No More Jobs?

 Popular Economics Weekly

“Consumer confidence inched up in June as falling oil prices in recent weeks provided some relief to consumer inflation fears,” said Dana M Peterson, Chief Economist, The Conference Board. “Consumer appraisals of current business conditions were slightly more positive compared to last month. However, perceptions of the current labor market softened measurably as the percentage of consumers saying jobs were ‘hard to get’ rose to 22.5%, the highest level since January 2021 (22.8%). Conference Board

 

MarketWatch

The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Survey highlighted what was behind the meager total of 57,000 new jobs in June – the fewest in four months. The job market may not recover from the damage the Trump administration has done to the U.S. economy anytime soon.

Some 755,000 worker dropped out of the labor force in June because “jobs are hard to get,” said the Conference Board’s survey.

What's more, job gains in May and April were revised down to a combined 277,000 from a previous 351,000 - 74,000 fewer than previously reported.

Trump’s Iran War disaster is probably the main reason for the job losses because higher energy prices from the Middle East are elevating inflation and slowing down hiring for years to come. Wall Street is hoping the A.I. revolution will boost labor productivity to such an extent that it will tame inflation, but without creating many new jobs.

The other culprit for fewer new jobs? Federal immigration officials have detained more than 10,000 people in the last five days, reports the NYTimes, a major surge that has stemmed from a push within Immigration and Customs Enforcement to increase arrest rates. Immigrants won in the latest SCOTUS rulings that ICE cannot hold them without due process, which might slow down the roundups because it means a bond hearing.

The shrinking labor force will shrink economic growth as well since fewer workers means less will be produced; unless the A.I. delivers on it promises of higher producivity. And that will take years. But that means fewer workers, anyway. There will be more robots, Claude, ChatGPT, Open AI, etc., etc. and a shrinking workforce that pays less taxes to support public policies, social security, Medicare and public debt don’t forget, which is soaring, of course.

Well, many of the new jobs will be in the lower paying healthcare industry — hospitals, doctor's offices, dentists, nursing homes and so forth — that created 47,000 of the 57,000 new U.S. jobs in June.

The big question will be how to support our public policies that serve all Americans in the future (and preserve jobs), rather than more Republican policies that continue to favor the concentration of wealth via A.I. or whatever, driving U.S. ever closer to insolvency.

Harlan Green © 2026

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Why Make America Weak?

 

Financial FAQs

“This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.” Franklin Delano Rooselvelt

theguardian.com

The Democrat’s election sweep on November 2 is proving that American voters  heeded President Roosevelt’s famous warning at his first inaugural address, that the Democrats' paralysis after the loss to Trump II is over and fear, the greatest enemy of Democracy, can be conquered.

The November 2 elections showed just how illusory were those fears that Donald Trump and Republicans wanted Americans to believe, that the largest, most prosperous country in the world had grown weak. Americans were now in danger and only he and his oligarchs could save US.

In fact, Donald Trump and the Republican Party have been attempting to weaken everything that makes America the oldest constitutional democracy since his first day in office.

He began by slashing of essential government services via Elon Musk’s DOGE computer hackers (such as social security, Medicare, Medicare) that benefit all Americans, the attempt to eliminate the the Department of Education that supports our basic universal K-12 and early childhood educational systems, while picking the most unqualified to run the FBI, Department of Homeland Services, and Health and Human Services so that they are no longer fully functional. 

The brutal roundup of undocumented immigrants, whether they have a criminal record, are decimating the ranks of workers that fill agricultural, manufacturing, and service sector jobs needed to maintain economic growth.

The biggest financial threat to ordinary Americans are the rising prices on basic necessities that most Americans depend on due to tariff rates now at Great Depression levels, impoverishing the majority of Americans that live from paycheck-to-paycheck.

It’s become obvious that the Trump administration’s intent has been to instill as much fear as possible in the most vulnerable Americans that the federal government won’t work for them and only Trump and his oligarchs can same them.

But the recent election and huge protests at the last No Kings rallies are a sign that millions of Americans haven’t been cowed or paralyzed.

In fact, they have said, as did Howard Beale, the News Anchor in the movie Network, “I’m as mad as hell and not going to take this anymore!”

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Trump's Terrible Tax Bill

 Popular Economics Weekly

The Guardian

President Trump and Republicans terrible tax bill signed on July 4 will impoverish more Americans, make us sicker, with fewer protections from natural disasters and foreign threats.

The bill raises the debt ceiling by $3-4 trillion, coming at a time when U.S. national debt exceeds $36 trillion. And at least 12 million more people will lose health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s tally of the bill.

The Trump administration is attempting in every way possible to make Americans sicker with the $1 billion cut to health programs in Trump’s terrible tax bill by firing the health experts as well as the cutting their research funding. To heap even more misery on those in most need of its services, he appointed Robert Kennedy, Jr., who made his name as a vaccine-denier, to run the Department of Health and Human Services.

Trump is doing the same damage to old-age and pension benefits by slashing the workforce and budget of social security, which will make the already underfunded social security system less secure for our retired and senior citizens.

Trump’s terrible tax bill will result in American workers becoming less productive because they will be less healthy, while cutbacks to President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act will remove environmental safeguards that protect Americans from the increasing frequency of hurricanes and wildfires.

The latest example is the Kerr County, Texas Christian girl’s camp weather disaster that may have swept away more than 47 girls and their families from a sudden flash flood with little advance warning by the U.S. Weather Service, which is also being downsized with firings and budget cuts and closing of local Weather Service offices.

And Trump is attempting to pay for his terrible tax bill with an illegal tariff war without congressional consent that will make products more expensive and supplies difficult to locate, which in turn will slow economic growth while alienating our allies that have helped to keep America safer.

We will need all the foreign help we can get because Republicans proved with the 9/11 Twin Towers attack that they are not good at protecting Americans from foreign attackers.

In fact, the welfare of most Americans has never been a serious concern for Republicans, which is why Republican-run red states are the poorest states in the union that are most dependent on blue state financial aid.

Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell when asked about his thoughts on the program cuts in Trump’s terrible tax bill has said “They will get used to it.” And Iowa Senator Joni Earnst at a contentious town hall meeting defending the cuts in Medicaid and SNAP programs said, “We are all going to die.”

In acting like the convicted felon he is, Trump is disregarding laws and the constitution in a single-minded drive to make himself and his Oligarchs wealthier and working Americans poorer.

The passing of Trump’s terrible tax bill means Republicans care little for others and have picked a leader who only cares for himself.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Trump 2.0 vs. First 100 Days

 Popular Economics Weekly

“With President Donald Trump’s second term approaching its 100-day mark, 40% of Americans approve of how he’s handling the job – a decline of 7 percentage points from February,” PEW Research.

PEW

The big mystery is why Donald Trump is repeating the same mistakes he made in his first 100 days in office—chaotic tariff wars, illegal downsizing of congress-mandated agencies, threats of cuts to social security, Medicare and Medicaid services— that have hurt his ratings, as happened in Trump 1.0.

The answer is the continued support of his base; MAGA Republicans vs. that of all Americans, says PEW Research.

Seven-in-ten or more Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of:

• · Trump’s job performance (75%)
• · The administration’s cuts to government (78%)
• · Increased tariffs (70%)
• · Ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the federal government (78%)

Among Trump’s predecessors dating back to Ronald Reagan, the only other leader who did not enjoy majority approval at his 100-day mark was Bill Clinton (49% approval in April 1993), according to PEW.

Why? For starters, Trump’s supporters seem to believe that executive orders can replace laws and tariff negotiations, though such tactics don’t work well in a democracy based on laws enforced by an independent judiciary.

Whose tariff policies that are based on mostly false premises has Trump followed —e.g., calculating trade imbalances solely on goods but not service sector trades? Some blame Peter Navarro, his chief tariff advisor, while Trump has admired President William Mckinley’s use of tariffs in 1890 that enriched Robber Barons in the first Gilded Age.

But Hitler also raised import tariffs in the 1930s to shield and build Germany’s domestic manufacturing base that fueled his war machine, all in the quest for more ‘Lebensraum.’ Trump scares me when he maintains his lie that tariffs don’t cause inflation, while he talks about creating more Lebensraum by wanting to acquire Greenland, the Panama Canal, and even Canada.

There is a darker vein as well, the racial purity efforts (e.g., white supremacy) that was a mainstay of Hitler’s Nazi Party that is reflected in Trump’s attempts to purge all mention of DEI programs in both government and private (e.g., educational) institutions.

I like a Fortune Magazine report from 2017 on candidate Trump’s past negotiating tactics: “The legal actions provide clues to the leadership style the billionaire businessman would bring to bear as commander in chief. He sometimes responds to even small disputes with overwhelming legal force. He doesn’t hesitate to deploy his wealth and legal firepower against adversaries with limited resources, such as homeowners. He sometimes refuses to pay real estate brokers, lawyers and other vendors.”

Trump’s attempts to act like a strong man aren’t panning out, in other words, mainly because autocratic regimes are antithetical to strong economies, which require a citizenry that has the freedom to innovate. It’s the same reason Americans don’t like Putin, China’s Xi, or dictators in general.

Polls show there are still Americans that would rather have an autocrat such as Trump to make decisions for them. But the price they pay is living in mostly Republican-controlled red states where living standards are much lower.

It’s a lesson Americans have had to learn more than once—that knowing truth from fiction, making one’s own decisions rather than following opinions of the herd, or cult figures, is the world most Americans prefer to live and prosper in.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Why Kill Social Security?

 Answering Kennedy’s Call

“Let's say social security didn't send out their checks this month. My mother who’s 94, she wouldn’t call and complain. She'd think something got messed up, and she'll get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming, yelling and complaining.” Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick

It’s a sign of Republican Party and the Trump/Musk administration’s extreme incompetence (and naviete) if they believe Americans will buy Howard Lutnick’s story that only fraudsters would care if our seniors miss a social security payment when a major share of seniors list their monthly social security payment as their major (and only) source of income!

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s comments thereby reveal why Republicans and Trump want to  at least damage it enough that Republicans can privatize it for their Wall Street cronies.

It is an insane attempt to destroy social security in its current form, of course, and a reflection of Republicans’ efforts to dumb down its mostly red state electorate.

Even GW Bush attempted it, to no avail when the profit windfall that brokers would reap for managing it as a private pension fund was revealed ($5Billion at the time), which would come out of taxpayers’ pockets, of course.

Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman in a recent Substack column said why they are so blatant about it: the differences in education and the information media their red stater supporters have access to. Sixty three percent of Republican/Trump voters in 2024 were less than college educated.

Paul Krugman

Krugman also pictured who will be most harmed by his attempt to destroy social security. It will be our elderly and retired with a high school education or less, with 60 percent of their income comes from social security. And these are Republicans’ main red state supporters.

They tried something similar in Trump’s first term with more than 30 attempts to repeal Obamacare. It was a major reason Trump lost to Biden in 2020. It should be the main reason Republicans lose at least the House of Representatives in the upcoming 2026 midterm election.

The only real way to combat this wall of ignorance is with a better information infrastructure, or more effective propaganda machine, if we want to call it that. It will be necessary to expose the blatant ignorance Republicans have historically relied on to maintain their power in the red states and with swing voters that pay less attention to political news, polls have shown.

AOC and Bernie Sanders are having rallies in red and purple states like Arizona and Colorado talking what makes “common sense” to most American voters, and that have been effective in drawing up to 50,000 member crowds, for starters.

Trump/Musk are blindly rushing ahead with Musk’s so-called DOGE efficiency drive and Trump’s tariff wars that could cause horrendous damage to our economy, when there are much better ways to accomplish their stated goals of lowering regulations and decreasing the budget deficit and national debt.

Such haste is causing irreparable damage to lives and livelihoods; just as Musk’s failure to correct Tesla’s design flaws have killed people. There are better ways, and maybe the SCOTUS 5-4 ruling that Trump can’t indiscriminately fire federal workers without cause can begin to slow down the wholesale destruction enough to prevent a very large economic ‘fire’ and even a major recession, I said last week.

There is a lesson to be learned. The Tesla automobile’s sometimes fatal design flaws seem to be because of his lack of attention to details in his single-minded drive to invent new and better technologies, just as Trump’s pre-occupation with revenge and retribution clouds his thinking, and that of those that are tasked with carrying out his executive orders.

It's an opening that will combat the Republican Party’s nihilism, not to denigrate the less educated, but is common sense to most Americans—not tariffs that boost inflation and make enemies of our allies, or allow measles and bird flu epidemics to run their course rather than vaccinate, and bipartisan legislation that protects our borders rather than illegal deportations. The list goes on and on.

Common sense policies are something understood by all income groups and social classes that oligarchs and their enablers, the real fraudsters, don’t want Americans to know.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Incompetence = Recession

 Popular Economics Weekly

"Trumpian Incompetence will provoke a counterreaction, which will prove to be an opportunity and rebirth. When that happens people will be ready to hear the truth that Trump will never understand—that when you turn America into a vast extortion machine, you will get some short-term wins as weaker powers bend to your gangsterism, but you will burn the relationships, at and abroad, that are actually the source of American’s long-term might.” David Brooks NY Times

Reuters

I quoted David Brooks last week because people will be ready to hear the truth when they realize that Trump’s “vast extortion machine” won’t lower inflation but raise it, won’t eliminate waste and fraud but slash essential governmental services instead (such as social security), and cut regulations that actually prevent financial markets from crashing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent must therefore find excuses why inflation is still rising and the Trump/Musk administration isn’t finding much fraud, but tearing out the guts of government that make it work.

This is why Treasury Secretary Bessent is hinting at a recession in making excuses for their incompetence, because “The market and the economy have just become hooked, and we’ve become addicted to this government spending, and there’s going to be a detox period. There’s going to be a detox,”

It will take time for people to hear the truth because Trump’s executive orders are an attempt to stay ahead of the law and public media he reviles as they are uncovering his administration’s lawlessness and incompetence.

Trump believes such tactics will make him the autocrat and law unto himself he has always wanted to be; but only if the tariffs cause other countries cave in to his demands without retaliating for which the US will protect them militarily and favor them economically.

It is why Trump keeps repeating that he wants to corral Greenland, the Panama Canal, Canada and even Mexico into his new “extortion machine”.

The craziness of his intentions shows tremendous ignorance of economics and history. We haven’t done very well in protecting anyone militarily since World War Two. Even the Korean War was a stalemate after our strategic withdrawal from the Yalu River when China entered the war.

Vietnam ended with a complete withdrawal. The Afghanistan exit may have been the most humiliating retreat after our 20-year occupation, and the Iraq war ended up strengthening Iran’s influence by eliminating Saddam Hussein, its arch enemy.

Trump’s history also reveals that he has never cared about most of those that voted for him. History ProfessortimothTimothy Snyder has said his real constituents that he wants to please are fellow autocrats and dictators Russia’s Putin and China’s Xi Jinping.

Musk’s incompetence is also damaging our national security. Heather Cox Richardson reports “Sharon LaFraniere, Minho Kim, and Julie Tate of the New York Times reported that cuts to the top secret National Nuclear Security Administration have meant the loss of critical employees—from scientists and engineers through accountants and lawyers—at the agency that manages the nation’s 3,748 nuclear bombs and warheads.”

Musk is damaging our financial security as well. Judd Legum of Popular Information has reported in various interviews that an internal memo from the Social Security Administration, written by acting deputy commissioner Doris Diaz, called for requiring beneficiaries to visit a field office to provide identification if they cannot access the internet to complete verification there.

This is while they are closing Social Security offices. Diaz predicted “service disruption,” “operational strain,” and “budget shortfalls” that would create increased “challenges for vulnerable populations.”

Tariffs won’t balance the budget and take away the need for other taxes (like income taxes) either, because the targeted nations are already retaliating. The modern world is far more complex. President Mckinley’s first Gilded Age that Trump so admires used tariffs because we needed them to protect our young steel and manufacturing industries.

The first Gilded Age ended because massive corruption was unearthed during Teddy Roosevelt’s trust-busting progressive era, which led to creation of the Federal Reserve, income taxes and eventually FDR’s New Deal to protect us from future Robber Barons.

Karl Rove as GW Bush’s campaign manager and Republicans also openly yearned for a return to the McKinley’s Gilded Age. Tariffs have worked in developing new or better industries, which is why the Biden administration used them to protect our computer chip industry, which is a national security priority.

The president’s tariff authority is based on the need to protect our national security, whereas Trump wants to use it to protect his own grandiose ideas, as the authoritarian ruler he has always wanted to be.

David Brooks is right. The American public will eventually see the harm Trump's extortion machine will cause Americans as well as our friends and allies. And that by leaving the alliances that protect US—not only NATO, but the World Health Organization that protects against more pandemics, the Paris Accord where nations have agreed to bring down greenhouse gasses—we will be less secure.

Please to God this happens before we must go through another recession, or pandemic, or both.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

What Happened to the Budget?

 Popular Economics Weekly

“The House Republican budget passed today calls for massive cuts in health coverage, food assistance, and help paying for college, among some other areas, to pay for huge tax giveaways for wealthy households and businesses.” CBPP.org

CBPP.org

President Trump had to know that devoting a large part of his State of the Union speech insulting Democrats would make it much more difficult to forge a budget for the fiscal year that ends September 30, when they will need Democrats’ support because of their thin majorities.

It will make it all but impossible to ratify an annual budget that significantly reduces the budget deficit. It’s not a great way to negotiate, in other words, unless Republicans don’t believe they need Democrats to fund their tax cuts.

House Republicans have passed a purely Republican budget resolution that relies on massive cuts to federal programs that the Center For Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonpartisan research and policy organization, recently analyzed.

“The House budget would require the Energy and Commerce Committee to cut at least $880 billion; the Agriculture Committee to cut at least $230 billion; the Education and Workforce Committee to cut at least $330 billion; and other committees to also cut programs to reach a cumulative target of at least $1.5 trillion in cuts through 2034. The magnitude of these reductions would force congressional committees to make enormous cuts in Medicaid, SNAP, student loan assistance and other vital sources of support when they develop the “reconciliation” spending and tax bill that follows the budget resolution.” CBPP

Yet Republicans must compromise with Democrats to pass the annual budget that keeps the federal government open for business because of their paper-thin majorities in both the House and Senate, as I said. And the Democrats’ cooperation will require that some of their own budget priorities be included.

Trump must know by insulting Democrats he won’t get much of what he wants. He must believe there is a better way to narrow the budget deficit. Of course, he and Elon Musk have said so out loud—find some $2 billion in savings in the current budget that totals more than $4.2 trillion at last count.

Instead, Trump/Musk are firing federal employees and closing whole agencies with abandon to make their case that it will eliminate enough fraud and waste to bring down the deficit to justify their tax cuts. But it can’t happen without cuts to the sacred third rails as well—social security, Medicare and Medicaid.

They will be slowed down in their haste to downsize government because most of the DOGE work to date seems to be illegal, according to the many lawsuits that have been filed to stop the DOGE efficiency drive.

It will end up being a failed “Shock and Awe” campaign, according to Thomas Friedman, since their real intent is to cut government “down to the size where one could drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub,” to quote Grover Norquist, a Republican  strategist.

AtlantaFed

And we might already be seeing evidence of the damage; such as predictions of negative first quarter economic growth for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model of real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2025 is -2.4 percent on March 6, up from -2.8 percent on March 3.

Tariff fears are part of the problem, as importers are ordering as much as possible before tariffs kick in that will raise prices, and that subtracts from GDP growth. But consumer spending in the new year that powers 60 percent of economic growth has declined because of their exhausted savings.

Consumer spending could shrink even further as the federal job firings and layoffs accelerate. MarketWatch reports some 172,017 job cuts were unveiled in February by U.S.-based employers, according to the monthly report by the outplacement firm Challenger Gray & Christmas. That’s the highest total since July 2020.

“It was chiefly because of a large reduction in government employees from actions by Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or ”DOGE,” purportedly to reduce bureaucracy,” said MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash.

Challenger put the federal job cuts at 62,242 last month, up from just 151 in January and February combined in 2024. Historically, very few federal employees lose their jobs annually. Retail and tech companies also announced sizable layoffs in February.

Economist Claudia Sahm said in a CNBC interview that such a massive number of workers losing their jobs at once has never happened before and will be flooding the job market.

I can’t imagine what such a large loss of jobs will do to our economy this year, even though federal jobs are a small part of the US workforce.

Harlan Green © 2025

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

A Greater Lawlessness—Self Interest vs. The Common Interest

Popular Economics Weekly

Are we at the beginning of an era of Greater Lawlessness, or nearing the end with the greatest law breaking we may have seen in our lifetime? And are we at the beginning or end of the greatest wealth accumulation by the wealthiest, of another Gilded Age that last happened in 1900, at the beginning of the Industrial Age?

In a potentially bombshell report, CNN reported Wednesday night that the FBI has information that suggests members of President Donald Trump’s team may have colluded with Russian operatives to coordinate the release of damaging information in an effort to torpedo Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

FBI Director James Comey had already testified in televised House hearings that the Trump campaign team was under criminal investigation for collusion with Russian intelligence operatives in trying to undermine the legitimacy of US elections and democracy in general.

Such interference by Russian and even Wikileaks has led to the election of possibly the most corrupt President in US history, with his refusal to divest himself of his assets that are creating countless conflicts of interest, as well as blatantly ignoring the emoluments clause of the US Constitution that prohibits presidents from being compensated by foreign governments.

How did the US, leader of the free and democratic world since WWII, become so weak and vulnerable that Russian hackers could help to elect Donald Trump, an openly pro-Putin ally who wants to implement the Kremlin’s own foreign policies and subvert those of the democratic western world?

We have had major lawbreaking by Presidents before with Nixon’s Watergate, which was a break into Democratic National Committee headquarters to steal their election plans. Sound familiar?

Then there was President Reagan and the Iran-Contra Affair in the 1980s, which entailed the secret shipping of some $8 million in weapons to Khomeini’s Iranian government to aid them in their Iraq war, and more than 250 criminal convictions of Reagan era office holders for law breaking.

This was in part because President Reagan considered government the problem, and therefore its laws and regulations to be subverted or ignored when inconvenient to his goals.

What were those goals? It’s in fact a long story, but one that can be summarized easily. Such a greater lawlessness of elected representatives and presidents in particular, began with the concerted push to transfer greater wealth to the already wealthy begun in the 1970s and catalogued best in Jacob Hacker & Paul Pierson’s Winner-Take-All Politics. It was the beginning of massive tax cuts, and gutting of labor protection laws, the backbone of middle class prosperity, which weakened labor’s ability to both organize and bargain collectively, and resulted in the massive globalization of the labor force.

These policies were implemented under the rationale that self-interest trumped the common interest championed by governments, and therefore those laws that supported public interest should be subordinate to private interests. Its ideologues and supporters advocated an economic program called trickle-down economics that maintained the owners of capital knew best how to run a country and create the greatest prosperity for all with only the most minimal government regulations and protections, in order to maintain US leadership as a world power.

This led to the abuses of the housing bubble and wholesale loss of middle class wealth from overleveraged Wall Street, a shadow banking system, and failure of financial institutions such as Lehman Brothers that bankrupted millions of ordinary workers.

It led to the Great Recession, which did as much damage to the US economy as the much longer Great Depression, but without the leadership of an FDR and Francis Perkins, his Labor Secretary, who created most of the modern social safety net, including social security and the Fair Labor Standards Act, the first minimum wage and overtime laws for American workers.

It has also led to the greatest income inequality since the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929, which in turn led to the polarized electorate we have today. There is very little left of the middle class created after WWII that grew due to New Deal legislation that protected unions and collective bargaining, funded early education and government research that gave US the technological edge.

Under the aegis of a revolt against globalization, we have instead elected those who believe healthcare should be restricted only to those that can afford it, a government so diminished that it no longer is able to protect the environment, educate all in public schools and tuition-free public universities, or protect the public from Wall Street excesses, (which means another recession is inevitable).

All this could only have happened with the greater lawlessness we have today that a president and White House make no attempt to hide. President Trump seems to believe in the Mafia code, a code that trusts only his family and closest associates, where the only honor is the honor among thieves, some of whom are turning out to be Russian oligarchs whose stolen wealth he is more than happy to launder in his various real estate holdings.

CNN, basing its report on unnamed U.S. officials, said the evidence is largely circumstantial and is not yet conclusive, though the investigation is ongoing and is now focusing on the possibility of that collusion. The FBI’s information is based on “human intelligence, travel, business and phone records and accounts of in-person meetings,” CNN said.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) went a step further Wednesday, telling MSNBC “there is more than circumstantial evidence now” of collusion with Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

So is this the beginning, or the end of an era of rampant lawlessness that began almost 50 years ago, and that few of the lawbreakers have paid for, from Presidents to Wall Street financiers?

Maybe the various investigations will help is to understand what has happened to the no longer United States of America?

Harlan Green © 2017

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Why The Years of Slow Growth?

Popular Economics Weekly

Pundits have decried it. Donald Trump has criticized the ‘lousy’ U.S. economy in many of his Tweets, and economists have lamented the 2.4 percent GDP growth rate since 2000, at the time of the dot-com bubble bust. This is when prior recoveries have averaged 3-4 percent growth—at least in the early years.
The agonizingly slow pace of recovery from the Great Recession is easy to explain, say most economists. The Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a labor think tank, recently said it best. It is the result of austerity policies championed by Republican policymakers at the federal and state levels.

“Like every other postwar recession before it, the Great Recession was caused by a shortfall in aggregate demand, meaning that the spending of households, businesses, and governments was not sufficient to keep the economy’s resources fully employed,” said the EPI.

Graph: EPI

Per capita government spending in the first quarter of 2016—27 quarters into the recovery—was nearly 3.5 percent lower than it was at the trough of the Great Recession. By contrast, 27 quarters into the early 1990s recovery, per capita government spending was 3 percent higher than at the trough; 23 quarters following the early 2000s recession (a shorter recovery), it was 10 percent higher; and 27 quarters into the early 1980s recovery, it was 17 percent higher.

What is aggregate demand, and how is it increased? FDR’s incredibly intelligent Fed Chairman Marriner Eccles explained it in his memoir Beckoning Frontiers (1951):

“As mass production has to be accompanied by mass consumption, mass consumption, in turn, implies a distribution of wealth ... to provide men with buying power. ... Instead of achieving that kind of distribution, a giant suction pump had by 1929-30 drawn into a few hands an increasing portion of currently produced wealth. ... The other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped.”

He understood our U.S. economy was entering the era of mass consumption, and unless consumers plus businesses plus government spent and/or invested enough money in it, there would be little or no growth. If fact, it was the severity of the contraction in spending that caused both the Great Depression and Great Recession.

And because there was record income inequality in 1929—only equaled again in 2007—consumers ran out of money to spend, which meant in turn businesses stopped investing. So it had to be government that injected sufficient demand into the U.S. economy to keep it from collapsing completely. That was the reason for the New Deal that employed millions in government-paid jobs, as well as social security, unemployment insurance and all the social programs that enabled US to win WWII.

The pickup in government spending in the early 2000s recession and 1980s recovery were during Republican administrations (i.e., during GW Bush and Reagan presidencies), which meant they had no problem spending public monies to boost economic growth. But when it came to Obama’s term, every attempt was made by the mostly Republican House in particular to cause him to fail.

It began with the election of some 80 Tea Party members to the House in 2010, then government shutdown in 2011 when they refused to ok a budget, so that the U.S. government almost ran out of operating funds, resulting in the first loss of AAA rating for U.S. debt by a bond rating agency in modern history.

That is why real annual GDP growth during Reagan’s term peaked at 7.3 percent, and GW Bush’s term at 3.8 percent. The highest modern growth rate was achieved during FDR’s New Deal and WWII, which boosted U.S. growth to a peak of 18.9 percent in 1942. Real GDP growth (i.e,, after inflation) has been downhill ever since.

Graph: CBS

As CBS News recently wrote in a report entitled, Obama May Become First President Since Hoover Not to See 3% GDP Growth: “The last year that real GDP grew by 3.0 percent or more, according to BEA, was in 2005, when it grew by 3.3 percent. Since then, the United States has gone a record ten straight years (2006-2015) without a year in which the growth in real GDP was at least 3.0 percent.”

So in fact without government spending to boost demand during slow times our economy has suffered. And now President-elect Trump has proposed a $1 trillion infrastructure spending plan that is sure to boost growth again.

“Despite the Great Recession being the sharpest and longest on record since World War II,” wrote the EPI, “and despite monetary policy reaching its conventional limits to boost spending early in the recession, policymakers made damaging decisions to limit public spending following the recession’s trough in 2009. This growth has been historically slow relative to other business cycles even as the economy needed substantially faster-than-average growth to mount a full and timely recovery.”

So let the record show, government has never been the problem when Republicans needed to boost growth, only when Democrats do. What is wrong with this picture?

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Hillary Clinton, A New FDR?

Popular Economics Weekly

Even President Obama, among others, has said Hillary Clinton is one of the most qualified presidential candidates ever. And she has been advocating a new New Deal for America, including tuition-free public universities and colleges, paid maternity leave, child care, expanded social security and Medicare benefits, as well as more public investment at a time when the private sector has severely cut back on productive investment of any kind.

She would also be our first female president. So how should we compare her to FDR, our father figure during the Great Depression and WWII, at a time of economic suffering from the second worst depression we have just lived through?

What is little know is that the major New Deal programs created during the Great Depression, including Social Security, unemployment insurance, and the 40-yr work week, were designed and created by a female Labor Secretary, Francis Perkins, whom he had brought with him from his New York state governorship.

During her term as Secretary of Labor from 1933 to 1946, Secretary Perkins created the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Public Works Administration (WPA), and the labor portion of the National Recovery Industrial Act. With the Social Security Act, she established unemployment benefits and pensions for the many uncovered elderly Americans, and welfare for the poorest Americans. She pushed to reduce workplace accidents and helped craft laws against child labor. Through the Fair Labor Standards Act, she established the first minimum age and overtime laws for American workers, and defined the standard forty-hour work week.

Yes, Francis Perkins, a woman, was the real designer and implementer of most of the New Deal programs, without which we would not have weathered the Great Depression with enough economic strength to win WWII.

So might Hillary Clinton provide a similar vision for America during these divided times when so much of the rest of the world wants what we have? Her drive to provide tuition-free public colleges is a first step.

The now $1 trillion in student debt is holding back economic growth, for starters. It prevents students from investing in their future growth, such as a profession they prefer, rather than continuing to pay for the past investment in themselves. It has held back the number of college graduate that both earn higher salaries and are more fully employed than non-college graduates.

A recent NBER Working Paper by economist Enrico Moretti, showed a percentage point increase in the supply of college graduates raises high school drop-outs' wages by 1.9 percent, high school graduates' wages by 1.6 percent, and college graduates wages by 0.4 percent. The effect is larger for less educated groups, as predicted by a conventional demand and supply model. But even for college graduates, an increase in the supply of college graduates increases wages, as predicted by a model that includes conventional demand and supply factors as well as spillovers, said Dr. Moretti.

Graph: CAP

It is particularly important that the United States increases its investment in postsecondary education in the face of rising competition from its international peers, and having government take on the burden of public university debt is a first step. As recently as 1996, the United States had the second highest share of adults who had earned postsecondary education credentials and the highest share of adults with university degrees, in part because there was little or no tuition until the 1970s, when governments began to cut back on their share of state university funding, which was then taken up by rising tuition fees.

More recently, however, America’s level of achievement has fallen behind other nations. In 2012, the most recent year measured, the United States ranked fifth in the percentage of adults who had earned postsecondary education credentials, according to the Center for American Progress. Even more worrisome, the share of young Americans—those between the ages of 25 and 34—with postsecondary credentials has dropped to 12th relative to other nations, while those possessing university degrees fell to 14th.

Why is Hillary so qualified? President Roosevelt had a history of public service, first as Assistant Secretary of the Navy, then New York Governor, before serving as our President from 1932-45. Hillary has had 30 years of service, including as a State Senator, Secretary of State, and First Lady. And such a broad record of service is what it will take to even begin to heal our fractured society.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen