Showing posts with label behavioral economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label behavioral economics. Show all posts

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Top Economics Blog: http://PopularEconomics.com




BusinessEconomics.com 2016 Award Winner: Top Economics Blog PopularEconomics.com

http://www.businesseconomics.com/business-economics-award-winners-2016.html

In determining the awards we received recommendations for 6,856 sites from 57,204 people who voted on our site. When we determined the sites that should be given the awards, we looked at the quality of content, usability, timeliness of content and the extent to which much of the content is accessible to all web users. We are delighted that your website met all of these criteria and was judged to provide an excellent service to internet users.

Many congratulations on being awarded the BusinessEconomics.com award for 2016 as detailed above. This year BusinessEconomics.com has given out three awards in each of the following 37 categories of Business, Economics and Finance sites making 111 awards in total.

1) Top Financial news sites
2) Top Economics news sites
3) Top Business news sites
4) Top Economics blogs
5) Top Finance blogs
6) Top  Business blogs
7) Top MBA sites
8) Top Economics Education sites
9) Top Finance Education sites
10) Top Business Education sites
11) Top Stocks sites
12) Top Bonds sites
13) Top  Foreign Exchange sites
14) Top Commodities sites
15) Top Futures sites
16) Top Options sites
17) Top Emerging Markets sites
18) Top Commercial Banking sites
19) Top investment Banking sites
20) Top Mutual Fund sites
21) Top Insurance sites
22) Top Mergers and Acquisitions sites
23) Top Exchange Traded Fund sites
24) Top Sovereign Wealth Fund sites
25) Top Hedge Fund sites
26) Top Private Equity sites
27) Top Islamic Finance sites
28) Top Economics data sites
29) Top Business data sites
30) Top Finance Data sites
31) Top Economics Research sites
32) Top Finance Research sites
33) Top Business Research sites
34) Top Economics job sites
35) Top Finance job sites
36) Top Business job sites
37) Top Personal Finance sites

BusinessEconomics.com specializes in providing students, University lecturers and professionals working in the areas of Business, Economics and Finance with links and reviews of high quality websites that they may find useful in their academic and professional lives. The site and the resources to fund this year’s awards is provided by advertising revenue and some sponsorship of our pages, the details of which are contained in the link below.

Again many congratulations on your award. We feel it is important that websites that provide an excellent user experience, with good educational value and information are recognised. This is the third year of the awards which are already established as the most important in the Business, Economics and Finance categories.

Best wishes
Keith Pilbeam
www.BusinessEconomics.com

Monday, October 14, 2013

Econ Robert Shiller’s Nobel Prize a Big Win

Popular Economics Weekly

Although much of what Yale economist Robert Shiller writes is about the importance of financial markets, he won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for studying how financial markets misbehave. He is a pioneer in the new field of Behavioral Economics, or behavioral finance, as he has sometimes calls it.

“Mr. Shiller, 67, later introduced an important caveat to the idea that markets operate efficiently, finding that stock and bond prices show greater predictability over longer periods,” said the New York Times, in commenting on the award to Dr. Shiller, Eugene Fama, and Lars Peter Hansen. “Mr. Shiller and other economists see evidence that these movements cannot be entirely explained by rational decision-making, and instead reflect the irrational behavior of market participants.”

His recognition will ultimately swing the pendulum of economic thought away from the so-called Austrian school of free market economics that conservatives have long worshipped to justify their belief that small government and little taxes were the most “efficient” way to distribute wealth. We know the result of those theories—Inequality For All, to paraphrase Robert Reich’s latest book and film now in theatres.

He also boosted Keynesian economics with Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, written with Nobelist George A. Akerlof in 2009, which documented how financial behavior is tied to the vagaries of human nature, a clear tribute to John Maynard Keynes and his theory of animal spirits—today termed a greater or lesser confidence in an unknown future.

His biggest claim to fame comes from his 2000 book, since revised, Irrational Exuberance, which predicted the dot-com bubble bust. In it he looked at the empirical behavior of stock prices over the past 100 years. It showed that S&P price-to-earnings ratios had soared to unsustainable levels—as much as 44 to 1, almost double that of the Black Monday stock market collapse at the beginning of the Great Depression.

“The high recent valuations in the stock market,” said Shiller in Irrational Exuberance, “have come about for no good reasons. The market level does not, as so many imagine, represent the consensus judgment of experts who have carefully weighed the long-term evidence. The market is high because of the combined effect of indifferent thinking by millions of people, very few of whom feel the need to perform careful research on the long-term investment value of the aggregate stock market, and who are motivated substantially by their own emotions, random attentions, and perceptions of conventional wisdom.”

He also specialized in real estate and wrote books such as The Subprime Solution: How Today's Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to Do about It, and with Karl Case set up the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index that tracks national same-home sale prices for 10 and 20 metropolitan districts.

But I predict that he will become known for an even greater contribution to economic thought. It is for his book, The New Financial Order, Risk in the 21st Century, Princeton U. Press (2003). In it, he uses his empirical knowledge and Big Data to tell us how to create hedging and insurance mechanisms that protect against major risks that have pummeled the financial markets.

“…the insights of finance have been applied in only a limited way,” says Professor Shiller in his introduction. “Finance has substantially neglected the protections of our ordinary riches, our careers, our homes, and our very abilities to be creative as professionals. We need to democratize finance and bring the advantages enjoyed by the clients of Wall Street to the customers of Wal-Mart”.

And that will continue to be is his real contribution to a world where equality is good for everyone. Understanding how markets misbehave will rip the shroud away from those who have been able to profit from the public’s lack of knowledge about how financial markets actually perform.

Harlan Green © 2013

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Housing Is Definitely Recovering

The Mortgage Corner

In spite of warnings from such as Robert Shiller of Irrational Exuberance fame that housing values could remain stagnant over the next ten years, housing prices are making a comeback, which is boosting economic growth. Some of the worst hit bubble cities have the largest price increases, and diminished inventories. Even better news is that housing prices have returned to historical levels as measured by the price-to-rent ratio, which measures the relationship between rents (which are closely tied to incomes) and housing values, signaling that housing values are no longer in bubble territory.

clip_image002

Graph: Calculated Risk

Data through February 2013, released today by S&P Dow Jones Indices for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices ... showed average home prices increased 8.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively, for the 10- and 20-City Composites in the 12 months ending in February 2013, said the press release.

“Home prices continue to show solid increases across all 20 cities,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The 10- and 20-City Composites recorded their highest annual growth rates since May 2006; seasonally adjusted monthly data show all 20 cities saw higher prices for two months in a row – the last time that happened was in early 2005. Home sales aren’t doing badly either.”

For instance, we can say that housing prices in California cities, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego have recovered more than half their values lost since 2000. And the Price-to-Rent ratio is back to 1 to 1, meaning that the historical ratio held since January 1983 is probably the best indicator that prices have now stabilized for the longer term.

clip_image004

Graph: Calculated Risk

Some economists, including Dr. Shiller, seem to be puzzled by the price surge, in particular. But what about the return to more than 1 million plus new households being formed in 2012—a tripling of the recession lows, when children fled back to their parents homes because of the hard times?

And we mustn’t forget that employment has improved substantially, with some 6 million jobs now added to payrolls since the Great Recession. Dr. Shiller’s latest conclusions are based on surveys and his theories that much of consumer behavior comes from hearsay and not much research into investments, hence the housing bubble.

Dr. Shiller, an Economics Professor at Yale University, also says the biggest home price increases now are seen in multifamily rather than single-family homes which reflects a shift from home ownership to renting. The buyers are investors who rent their properties, in other words.

“Most of the increase in households in this country has been met by an increase in renting,” says Shiller. “My own survey data with Chip Case confirms that people feel more positive about renting.” He suggests that those investing in real estate are buying homes most suitable to convert to rentals, which means price increases will be more closely tied to rent increases, which means closely tied to inflation. Hence he is intimating the price-to-rent ratio should remain stable around its historical 1 to 1 ratio for years to come, which means housing prices won’t rise faster than rents.

But whether rental or primary residences, housing is contributing to overall economic growth. The First Quarter contribution by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis shows that housing contributes more than 2 percent of GDP growth, and is on the upswing, particularly in single-family construction. Home improvements and broker commissions provide slightly less, while office and shopping mall investment provides contribute little at present, due to the high vacancy rates still prevailing, an overhang from the Great Recession.

Needless to say, construction spending means greater construction employment, and spending has been surging. Construction outlays rebounded 1.2 percent in February after dropping 2.1 percent in January. Private residential construction jumped 2.2 percent. For the latest month, the new one-family component was particularly strong, gaining 4.3 percent, following a 3.6 percent boost in January. The new multifamily component fell back 2.2 percent but followed a robust 6.1 percent jump the prior month. Public construction gained 0.9 percent, following a 0.2 percent rise in January. On a year-ago basis, overall construction was up 7.9 percent in February compared to 6.1 percent in January.

clip_image006

Graph: Econoday

Single-family investments is about to surpass home improvement outlays, says the BEA, with multifamily outlays still a minor component. So will Americans give up their home-ownership dream, and become a nation of renters? In fact, the current 64 percent home ownership rate is the long term ownership rate, which is one more factor that should tell us the housing bubble mentality Dr. Shiller so warns against has been deflated.

Harlan Green © 2013

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Sunday, May 16, 2010

No More ‘Double-Dip’ Talk

Popular Economics Weekly

“Irrational Exuberance” author Robert Shiller in an eye-opening Sunday NYTimes op-ed maintains there is still chance of a double-dip recession. But it could happen over years, rather than months. “I use the definition of a double-dip recession that doesn’t emphasize the short term,” he says. “I see it as beginning with a recession in which unemployment rises to a high level and then falls at a disappointingly slow rate.”

The problem with such a definition is that only the Great Depression fits his description. The double-dip occurred in 1937, 4 years after the 1929-1933 depression, when most economists say President Roosevelt prematurely attempted to balance his budget! So is Professor Shiller guilty of his own irrational pessimism?

There is little likelihood of a double-dip for several reasons. Hiring is picking up in the wake of record corporate profits over the past 2 quarters, the huge amount of stimulus spending—some $3 trillion plus is just now taking effect and, confidence levels are not falling in spite of the current stock market correction.

clip_image002

Corporate profits in the fourth quarter surged to an annualized $1.270 trillion from $1.174 trillion the prior quarter, as we reported last week. Profits in the fourth quarter were up an annualized 37.0 percent, following a 68.0 percent jump the prior quarter. Profits are after tax but without inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments. Corporate profits are up 51.8 percent on a year-on-year basis.

This is the major reason stocks have recovered. The New York Times’ Paul Lim says there are rising expectations for corporate profits among Wall Street analysts (i.e., their ‘animal spirits’ are rising, not falling). So based on their 2010 earnings estimate, the ‘forward’ price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 has slipped to 13.7 percent from 15.3 percent less than one month ago. And Dr. Shiller maintains in his book, Irrational Exuberance, a price-to-earnings ratio of 13-14 percent increases the odds 15 percent that stock prices will increase rather than decrease.

It is true unemployment has remained high compared to past recessions, as we said last week. But payroll jobs in April grew a healthy 290,000, following a revised 230,000 advance in March, and 39,000 rise in February. And net combined revisions for March and February were up a 121,000—including turning February from negative to positive. Do we have to repeat the fact that payrolls have risen for four consecutive months and in five of the last six? April’s boost was the largest in four years, by the way.

clip_image004

It’s hard to argue that we are still in recession with this string of gains, as we have said, even though the gains are mostly on Wall Street to date, with corporate profits soaring. Of course consumers don’t yet feel they are sharing in it, which is the basis for Shiller’s pessimism.

“From 2007 to 2009, there was widespread concern about the risk of an economic depression, but that scare has been abating”, he continues. “Since mid-2009, it has been replaced by the milder worry of a double-dip recession, as a count of Web searches for those terms on Google Insights suggests. And with that depression scare still fresh in our minds, sensitivity to the possibility of another downturn remains high.”

The Conference Board's consumer confidence report rose strongly for a second straight month, up about 5-1/2 points in April to 57.9. The gain is centered in expectations which jumped 7 points to 77.4, reflecting rising optimism over the outlook for business conditions and easing pessimism on the outlook for employment and income.

clip_image006

The assessment of the present situation also improved with the index rising more than 3-1/2 points but to a still severely depressed level of 28.6, reports Econoday. Pessimism is easing with fewer describing current business conditions as bad and fewer describing jobs as hard to get (45.0 percent vs. March's 46.3 percent). Other details show a jump in buying plans for cars and major appliances though buying plans for homes are still under water. Inflation expectations, despite the month's rise in gasoline prices, eased slightly.

So the recovery is finally beginning for Main Street. I like Calculated Risk’s chart on this. According to the Labor Department’s JOLT report (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary), there were 4.242 million hires in March (Seasonally Adjusted), and 4.016 million total separations, or 226 thousand net jobs gained. Notice that total job separations have been dropping since January ‘09, while the number of both job openings and hires has been rising since mid-2009, the probable end of this recession.

clip_image008

So even though the unemployment rate is declining slowly, it is already a long term trend, folks. And though the median duration of unemployment rose to 21.6 weeks from 20.0 weeks in March and the percentage of unemployed, marginally attached and part time is still above 16 percent of the workforce, it is mainly because more people are optimistic about finding a job (805,000 actually rejoined the workforce in April).

It’s true that short-term attitudes can change on a dime, as the DOW’s 900 point drop proves. But the longer term trend of “public thinking”, as Shiller calls it, seems to be greater optimism rather than pessimism. Just look at comparisons to other post-WWII recessions done by Calculated risk. It shows that the two longest jobless recoveries were during Republican administrations—Bush I &II—which were ruled by an ideology that opposed government stimulus spending. The Obama Administration has taken the opposite attack—pump as much government stimulus as possible into the economy to speed up the recovery. And it seems to be working.

Harlan Green © 2010

Sunday, May 9, 2010

The Case for Sustainable Economics-II

Financial FAQs

Behavioral Economist Robert Shiller said in a recent New York Times Op-ed said, “We need to invent financial institutions that take into account the kinds of communities we want to build. And we need to base this innovation on an approach to economics that captures the richness of human experience—and not efficient-market economics.”

Dr. Shiller is one of many economists decrying the lack of sustainable financial institutions that have led to so many recessions, including the current Great Recession—sustainable institutions that build communities rather than destroy them. Their lack has been mainly because they targeted the wrong economic goals—productivity over sustainability, or efficient markets (i.e. markets with minimal oversight) over markets that attempt to sustain longer-term economic growth.

We seem to have mastered the means of production, as economist John Maynard Keynes predicted in his 1930 treatise, “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren”, yet not how to put such growth on a sustainable path that benefits future generations rather than indebting them. As the originator of an economic theory that advocated government support during the Great Depression, Keynes believed that markets did not cure themselves without widespread suffering. The “animal spirits” of a populace that was discouraged by prolonged unemployment had to be boosted by governmental job creation measures in order to boost economic growth, if private sector employers weren’t hiring.

In other words, most modern economic theory has concentrated on producing the maximum amount of goods and services (hence emphasis on efficient markets), but ignoring their social welfare aspects. I.e., how sustainable is such a system that venerates individual effort (i.e., self-interest), but ignores its results? When whole communities are destroyed by a succession of bursting asset bubbles—it was first the dot-com bubble in 2000, then real estate bubble, and now the credit bubble bursting that has almost destroyed our banking system—then it is time to begin looking for a more sustainable economic system that preserves assets for our grandchildren.

Economists, sociologists and psychologists in particular are beginning to look at systems that capture the “richness of human experience” advocated by Dr. Shiller. One pioneer is economist Hazel Henderson, who helped to found the Calvert family of eco-friendly mutual funds. She also created the Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators (at http://www.calvert-henderson.com) that helps to measure what makes up a better quality of life. Its education component highlights why U.S. elementary education has flagged—the U.S. is ninth in the list of eighth grade math and science scores, for instance—behind nos. 1 and 2 Singapore and Taiwan, and what should be done to remedy it.

The research of behavioral economists such as Dr. Shiller are also debunking the efficient markets’ economists who generally advocate privatization (and deregulation) of financial institutions in the belief that individuals are the best regulators of their own behavior. Behavioral economists find that most people either do not have the time or knowledge to make intelligent financial decisions without some regulation to govern errant behavior. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan once famously said,

“It is not that humans have become any greedier than in generations past. It is that the avenues to express greed had grown so enormously.”

Though private enterprise is the foundation of capitalism, and its source of wealth, we now know it only enriches the few without adequate regulation and governmental oversight.

And so Lord Keynes concludes, “The strenuous purposeful money-makers may carry all of us along with them into the lap of economic abundance. But it will be those peoples, who can keep alive, and cultivate into a fuller perfection, the art of life itself and do not sell themselves for the means of life, who will be able to enjoy the abundance when it comes.”