) equation that will result.

Motor vehicles and parts as well as construction sales declined in the retail sales report, as did healthcare and gardening supply sales. Consumers have also dined out less over the past two months, another sign that consumers are becoming more cautious in their spending habits.

All the Trump administration seems to be able to do at present is round up undocumented immigrants, which should cause even more serious damage to economic growth. Immigrants also like to shop, and now there are fewer of them working or shopping due to the growing arrests of undocumented immigrants.

According to estimates on its website from the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) and other groups, as many as 8.3 million undocumented immigrants work in the US economy, or 5.2 percent of the workforce. They work in construction (1.5 million), restaurants (1 million), agriculture and farms (320,000), landscaping (300,000), and food processing and manufacturing (200,000), among other occupations.

That’s a lot of undocumented immigrants in the workforce, and the Trump administration wants to deport one million of them per year. As the numbers of working immigrants decline so will the amounts they produce, which also effects the family members who are American citizens.

And guess where many of them work—in red states with lots of agriculture for which immigrants are needed. That, and the draconian cuts to the health services will hurt MAGA-dominated red states the most that have fewer public services.

This is Economics 101, folks. Without more workers our economy can’t grow. And without paying for our debts, interest rates will continue to rise. And with tariffs at historically high levels, as high as they were in 1930, the cost of almost everything will rise. It’s not bringing down inflation on ‘Day 1’ or any other day of this administration.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Calkfornia Can't Be Bullied

 Popular Economics Weekly

Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that California has officially overtaken Japan to become the world’s fourth-largest economy, according to newly released data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). April, 2025

LATimes

The Trump administration’s efforts to bully California in the past week by sending in contingents of the California Coast Guard and active-duty Marines to ‘guard’ its ICE agents that are bent on rounding up as many undocumented workers in California as possible, is almost comical.

Would they try the same with Japan or Germany, who have economies that are basically the same size? Of course not, though Trump wants to pick on smaller Canada, and maybe Denmark’s Greenland.

Of the 850,000 farmworkers in California that are providing close to one-quarter of the agricultural produce of America, some 400,000 are seasonal workers (i.e., with permits) or undocumented, which is why President Trump has told ICE workers to stop rounding them up, for fear Americans will no longer have enough fresh (or canned) produce to eat.

It’s a sign of the Trump administration’s tremendous ignorance that their efforts to deport as many of the 11 million undocumented U.S. workers is looking worse than ridiculous, it is enraging the populous of those cities that depend on immigrants to work in the service and hospitality industries, as well as feed them.

If Trump also thinks he can humble California by attacking the University of California system (UC) as he is doing to Harvard, he is also mistaken.

The system's ten campuses presently have a combined student body of 299,407 students, 26,100 faculty members, 192,400 staff members, over 2.5 million living alumni, and $41.6 billion in annual operating revenues.

And as an alumnus, I can attest it teaches or promotes no particular ideology or political view, just the scientific and social science truths that are verified and tested empirically, not by rumor or conspiracy theories.

Trump and the Republican Party have succeeded in bullying the smaller red states they have dominated since the 1970s, making them the poorest states in income (many have no minimum wage), health care, social services and education.

Republican led red states are mostly dependent on the excess tax revenues passed on to them from blue states.

“In 2023, the federal government collected around $4.67 trillion from states and their residents through taxes on individuals and businesses and redistributed about $4.56 trillion back to states and residents through programs like Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, food stamps, and education grants, says USA Facts.

Virginia alone depended on $79 billion in transfer payments in 2023 to balance its budget from states like California and New York, who contributed $78B and $89B in 2023 to the federal kitty.

So why have Republicans gone to all this trouble that will do very little harm to the likes of UC and California’s economy? Their red states can’t do without the income coming from blue states.

Oh, their leaders want more tax cuts, which will continue to increase federal debt. Americans will find out soon enough that’s not how to stay in business.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Republicans Have Never Paid Their Bills

 Financial FAQs

“The new law will reduce federal revenues by significant amounts, even after allowing for the impact on economic growth. It will make the distribution of after-tax income more unequal. If it is not financed with concurrent spending cuts or other tax increases, TCJA (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) will raise federal debt and impose burdens on future generations. If it is financed with spending cuts or other tax increases, TCJA will, under the most plausible scenarios, end up making most households worse off than if it had not been enacted.” Brookings

President Trump is justifying his trade war that could wreck the U.S. and maybe world economies because he wants to renew his 2018 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that could raise the federal debt $2.8 trillion over the next 10 years.

If Republicans would ever pay their bills, rather than continue to lobby for tax cuts, we wouldn’t be in this situation. But they haven’t since Ronald Reagan and now are led by a complete phony who sues those that expose his lies making complete fools of those who support him.

Why are we in a huge financial mess today with a record federal budget deficit and falling value of the dollar President Trump is using to justify an illegal tariff war that is tearing apart the world’s financial order and alienating our closest allies?

Trump’s Republicans are twisting themselves into pretzels to justify the tariff wars Trump is waging on the whole world—all 180 countries—that could lead to product shortages last experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Yet rather than destroy the U.S. and other world economies with unjustified DOGE job cuts and tariffs, if Trump Republicans were serious about reducing the federal debt, they should raise taxes on those that have benefited most from decades of tax cuts enacted by Republican administrations

It doesn’t have to be this way. The Clinton/Gore government downsizing of the 1990s created four years of budget surpluses, because they negotiated with congress to make the cuts that were in congressionally mandated programs.

“Unlike the current effort, the cutting didn’t start until they had gone through a six-month study process and developed a blueprint of how to best reinvent the federal government,” said a recent Newsweek article on the subject. “Government agencies were brought into the process to determine the best ways that efficiencies could be realized. In fact, the effort was led by some 250 federal employees that remained on their agency payrolls.”

The federal workforce was reduced by 440,000 employees between 1993 and 2000, or about 17 percent of the total. The cuts made the government the smallest it had been since the Eisenhower administration, according to the Newsweek report.

FREDdebtpercentageGDP

The St, Louis Fed (FRED) graph of federal debt as a percentage of GDP shows precisely when Republicans began to drastically cut taxes in 1980 under President Reagan—from a 75 percent maximum personal tax rate to below 40 percent, whereas the 90 percent corporate tax rate and 92 percent maximum personal tax rate of the Eisenhower era paid for the “new hires, new equipment, and product research which are deductible from taxable earnings.”

In other words, the higher tax rates made corporations use their profits to finance U.S. growth. Whereas today the tax cuts have mostly financed corporate stock buybacks.

How times have changed! President Eisenhower asked wouldn’t it be better to spend a majority of earnings on expanding the U.S. economy rather than to horde it?

Not any more, because Republicans don’t want to pay their bills rather than provide social services and environmental protection that would benefit all Americans. That’s their history since President Reagan declared that “government was the problem” and immediately fired the federal air traffic controllers who were striking for higher pay and better working conditions.

Will Americans realize and restore Republicans’ theft from American taxpayers via the tax cuts since 1980? It’s estimated some $1 trillion in wealth has been transferred from American workers to the owners of wealth since then that is causing the record income inequality we have today.

Make no mistake, if enough Americans don’t realize what fools they’ve been to support a President who says we’ve just won World War I, and appointed a Navy Secretary who held a ceremony honoring the 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on June 6 instead of December 6, it will result in the wholesale destruction of our democracy and loss of the “good faith and credit” of the U.S. Government.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Immigrants Make a Difference

 Popular Economics Weekly

“Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 139,000 in May, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.2 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment continued to trend up in health care, leisure and hospitality, and social assistance. Federal government continued to lose jobs.” BLS

FREDnonfarmpayrolls

The above FRED graph is the best picture of where the jobs market has been headed over the past two years (May 23-May 25). It’s a slow downward trend that is averaging a monthly gain of 149,000 over the prior 12 months.

But since January 2025 and Donald Trump’s inauguration (last five bars in graph), job growth has averaged just 124,000 per month increases, and Trump’s anti-immigrant policies will continue to harm the job market and economic growth

It's becoming obvious that firms are hiring less because of rising uncertainty caused by the DOGE cuts and Trump’s tariffs. And don’t forget the immigration crackdown that is reducing the number of workers available for those jobs. The Trump administration has trumpeted the ‘removal’ of some 72,000 undocumented immigrants already, and intention to remove more than one million over the next year.

We know what that will do to our workforce. Some 625,000 working adults have dropped out of the adult workforce just in May, which means they stopped even looking for work.

So, it’s difficult to know if the immigration crackdown is causing more to simply stop working as well as the hiring slowdown. We know that immigrants, whether legal or undocumented, have become a major component of our job market with our declining population growth.

According to the Center for Migration Studies, a non-partisan think tank, an estimated 8.3 million unauthorized immigrants contribute to the economy, representing about 5% of all workers. This number has increased since 2019 but is like the 2007 figure. Lawful immigrants make up most of the immigrant workforce at 22.2 million, or 13% of all workers. Many work in construction (1.5 million) and restaurants (1 million), and fewer in Agriculture and farms.

Reducing the number of workers will hurt both our employment picture, as well as future growth, since if the normal one million plus annual influx of immigrants is reduced, it will impact GDP growth as well.

But in wanting so badly to feed red meat to his MAGA followers with the propaganda that immigrants are evil and criminals, employers cannot find the workers they need. There are still more than 7 million job vacancies, according to the Labor Department’s JOLTS report.

This didn’t have to happen, if Trump had allowed the bipartisan immigration bill to pass that Biden had negotiated, which gave a path to citizenship and allowed immigrants to obtain legal work permits.

But the Trump administration isn’t interested in economic growth as much as branding non-European whites as undesirables—even though our Hispanic population, mostly South and Central American, are of white European origin.

It's how autocrats stay in power. President Trump is dividing Americans in artificial ways—whether by economic class, or birth origins—any way he can think up to exacerbate the divisions.

And it will not only shrink the working population, but U.S. economic growth as well.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Is American Exceptionalism Dead?

 AK 6-9-25

American exceptionalism may not be dead yet, but our democratic principles and Constitution are under assault (“U.S. Market Dominance Is On Pause. It Will Roar Back,” Other Voices, May 29). There’s plenty of research on the decline of sustainable economic growth in autocratic regimes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist Daron Acemoglu won a Nobel Prize for his research on the superior growth of “inclusive” (more democratic) versus autocratic (exploitative) governments. American exceptionalism may suffer from more than a “prolonged period of U.S. underperformance” under a president who has demonstrated little regard for our democratic institutions.

Harlan Green

Santa Barbara, Calif.

More Signs of Slow Growth

 Financial FAQs

“The manufacturing economy continues to struggle,” Susan Spence of ISM said. “It will continue to struggle” due to all the trade uncertainty.

“The administration’s tariffs alone have created supply chain disruptions rivaling that of Covid-19,” an executive at an electronics company told ISM.

FREDmanufacturingemployment

The only number in the Institute of Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing survey that rose were prices due to a shortage of commodities—i.e., supply. Every other component of the supply managers’ survey was contracting—such as new orders, production, and employment.

Manufacturing employment had been declining since 1980; from 19,000,000 jobs to 12,765,000 jobs in April per the FRED graph out of a total 159 million jobs.

It’s the first sector of the U.S. economy that is showing stagflation—prices are up while production is stagnating. Hence the above remarks from supply managers and Susan Spence, Chair of the ISM Survey.

The services index of the Institute for Supply Management also contracted for the first time in a year. It fell to 49.9% in May from 51.6% in April, the ISM said Wednesday. Any number below 50% signals contraction.

Economic activity in the services sector contracted in May, the first time since June 2024, say the nation's purchasing and supply executives in the latest Services ISM^® Report On Business^®. The Services PMI^® indicated slight contraction at 49.9 percent, below the 50-percent breakeven point for only the fourth time in 60 months since recovery from the coronavirus pandemic-induced recession began in June 2020.

The Labor Department’s JOLTS report shows that the service sector is still adding jobs. Job openings rose in April for white-collar, retail, healthcare, and entertainment and recreation roles. But job listings fell at hotels and restaurants, whose business has been hurt by a decline in tourism. Some foreign visitors have put off trips to the U.S. because of the trade wars and other White House policies.

Another disheartening jobs report came out today. ADP, a private payroll processor, reported that privately run businesses created just 37,000 new jobs in May — the smallest increase in more than two years — as the most damaging global trade wars since the Great Depression spurred many firms to put a pause on hiring.

The real problem is that employers won’t begin to hire again until the trade wars are resolved, and President Trump says he isn’t letting up on the tariff wars because it will create more manufacturing jobs. But that will take years, and automation has replaced most of the manufacturing jobs (which no longer pay as well) before we see any signs of a manufacturing resurgence.

Economists such as Paul Krugman, who won a Nobel Prize for his pioneering research in foreign trade, remarking on the sudden 50 percent increase in steel tariffs, believes the damage  to the U.S. Economy from such draconian tariff rates (i.e., import taxes) is already done.

So steel tariffs don’t make any policy sense. But then neither does anything else in Trump’s trade war — and the nonsensical nature of the whole enterprise is why I don’t think he’ll find an off-ramp. After all, it’s obvious that the increased steel tariff wasn’t a considered policy, it was a temper tantrum after the Court of International Trade ruled against his other tariffs.

Is the contraction of both the service and manufacturing sectors the first sign that the U.S. economy is already in recession? This Friday’s ‘official’ U.S. Labor Department unemployment report will tell us more.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Trump's Big Beautiful Bill?

 Answering Kennedy’s Call

“The House has now passed what must surely be the worst piece of legislation in modern U.S. history. Millions of Americans are about to see crucial government support snatched away. A significant number will die prematurely due to lack of adequate medical care or nutrition. Yet all this suffering won’t come close to offsetting the giant hole in the budget created by huge tax cuts for the rich. Long-term interest rates have already soared as America loses the last vestiges of its former reputation for fiscal responsibility.” Paul Krugman-Substack

 Graph: Last Tech Age

Budget analysts have been saying (almost unanimously) that it will increase our federal debt by as much as $4trillion and raise the federal debt level to as much as 130 percent of GDP, further endangering the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. Government.

In passing their ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ (BBB) by just one vote, Republicans will worsen the income inequality and partisan divide that has picked ordinary Americans’ pocketbooks since the 1980s and President Reagan’s ‘trickle down’ economic policies.

The BBB will essentially renew the Trump administrations first term Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJB), that gave even more tax breaks to the wealthiest—to Trump and his oligarchs.

The U.S. Is already in 106th place of the 149 countries in income inequality as ranked by the CIA’s World Factbook, I said in 2017; with a Gini inequality index that ranks it with developing countries like Peru and Cameroon. Whereas Finland and the Scandinavian countries are at the top of equality rankings; Germany and France are ranked 12th and 20th, respectively. The higher the index, the greater the gap between wealthy and poor citizens of a country.

So how much worse can it get before MAGA followers realize Trump has never meant to fulfill the “Day 1” promises of lower inflation, more good paying jobs, and a Ukraine peace deal?

The nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities gave the most digestible breakdown of the TCJA effects, if it passes the Senate as well:

· Giving the biggest benefits to the wealthy. Households with incomes in the top 5 percent, who have incomes over around $320,000, would receive roughly half of the benefits of extending the expiring tax cuts.

· Ballooning the deficit. Along with the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts enacted under President Bush, the 2017 law has severely eroded our nation’s revenue base. The House budget would compound the damage, adding hundreds of billions of dollars to deficits each year. Extending the 2017 tax cuts would cost $3.6 trillion through 2034.

· Failing to significantly boost economic growth, workers’ earnings, or other benefits for workers. The trickle-down benefits that proponents claimed the 2017 law would produce never materialized, and the law hasn’t come close to paying for itself. Yet the House budget claims that extending the tax cuts would generate trillions in revenue — far more than any independent estimate.

Our ranking of the worst income inequality among developed countries is bound to influence U.S. voters once the Trump’s higher import taxes take hold as well, and stagflation returns.

Even worse is the effect the BBB will have to our credit rating. Will it continue to decline? That is really what Paul Krugman is most worried about. It’s the worst kind of fiscal responsibility. Why such a blatant and foolish attempt to make the rich richer and working Americans poorer? Republicans aren’t even attempting to hide it anymore.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen