Showing posts with label community development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label community development. Show all posts

Thursday, August 10, 2023

Guest Opportunity for Podcasters

 Answering Kennedy’s Call


About Harlan Green

§ Harlan Russell Green is 2023 Winner of the Peace Corps Writers’ Publisher’s Award Jul 31, 2023

§ Harlan Russell Green (Turkey 1964–66) 2023 Publisher’s Award Building Community: Answering Kennedy’s Call, Harlan Green’s memoir of his years working to build successful communities…

§ Editor and Publisher of PopularEconomics.com, dedicated to “Enhancing the Popular Understanding of Economics”, a financial columnist who has been interviewed by international news outlets, and a documentary filmmaker and photographer. He is also the author of The Mystery of Money, Understanding the Modern Financial World, has a B.S. in Economics from UC Berkeley, and M.S. in Public Communications (COM ’82) from Boston University.

§ A lifelong advocate of livable communities, he was a Peace Corps Volunteer in a rural community development program in Turkish villages, joined the US Environmental Protection Agency at its inception to publicize its activities in the Western Region, and became a member of César Chávez’s United Farmworkers Union during its organizing struggles, before contributing to his own community planning effort that resulted in a new city.

Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Tuesday, June 13, 2023

 Answering Kennedy’s Call

 CHAPTER ELEVEN

Old Town’s Revival

Chapter Eleven is an excerpt from my memoir that discusses tools needed to form a community consensus. Our effort was dedicated to redevelopment of Old Town Goleta, prior to forming the new City of Goleta.

But such techniques to build consensus could apply to climate change. The Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act will begin to implement the new legislation in disadvantaged communities with tax credits and outright grants to start up new projects and clean up their communities of toxic wastes.

The dream of forming a new city of Goleta was revived once its former Old Town center has been approved for redevelopment by Santa Barbara County, but what are the requirements for a livable community?

As recently as 2005, the Institute of American Architects said that

. . . broadly speaking, a livable community recognizes its own unique identity and places a high value on the planning processes that help manage growth and change to maintain and enhance its community character.

There had been several unsuccessful efforts to form a city since the 1970s.

The Goleta Old Town Revitalization Committee, a mix of local officials and residents that wanted Old Town’s infrastructure and services upgraded, was now created, and I was appointed its chairman.

The first task was to find such an identity that could unite a diverse community. The Goleta Valley’s Old Town was its 100-year-old historical center that could provide a unique sense of identity to a new city.

Hearings were held in Old Town’s Community Center so county planners could learn what Goleta’s residents wanted for a future town center. We were following the precepts of community organizing in bringing citizens together to solve some of the problems afflicting such a diverse community.

The Goleta Valley in many ways was a microcosm of small-town America and all that had happened to those communities since the sixties: rapid population growth with little concern for the environment. It had an early history combining both rural and urban life with industrial and research centers while being adjacent to the Santa Barbara Airport.

Our new organization (that included several future Goleta city mayors) was more than a redevelopment district because we believed it could aid in giving the Goleta Valley its “own unique identity” that planners and architects deemed requisite for a livable community.

I had read and was influenced by M. Scott Peck’s book The Different Drum, describing the elements that bring a community together to achieve whatever they want. His approach epitomized for me the essence of community development. Dr. Peck, a medical doctor, psychologist, and author of a better-known prequel, The Road Less Traveled, broke down the steps that a community goes through to come together in a meaningful way in The Different Drum.

He warned that the process could take time. Any community usually goes through four stages to reach agreement and to be able to function effectively, whatever its goals. He characterized these stages as Pseudo community, Chaos, Emptiness, and (true) Community.

Pseudo community is the first gathering of any group with the initial pleasantries and avoidance of conflict in the desire to be nice to each other. But it is a false community, because until the second stage of Chaos is reached, individual differences aren’t revealed, and a discussion of the real problems doesn’t surface.

Chaos described the early stages of our hearings when open discussions brought out the conflict between those residents who loved Old Town’s funkiness and cheap rents, and those landlords and landowners who wanted to improve their properties. The goal of the Old Town Advisory Committee was to bring the sides together. There was also a Goleta Beautiful organization that wanted to preserve and restore some of the more historic Old Town structures.

Dr. Peck’s third stage is Emptiness: a time of resignation, when the group or organization gives up their individual prejudices, ideologies, control needs, and begins to see what can be accomplished as a group. In Old Town, it wasn’t until the second year of the hearings that this happened. More Old Town residents were put on the committee, and we began to see a vision of what a revitalized Old Town could be for the Goleta community.

After many hearings and dialogues with planners, architects, developers, and residents that included a weekend Design Charette that I will discuss in a later chapter, the committee members began to have a sense that we were all in this together and would be able to create something beneficial that was a (true) community.

Dr. Peck wrote:

. . . initially I thought this book’s title should be “Peacemaking and Community”. But that would put the cart before the horse. For I fail to see how we Americans could effectively communicate with the Russians, (or any peoples of other cultures) when we don’t even know how to communicate with the neighbors next door, much less the neighbors on the other side of the tracks.

In our culture of rugged individualism— in which we generally feel that we dare not be honest about ourselves, even with the person in the pew next to us—we bandy around the word, “community”. . . [but] if we are to use the word meaningfully, we must restrict it to a group of individuals who have learned how to communicate honestly with each other.1

The Old Town Revitalization Committee needed two years and 100 hearings to form the Old Town Revitalization Plan.

The final report approved by the County on June 16, 1998, stated: “The purpose and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan are to eliminate the conditions of blight existing in the proposed Project Area and to prevent the recurrence of blighting conditions in said Area.”

It took four more years and another election to transfer what we learned in revitalizing Old Town to create the new City of Goleta in 2002 encompassing most of the Goleta Valley, but this was its start.

_______________________

1 Peck, M. Scott. The Different Drum. Simon & Schuster, 1987. P. 56

Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Saturday, March 4, 2023

Goleta's Old Town Flood

 CHAPTER THIRTEEN

Designing a New City Center

Goletahistory.com

    Many of us believed that a re-design of Old Town Goleta
would be an ideal location to practice some of the precepts of
True Urbanism, or Smart Planning, that could aid in the design
for a new city. These were labels attached to what is now a
worldwide movement.

    Flooding was also a major concern, despite periodic
droughts. Santa Barbara and the South Coast had suffered
several devastating floods during the 1990s that ended a prior
8-year drought.

    The flood that broke the drought was called the March
Miracle: in March 1991, 23 inches of rain fell, even flooding the
Santa Barbara Municipal Airport and closing it for several days.

    A second flood in 1995 caused another flooding of Old
Town Goleta’s main street. A three-foot deep stream of water from a
torrential rainfall overflowed San Jose creek at one end of Old
Town’s boundaries adjacent to a Nissan car dealer’s lot.

    More than 40 cars parked in the lot were swamped with several thrown into a culvert that diverted the flood waters onto Old Town’s main street.

    A climate scientist later said that the creek
would no longer be adequate for containing flooding because
the hard paved streets and roof surfaces in the surrounding
neighborhoods had replaced the soil that had absorbed excess
rainfall.

    Now the creek carried almost all of the rain’s runoff.
Hence flood control improvements, such as an enlarged
creek bed to carry the increased runoff, were required in the
CEQA report as the first step in any redevelopment effort.

    The droughts and consequential flooding also made everyone
aware of the limited water supplies in California, as well as the
potentially devastating drought/flood cycle. In fact, California’s
latest six-year drought ended (in 2017) with the greatest rainfall totals for Northern California since the 1880s.

Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Sunday, February 26, 2023

Chapter Eleven - Building a Livable Community

 

Old Town’s Revival

As we began to redesign Goleta’s Old Town District, we realized our efforts might apply to a livable city as well.

As recently as 2005, the Institute of American Architects defined a such a community as. . . “broadly speaking, a livable community recognizes its own unique identity and places a high value on the planning processes that help manage growth and change to maintain and enhance its community character.”

Thoughts of forming a new city of Goleta were also revived, as the actual planning of Old Town’s future began. There had been several unsuccessful efforts to form a city since the 1970s. The Goleta Old Town Revitalization Committee, a mix of local officials and residents that wanted Old Town’s infrastructure and services upgraded, was now created, and I was appointed its chairman. Hearings were held in Old Town’s Community building so county planners could learn what Goleta’s residents wanted for a future town center. We were following the precepts of community organizing in bringing citizens together to solve some of the problems afflicting such a diverse community.

Goleta in many ways was a microcosm of small-town America and all that had happened to those communities since the sixties: rapid population growth with little concern for the environment. It had an early history combining both rural and urban life with industrial and research centers while being adjacent to the Santa Barbara Airport. I wanted to participate in this organization (that included some future Goleta city mayors), because it could aid in giving the Goleta Valley its “own unique identity” that planners and architects deemed requisite for a livable community.

I had read and was influenced by M. Scott Peck’s book The Different Drum, describing the elements that bring a community together to achieve whatever they want. His approach epitomized for me the essence of community development. Dr. Peck, a medical doctor, psychologist, and author of a better-known prequel, The Road Less Traveled, broke down the steps that a community goes through to come together in a meaningful way in The Different Drum.

He warned that the process could take time. Any community usually goes through four stages to reach agreement and to be able to function effectively, whatever its goals. He characterized these stages as Pseudo community, Chaos, Emptiness, and (true) Community.

Pseudo community is the first gathering of any group with the initial pleasantries and avoidance of conflict in the desire to be nice to each other. But it is a false community, because until the second stage of Chaos is reached, individual differences aren’t revealed, and a discussion of the real problems doesn’t surface.

Chaos described the early stages of our hearings when open discussions brought out the conflict between those residents who loved Old Town’s funkiness and cheap rents, and those landlords and landowners who wanted to improve their properties. The goal of the Old Town Advisory Committee was to bring the sides together. There was also a Goleta Beautiful organization that wanted to preserve and restore some of the more historic Old Town structures.

Dr. Peck’s third stage is Emptiness: a time of resignation, when the group or organization gives up their individual prejudices, ideologies, control needs, and begins to see what can be accomplished as a group. In Old Town, it wasn’t until the second year of the hearings that this happened. More Old Town residents were put on the committee, and we began to see a vision of what a revitalized Old Town could be for the Goleta community.

After many hearings and dialogues with planners, architects, developers, and residents that included a weekend Design Charrette that I will discuss in a later chapter, the committee members began to have a sense that we were all in this together and would be able to create something beneficial for the community.

Dr. Peck wrote:

". . . initially I thought this book’s title should be “Peacemaking and Community”. But that would put the cart before the horse. For I fail to see how we Americans could effectively communicate with the Russians, (or any peoples of other cultures) when we don’t even know how to communicate with the neighbors next door, much less the neighbors on the other side of the tracks."

In our culture of rugged individualism— in which we generally feel that we dare not be honest about ourselves, even with the person in the pew next to us—we bandy around the word, “community”. . . [but] if we are to use the word meaningfully, we must restrict it to a group of individuals who have learned how to communicate honestly with each other.1

The Old Town Revitalization Committee needed two years and 100 hearings to finally form the Old Town Revitalization Plan.

Once the Plan’s CEQA (California’s Environmental Quality Act) study was approved—a study required to name and mitigate the environmental hazards we might encounter—the County applied to the state of California for the formation of a Goleta Old Town Redevelopment Plan, which would allow a percentage of the tax monies to be withheld for use in Old Town to upgrade its housing, improve San Jose Creek that flowed under its main thoroughfare, and infrastructure.

The final report approved by the County on June 16, 1998, stated: “The purpose and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan are to eliminate the conditions of blight existing in the proposed Project Area and to prevent the recurrence of blighting conditions in said Area.”



1 Peck, M. Scott. The Different Drum. Simon & Schuster, 1987. P. 56

Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Building Community Answering Kennedy's Call Book Review

 

Building Community, Answering Kennedy’s Call by Harlan Russell Green A Peace Corps Writers Book, 2022.

This memoir will take members of ERFSA back to the “good old days” when you might have been protesting the war in Vietnam or marching for Civil Rights before, during or after finishing graduate school. Building Community, Answering Kennedy’s Call certainly did that for me. The author, Harlan Green, joined the first wave of Peace Corps Volunteers in 1962 on the verge of graduating from UC Berkeley, with much uncertainty as to what his next step should be.

This was his lucky moment because the experience of trying to mobilize villagers in a remote Turkish village stayed a course for his life. In this brief, but well written and engaging memoir, Harlan takes to Ishmet Pasha with neither electricity or running water in 1962. Fortunately, Harlan had learned basic carpentry skills with his father while growing up and through a sincere effort to learn the Muslim villagers’ language so he could understand what they wanted, in addition to what he thought they needed, the tough experience yield results as well as path and philosophy he carried forward after completing the two year mission.

The story becomes increasingly interesting and its significance is peeled back Harlan Green returns to the States to become involved in other social movements of the 1960s and 70s. He studied film making in San Francisco and then was hired by the Environmental Protection Agency where he honed his camera chops on such issues as airplane safety and urban air quality in Los Angeles. Recounts of later work as a film maker for with Ceasar Chavez and the United Farm Workers during in 1974 are especially compelling .

This is a quick yet serious read. It could never be called a “blast from the past” because of the depth of the author’s commitment to bringing positive change into our world. It would be inspirational for undergraduates. I wished momentarily for a syllabus that I could include Building Community , Answering Kennedy’s Call as required reading.

Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Sunday, September 11, 2022

How Should We Remember 9/11?

ANSWERING KENNEDY’S CALL

BuildingCommunity

I wanted to remember 9/11 when I wrote my memoir on the Kennedy era that has just been released. It was also a time of busted communities, and a Vietnam War that split Americans. It was an Imperial America that wanted to make the world in its image, rather than create peaceful change that tolerated other peoples and cultures such as I worked for during the following years, after President Kennedy’s death.

I began writing this memoir about my work in public service in 2017, after wondering how it was possible that Americans had elected a president suffering a severe mental disorder. Did it mean our democracy was dying or already dead, and Americans now wanted a demagogue as president who believed that he was above all laws and the constitution?

It reminded me in many ways of the 1960s when there was just as much social unrest and different ideas of democracy. This was the era of McCarthyism and communist witch-hunting, right wing against left wing political views, the civil rights movement, and an unpopular war in Vietnam that was fracturing American communities.

We coped with the dysfunction and cynicism then by searching for communities that could mirror our values and ideals, and when we found them, to contribute to their growth.

I am writing about my years working to develop successful communities to show that it is possible to do it today in the face of so much social unrest that has created deep divisions and the possibility of future wars.

I believe that spirit of service is alive in younger generations that also want to make their country a better place. Many of them in the Millennial and Generation Z population groups are also searching for like-minded communities that serve a greater cause, that will bring people together in common purpose rather than separate them.

The Peace Corps was such a cause I believed in. I became a Peace Corps Volunteer to work in a program that improved the lives of Turkish farmworkers. A few years later I joined the Environmental Protection Agency at its inception because it was an organization dedicated to protecting the environment with the newly enacted Clean Water and Air Acts.

My membership in the United Farmworkers Union under César Chávez later in the mid-1970s was more happenstance. A cousin of mine in the construction trades roped me into helping him rebuild the UFW’s new headquarters, and it was extremely difficult to withstand the charisma of its founder and president, César Chávez. I was soon swept up in his vision of a union formed to improve the working conditions of Mexican farmworkers.

These were organizations dedicated to improving lives that taught me the fundamentals of healthy communities, fundamentals that enabled me to continue to improve the lives in my own community and led to the formation of a new California city.

There were many others doing what I did in that era. My history is one small part of the change that has been happening in American communities, towns, and cities whose members seek to improve their lives.

Former President Obama challenged Americans to inspire the youth to a life of service in 2017 after he left the presidency; and the youth he talked about are my target audience.  He said then:

We have some of the lowest voting rates of any democracy and low participation rates that translate into a further gap between who’s governing us and what we believe. The only folks who are going to be able to solve that problem are going to be young people, the next generation. And I have been encouraged everywhere I go in the United States, but also everywhere around the world to see how sharp and astute and tolerant and thoughtful and entrepreneurial our young people are. A lot more sophisticated than I was at their age. And so the question then becomes what are the ways in which we can create pathways for them to take leadership, for them to get involved?1

President Obama’s words came from his experience as a community organizer in Chicago. And studies show that Millennials and Generation Z youth now reaching adulthood want to make the world they have inherited a better place to live. Millennials’ preferences will be influential for no other reason than they are the largest generation ever, born from 1980 to 1996, outnumbering even their Baby Boomer parents.  They are also a much more diverse and tolerant population, which is why they are picking up where we left off in their preference for making worthwhile life choices. 

“Almost two-thirds (64 percent) of Millennials said they would rather make $40,000 a year at a job they love than $100,000 a year at a job they think is boring,” the Brookings Institution recently noted in a report by Morley Winograd and Michael Hais titled “How Millennials Could Upend Wall Street and Corporate America.”2

It cites a 2013 survey of over 1,200 U.S. adults that found Millennials to be the generation most focused on corporate social responsibility when making purchasing decisions.  Almost all Millennials responded with increased trust (91 percent) and loyalty (89 percent), as well as a stronger likelihood to buy from those companies that supported solutions to specific social issues (89 percent). A majority of Millennials reported buying a product that had a social benefit, and 84 percent of a generation that accounts for more than $1 trillion in U.S. consumer spending considered a company’s involvement in social causes in deciding what to buy or where to shop. In 2013, 89 percent of all American consumers said they would consider switching brands to one associated with a good cause if price and quality were equal.

One 30-year-old Millennial said in 2013, the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy’s death: “Though his [Kennedy’s] goals were typically big, what he sought from individuals was often rather small. Not everyone was expected to join the Peace Corps or become an astronaut or participate in the Freedom Rides. But citizens were asked to do their part—to think about how they could improve their community or make another person’s life easier—to look past their differences and focus on our common humanity. We badly need this message again. I believe it is one that resonates deeply with young Americans who are yearning for a time when we can search for new frontiers and once again be part of the same team.3

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Building Community Answering Kennedy's Call

 The Second Year Can Be Most Difficult

Chapter Four

It was becoming obvious that I wasn’t tolerating village life well by the end of my second year in Ismet Pasha, a village settled by Bulgarian Turks in the 1920s after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire. Though I involved myself as much as possible in village activities, and even donated a set of the annotated Koran in Turkish to their new library, I began to make longer trips to visit other volunteers to know what they were seeing and doing.

Clair, my female counterpart, had left after the first year and married another volunteer in our group. I was sad to see them leave because they were terrific workers, but Peace Corps rules were no cohabitation of partners unless already married!

I was even anxious when riding the buses for fear of being in an accident, becoming a nervous wreck who smoked a pack- a-day of their “Askerli” cigarettes in that second year. Its brand name was the Turkish word for soldier, and I never knew if it was created to provide the poorly paid Turkish soldier with something he could afford, since a pack cost 40 Kurush, $0.04 cents at the current exchange rate.

The tediousness of becoming a single volunteer was spelled by 45 days of paid vacation leave allowed by the Peace Corps during the two years of service, and semi-annual conferences that brought everyone together for progress reports.

We village volunteers were considered well paid at 60 dollars per month, the equivalent of a Turkish teacher’s salary. To put that in perspective, we could have a good restaurant meal for one dollar, and a haircut for 25 cents. In addition, we were allowed $7.50 per day of vacation allowance. I had money to travel on, as my rent for a small, one room adobe cottage was just $3 per month that second year.

Our own volunteer liaisons were made during holidays and our vacations. I and a female volunteer unfortunately overstayed our vacation time on the island of Rhodes during the winter school break because of a severe Mediterranean storm that capsized a tourist boat with the loss of 40 lives, isolating us long enough so that she was late for her assignment teaching English at a high school.

I was reprimanded for assisting in her delinquency through no fault of her own, and our Peace Corps country director at the time withdrew his offer to put me on training staff after completion of my two years. My loneliness had cost me the possibility of remaining in Turkey for a third year.

Not spending another year in Turkey was probably a good thing, as I was feeling more sad than happy as my two years of service came to an end. As difficult as it was to live in and absorb so much of a foreign culture, it was just as difficult to leave such an intensely emotional and personal experience. Turkish culture was based on very intense relationships; close emotional bonds of either love or hate in friendships as well as families, including strict behavioral guidelines we had to follow between the sexes.

We of Turkey V, the first volunteer rural community development group to serve in any Muslim country, were finally discharged in June of 1966, and it could not have been a day later for me. I had dodged attacks by Turkish sheepdogs, part of the feared and famous Anatolian Mastiff breed, ridden on horseback through sparkling winter snows under the clearest blue skies, weathered some scary illnesses, and was ready to return to western culture.

Had I made a difference, and what did the villagers end up thinking of me? There were so many highs and lows—the companionship with other volunteers that broke the tedium of village life, the vacation travel, visits to ancient, storied civilizations, and being part of such an ancient way of life that was barely changed by a few tractors and combines that sped up the planting and harvest.

Turkey in Later Years

As the Vietnam War dragged on, Americans and the American way did not look so peaceful to the rest of the world. This was one reason Peace Corps left Turkey after 10 years during which some 1600 hundred volunteers had served.

Opposition to the Vietnam War had grown in many European countries, and educated Turkish students were no exception. There were also serious gaffes by American officials, such as appointing former CIA employee Robert Comer to be the next U.S. Ambassador to Turkey. He had overseen the South Vietnamese village pacification plan, and his appointment as Ambassador to Turkey so enraged students that they overturned and burned his car during one of the many anti-war protests.

His predecessor, our own Peace Corps director, had earlier killed an elderly woman dressed in black while driving in Ankara one dark and rainy night. Because he had diplomatic immunity, he was spirited out of Turkey to avoid being charged with manslaughter.

That was not well-received by the students, either. Turkey and the Peace Corps administration agreed it was time to phase out the Peace Corps program that had lasted from 1961 to 1971, after students at several of the technical schools where Peace Corps volunteers taught held a vote and decided that the Peace Corps was no longer welcome.

My last year had been a very lonely, but productive, year, and I had no illusions that most villagers in this part of Anatolia with its semi-arid and mostly treeless environment would stay in their villages much longer. Their industrial revolution was now in full swing.

I hoped our presence there as volunteers had helped them consider us as their friends rather than obnoxious foreigners. I also hoped they saw us presenting a better, more peaceful side of American foreign policy that was more in line with the true face of the America I believed in, despite the Vietnam War.

I believe the Peace Corps Volunteers serving in Turkey did make a difference. We encouraged many of our villagers to work to develop their own land, instead of moving to the cities. Ismet Pasha’s villagers that remained were usually the most prosperous landowners that could exploit more modern farming techniques that I had helped to develop.

There was also talk of the Turks forming their own domestic volunteer corps that had a Turkish precedent. Educated Turkish males already had the option to teach in a village school instead of wearing a military uniform because Turkey had universal male military conscription. But I never knew if it was expanded into something that resembled the Peace Corps, in part because Turkey was changing so fast.

The Return to Turkey

Though today Turkey’s rural population has continued to grow, the percentage of the total population living in villages has declined because of rural-to-urban migration.

In 1970 about 67 percent of the population lived in villages. In 1980 the rural population had declined to 54 percent. Less than 21 percent of Turkey’s population still lived in villages in 2020, according to the World Bank.

That is why I was so startled on a return trip to Turkey. More than 30 years had passed since I left in 1966 and I wanted to know what remained of my work in Ismet Pasha. I had organized a tour group that landed at Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport during a national holiday. It was a shock to see the streets lined with many women covered from head to foot in traditional clothing as we were driven to our hotel. They had to be from the villages to dress so conservatively. It was evidence of the mass migration to cities and how much Istanbul, Turkey’s most European and cosmopolitan city, had changed.

I made a point of visiting Ismet Pasha during the tour, but it seemed a shell of its former self on my return. The mill that produced their flour was gone, a sign of the decline of village life. Its huge grindstone lay beside the road in front of the abandoned bakery building. The villagers no longer baked their own stone ground wheat bread that I remembered; giant kilo loaves steaming just out of the oven that I had enjoyed at meals when invited to dine with them.

The ethnic Turks who still lived in Ismet Pasha, including the son of the Mukhtar I had worked with during my two years, were doing well. Irrigation water was now plentiful from a fully developed irrigation system that watered a large sugar beet crop via elevated concrete canals that funneled water into the fields.

Ismet Pasha that had dirt roads and no electricity when I lived there, now had electricity and a paved main road that give them greater access to markets for their produce in all seasons, so their economic future looked bright.

But the village was also full of Kurds newly arrived from their homeland in eastern Turkey. They were the victims of Turkey’s ongoing war with Kurdish militants belonging to the PKK, their most radical political party that wanted an independent country of their own.

The war had dragged on for years and did not look like it would come to any resolution soon. Millions of Kurds still lived in Turkey and were forbidden to teach their language in the schools at the time.

The ethnic Turks to whom I spoke looked down on the Kurds as bad farmers, transplants that really did not fit in. The Kurds were thought of as a semi-nomadic herding culture, since many of them still lived in the mountains of Syria, Iran, and Turkey. But maybe all the good land around Ismet Pasha was taken, so there was nothing else for the Kurds forcibly transplanted from their homeland to do than raise lifestock? It looked like only families with the largest landholdings were able to take advantage of the new irrigation wells I first brought to the village.

But will Turkey ever become a sectarian democracy ruled by civil law rather than religious law? Or will they be saddled with their current devoutly religious President, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, an aspiring President-for-life intent on imposing a more religious theocracy rather than continuing their sputtering attemp and most of the remote rural villages ts to join the European Union?

I also saw that the community development precepts I learned in Peace Corps training worked in a Turkish village, because they were much like us, a practical people who believed success in the secular world was as important as the world promised by Islam. Who knows what future might be possible for such a hardworking people?

I felt good about what I had done, and it was now time to move on to find another community I might contribute to.

Harlan Green © 2022

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Answering the Kennedys’ Call


I recently attended the 10th anniversary of the Goleta Dam Dinner held at Lake Los Carneros, on a dam built long before the City of Goleta, California was formed.

Here in this relatively new and still small city, founded in 2002 and nestled beside its famous neighbor, Santa Barbara, were families of all ages and stages happily celebrating not only their sense of community spirit, but the natural beauty of its surroundings that is a unique blend of mountains and ocean located on the central California coast.

This made me realize how successful was the formation of this new, very livable, California city, where I had been privileged to live and help establish, in spite of the many obstacles to the formation of new governmental entities in recent years.

It was a successful community because of the attention paid to both the environment and safety concerns of its citizens—especially the children.

I know Goleta won’t make the list of The Economist Intelligence Unit’s annual Global Liveability Index that really only pays attention to larger cities, where we don’t see this community spirit and camaraderie.

Vienna was the top city on The Economists’ list, with Australia and Canada each having three cities in its top 10 listing of the better-known cities that made The Economists’ Liveability Index. .
  1. 1. Vienna, Austria
  2. 2. Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3. Sydney, Australia
  4. 4. Osaka, Japan
  5. 5. Calgary, Canada
  6. 6. Vancouver, Canada
  7. 7. Toronto, Canada
  8. 8. Tokyo, Japan
  9. 9. Copenhagen, Denmark
  10. 10. Adelaide, Australia
No U.S. city was in the top 20, with Honolulu ranking highest at No. 22. Atlanta came in 33rd place; Pittsburgh, 34th; and Seattle, 36th. New York was all the way down in the 58th spot, in part because of low scores for infrastructure, stability and possible crime issues.

That could be because it’s easier for the residents of smaller cities to confront city councils with their concerns—at least in the U.S. of A. It has to be why the City of Goleta became one of the 50 safest American cities in 2017, fifteen years after its formation, according to a survey by Safewise, a security firm.

What then does “liveability” mean? The Economist is a UK Magazine, which might serve as a bias for a more European civic viewpoint, perhaps. But the issue of safety is certainly at the forefront of making any community livable—especially for children.

And the rising tide of violence in American cities—so much so that in 1992 U.S. Surgeon General Everett Koop declared violence a public health emergency—means the situation in American cities hasn’t improved.
 
And now even more so when U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy was fired by President Trump in 2017 after he spoke against gun violence, calling it a public health issue that needs public investment, and stood in support of the victims in Orlando, Florida, where one of the worst mass shootings in American history had just occurred.

It also has much to do with so-called Smart Urban Planning. Architect Suzanne Lennard, and Psychiatrist Henry L. Lennard have written extensively on what makes communities livable in books such as The Forgotten Child (2000, Gondolier Press, Carmel, CA).


Children are safest where there are neighborhood adults with ‘eyes on the streets’ that watch over them, as in many densely-packed European cities with their public squares. Children are also safer where streets are designed and neighborhoods zoned to allow children to roam and explore, rather than be dependent on the auto to transport them to school, for instance, as is the case in many poorly-planned American suburbs.

Such concerns were incorporated into the City of Goleta—that made it such a close-knit, ‘liveable’ community, in my opinion. It was also why attending the Goleta Dam Dinner’s 10th anniversary was such a special event.

Harlan Green © 2019

 Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Thursday, April 4, 2019

ANSWERING THE KENNEDYS CALL: Birth of a 'Livable' City



It is extremely difficult to form a new city in California, or any other US State for that matter. The studies required to justify taking jurisdiction away from a county government really means taking it away from what is in essence state control, since county governments were originally set up under state jurisdictions, and controlled by state laws and regulations.

This is evidenced by the financial strings state and county governments hold over cities; mainly in terms of its planning and zoning regulations, but also the share of tax revenues to various local services, such water and sanitary districts.

The birth of a new city in the Goleta valley was a vision that took years to realize, and huge amount of patience and persistence to bring together a unique admixture of its citizens—from Mexican immigrants to hi tech engineers, to university-educated environmentalists, and Defense Department employees; from supporters that wanted more municipal improvements such as flood and highway improvements, to those that wanted it to remain a sleepy bedroom community serving the adjacent City of Santa Barbara.

Forming a brand new city was the most challenging example of community building I experienced in my life because it meant bringing together enough of its residents in a common vision of their community. Seasonal farm workers that harvested large lemon and avocado groves lived side-by-side with University of California Santa Barbara students and their professors in the unincorporated valley.

Because of this diversity there were an almost equal number for and against the formation of a new city. But it finally happened on the fourth try—February 1, 2002. The high crime rate in Goleta’s Old Town—the historical center of the Goleta Valley since it was settled more than 100 years earlier—was documented in the Redevelopment District Agency study commissioned by Santa Barbara County. There were more bars than restaurants and it was home to several gangs. There were also serious environmental concerns, as high traffic totals were causing air pollution, and successive floods during the 1990s following an earlier drought required greater flood controls.

Just the fact that it became a city enabled Goleta to contract with the County Sheriff to provide a neighborhood police service accountable solely to Goleta residents. This resulted in Goleta being listed as one of the 50 safest American cities in 2017, eleven years after its formation, according to a survey by Safewise, a security firm.

The re-design of Old Town Goleta also seemed an ideal location to practice some of those precepts of True Urbanism, or New Urban Design, all labels attached to what is now a worldwide movement that sought to make cities more citizen friendly.

How hard could that be, though we didn’t realize the state’s Environmental Quality Report (CEQA) would require flood improvements before anything else was done. We didn’t realize in a word what an effort it would take, and continuing struggle it still is, to bring together so much diversity of opinion and conviction into a well-functioning and sustainable community that epitomized what pro-city residents wanted in a new city.

First step was to organize a design conference to provide design and planning alternatives for the future—something county planners supported after three failed Goleta cityhood elections. It was obvious that without a community effort to create a town center with a unique identity that contrasted with neighboring Big Sister city Santa Barbara, Goleta’s cityhood might never succeed.

The American Institute of Architects was co-sponsoring eight simultaneous design charrettes across the country and in Hawaii at the time, in an attempt to create design outcomes using these new urban planning techniques. All were retreats that brought design professionals such as architects, designers, and urban planners together to envision and help to re-design a project area—such as a district or town center.

The Goleta Old Town design charrette, a French term for a gathering of designers and interested parties to create an innovative atmosphere in which a diverse group of stakeholders can collaborate to "generate visions for the future" to use Wikipedia’s description, was also hooked via Internet to the seven other design charrettes so we could share ideas and outcomes. All were weekend-long marathon sessions that began early and went late into each evening of those two days, creating a feverish intensity that only an assembly of very creative individuals can foment.

The idea of a design charrette was exciting in itself. It is a well-known architectural concept first adopted by students of Paris’s Ecole des Beaux Arts, Frances’s major design school, in the 1800s. They were used to cramming for exams at the last minute while riding in a charrette, or horse cart to the exams. So this was an exciting chance for local students, environmentalists, and some developers that wanted to participate in what Goleta might become for future generations.

These retreats were co-sponsored by the American Institute of Architects, or AIA, and included Honolulu and Charlottesville, Virginia, home of the Jefferson designed University of Virginia and Jefferson’s nearby Monticello home, of course. I remember Charlottesville was surrounded by a rusting industrial belt needing resuscitation that could benefit from mixed-use design concepts of the new urban planning, just as Old Town was surrounded by auto-dependent suburban malls and shopping centers with few pedestrian conveniences.

We were able to assemble 100 design professionals and civic activists such as myself. It was a vehicle to begin the process of envisioning, or re-visioning a future for Old Town and the Goleta valley community.

We basically locked ourselves into a large industrial building and broke into eight committees, each tasked to come up with a different design concept for that weekend. The eight results covered the gamut of ideas for Old Town, an area of no more than 20 city blocks and population of ­­­­5,000. The designs ranged from a totally pedestrian environment only accessible to public transportation with room for pedestrian-oriented businesses and entertainment to draw them out of their autos, to one that permitted automobile access, (which local small businesses badly wanted to sustain their small businesses), but with more off street parking and lots of green landscaping.

Margaret Connell, a recent Goleta city council member who supported the Old Town revitalization plan and wanted Old Town to be part of a new city center, voiced some of her concerns because much of the work has remained undone since cityhood: “…So Goleta Old Town feels more embedded than the more recent housing and worksites, and it also suffers from some disadvantages of being “old.” It lacks sidewalks through much of the older residential areas, though the city is taking steps to remedy this. There are many children who live here, but there are very few parks — a pocket park on Nectarine, a larger one on Armitos Avenue, and a four-acre, active-recreation park on Kellogg Street, which is still being developed,” said former council woman Connell.

The major environmental concerns were a lack of alternative transportation (such as busses and bike lanes) to manage traffic flow during peak rush hour that could still service Old Town residents and businesses. Flooding was also a major concern, in spite of periodic droughts, since Santa Barbara and the south coast had suffered several devastating floods during the 1990’s that ended a prior eight-year drought.

The flood that broke the 1993 drought was called the March miracle because 11 inches of rain fell that month, even closing the Santa Barbara Municipal Airport for several days that had been formed from a saltwater estuary.

Old Town’s main street was flooded as well one night with at least a foot of water from a torrential rainfall that overflowed the two creeks bracketing Old Town’s boundaries. That is why flood control improvements, such as an enlarged and channelized creek bed, were required in the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) report as the first step in any redevelopment effort.

The droughts and consequential flooding also made everyone aware of the limited water supplies in California, even though some areas that year had experienced the greatest rainfall totals since the 1880s.

This is why the work of the new city of Goleta has just begun. The community plan balances environmental with livable concerns, but there was a casualty of the 2007-2009 Great Recession that caused an unexpected disruption of Goleta’s future infrastructure upgrades; especially in Old Town, which is adjacent to Santa Barbara’s municipal airport with its own accessibility problems.

California, to solve its budget problems from the Great Recession, dissolved all 404 Redevelopment District Agencies in 2011, which removed the tax financing that Old Town was counting on to fix some of those transportation problems and relieve the traffic congestion. That has put many of the planned improvements on hold until alternative financing is found.

So has Goleta become a more livable city? Its residents think so, though affordable housing will always be a problem. Local Historian Walker Thompkins’ description of the Goleta valley as a pastoral paradise is immortalized in his book, Goleta, the Good Land that is still available on Amazon’s website.

The livable cities movement, which is what it has become as cities now compete to attract the best and the brightest people and best jobs, has evolved into a ranking contest. The annual rankings of the most livable cities are published by several well-known lifestyle publications and organizations, including the AARP Livability Index, Monocle's "Most Liveable Cities Index", the Economist Intelligence Unit's "Global Liveability Ranking", and "Mercer Quality of Living Survey". 

Unfortunately, not a single US city on the Economist’s list makes the top 10 in a study of the world’s 140 major cities. Melbourne, Australia topped it in 2016, with Perth and Adelaide Australia also in the top ten. Honolulu, Hawaii is the only American city mentioned at all. It makes the top ten list of most improved cities over the past 5 years.

Is their bias showing? A ranking released by the Economist Intelligence Unit, attempts to quantify the world’s most “livable” cities—that is, which locations around the world provide the best or the worst living conditions. The index, measured out of 100, considers 30 factors related to safety, health care, educational resources, infrastructure and the environment to calculate scores for 140 cities.

“Those that score best tend to be mid-sized cities in wealthier countries,” said the Economist survey. “Melbourne tops the list for the sixth year in a row, and six of the top ten cities are in Australia or Canada. But Sydney, Australia’s largest city, drops out of the top ten due to fears over terrorism.”

So the safety of its residents and the threat of violence and terrorism seems to have knocked American cities off the list, and put Australia at the top of most livable cities rankings. How do we solve the increasing dangers from violent extremism and domestic violence that make so many American and European cities unsafe?

Goleta's Old Town revitalization is still a work in progress, in other words. Goleta became a city in 2002, but is still wrestling with the idea of putting a new City Hall in Old Town rather than continue to rent space in an industrial complex farther to the west in the midst of malls and office complexes. It remains to be seen just what the new city of Goleta will look like 15 years after its formation, and whether it is able to embody the livable planning principles we envisioned in the design charrette.

And what are other institutions that might bring us more peace and freedom in the world with its droughts, mass migrations, inequality and civil unrest in so many countries? How can we nurture more viable communities and neighborhoods? There are modern social movements and community development tools that can bring this about. We will describe some of them in the next chapters.

Harlan Green © 2019

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen