Showing posts with label Treasury yield curve. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Treasury yield curve. Show all posts

Monday, October 7, 2019

How Much Has US Economy Slowed?

Financial FAQs


It’s a difficult question to answer. The ISM’s non-manufacturing Indexes still show growth, which is two-thirds of economic activity, but we are close to that edge of no growth at all.
“The NMI® registered 52.6 percent, which is 3.8 percentage points below the August reading of 56.4 percent,” reports Anthony Nieves, Chair of the Institute for Supply Management. “This represents continued growth in the non-manufacturing sector, at a slower rate. The Non-Manufacturing Business Activity Index decreased to 55.2 percent, 6.3 percentage points lower than the August reading of 61.5 percent, reflecting growth for the 122nd consecutive month. The New Orders Index registered 53.7 percent; 6.6 percentage points lower than the reading of 60.3 percent in August. The Employment Index decreased 2.7 percentage points in September to 50.4 percent from the August reading of 53.1 percent. The respondents are mostly concerned about tariffs, labor resources and the direction of the economy,” said Nieves.
 We know the US economy is slowing, and the manufacturing activity is already contracting—the first of the four indicators that are used to call a recession—per the ISM’s Manufacturing Diffusion Index.


And last week’s Associated Data Processing survey came in at 135,000 jobs created, which is a slight downward trend. Just 8,000 jobs were added to the goods-producing sector, whereas 127,000 jobs were added to the service-providing sector, according to ADP.

ADP private payroll survey is usually within 50,000 of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly survey coming out tomorrow, which isn’t much help in predicting the BLS unemployment report.
So there you have it. Employment growth has leveled off. i.e., is no longer increasing. Tomorrow’s report may also show more weakness in job creation.

The 10-year Treasury yield also slipped back into the 1.5 percent range, a sign that there is little demand for credit. Interest rates this low are also a sign of pessimism about future growth, which can be self-fulfilling.

I believe our economy will continue to barely grow, and so avoid an outright recession; at least until next year’s presidential election, when the trade wars might or might not be finally resolved. That seems to be the consensus.

Harlan Green © 2019

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Friday, August 10, 2018

Why Aren't Wages Growing Faster?

Popular Economics Weekly

Graph: FRED

Interest rates are far too low for this late in the recovery from the Great Recession. We know this because the Treasury Yield Curve has been falling that measures the difference between the 10-year and 2-year Treasury bond yields. The difference is just 1 percent, when it has been around 2 percent during other prosperous times, as the FRED graph shows. It last was this low just before the last 2 recessions (gray columns in graph).

Why are interest rates still low? The simplest answer is there isn’t sufficient demand for what is being produced that would cause more borrowing, thus causing interest rates to rise. And though the Republican tax cuts have juiced profits of corporations and their stock holders, it hasn’t boosted the wages of ordinary consumers that power two-thirds of economic activity.

Consumers’ personal incomes are rising at the inflation rate on average, which means they don’t have sufficient income or savings that would cause them to increase their spending habits. It’s a difficult and maybe counter-intuitive concept. If prices are rising as fast as incomes, then consumers are also playing catchup in what they need to maintain their standard of living.

That is why economists worry that such low long term interest rates in particular could be a sign of another incipient recession. Banks cannot lend as much when their profit on loans is the difference between their cost of money and what they can lend at longer-term loan rates (such as mortgages and installment loans). So it means a shrinkage in the available credit.

The good news is that job openings are still soaring in the Labor Department’s JOLTS Report, which should boost wages. It is a survey of available jobs, vs. how many jobs have been created in June.
There were 6.662 million in June vs. an upwardly revised 6.659 million in May, reports the BLS.

Year-on-year, the number of job openings was up 8.8 percent. The number of hires remained well below job openings at 5.651 million in June, down from May's 5.747 million, while separations, which includes quits, layoffs and discharges, rose to 5.502 million from 5.419 million.
 

That means there were more than 1 million jobs that remained unfilled, which has to put more pressure on employers to boost wages. So will inflation behave enough to allow an increase in real wages, which should be rising above the rate of inflation this late in the recovery from the Great Recession?

That has been the problem since the 1970s, really. The Fed wants to keep inflation low, so it raises interest rates whenever there is a sign that workers’ wages are rising faster than inflation. But this puts a damper on consumer spending, which in turn keeps economic growth in the 2-3 percent range, which isn’t enough to either pay down personal or government debts.

And social security trustees calculate the $3 trillion social security trust fund will be depleted by 1934, which would mean taxes must be raised to maintain current benefits before then. Does anything believe Congress will allow said benefits to shrink, with voting seniors just daring them to cut their benefits?

It’s much easier for the Fed to allow inflation to rise above its 2 percent target range before raising their interest rates to allow faster wage growth, which in turn boosts tax revenues. The social security trustees use a mid-range GDP growth rate of approximately 2.6 percent to calculate longevity of the SS trust fund.

GDP growth has averaged 3.5 percent since the 1930s, including the Great Depression. Why have inflation hawks at the Federal Reserve so slowed growth since the 1970s by boosting interest rates at the slightest hint of higher inflation, which in turn has kept GDP growth below its long-range potential?

The real answer is that pro-business, pro-corporate administrations since 1980 have severely limited collective bargaining and other pro-labor laws in the name of globalization, thus limiting wage growth.

That’s why such policies are called trickle-down economics. Very little of the national wealth created since then has trickled down to the 80 percent that are the real wage earners.

Harlan Green © 2018


Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

The Dangerous Treasury Yield Curve

Popular Economics Weekly

New Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has maintained that the Fed is on track to raise their short term interest rates at least 3 times this year. Why? It sees higher inflation down the road because of the huge federal budget deficit, and growing federal debt that now totals more than $20 trillion, combined with declining tax revenues due to the recent tax cuts.


But that’s not the real danger to continued growth, according to a new report by the San Francisco Fed. It is the danger than short-term interest rates may rise above long term bond rates, which would be what is called an inverted yield curve. And an inverted yield curve has correctly signaled all nine recessions, with only one false positive in the 1960s, says the SF Fed.

When short-term rates exceed long-term rates, the banks’ cost of money exceeds what they can earn, which makes it less profitable for them to lend. This can choke off available credit. The above graph shows the last 3 recessions when the yield curve was negative—in 1991, 2001, and 2007.

I maintain the inverted curve is not the only reason for the coincident recessions. It has as much to do with why long term Treasury bond rates are still so low in the ninth year of this economic recovery; the 10-year bond yield is still below 3 percent.

Rates are still low because there isn’t enough aggregate demand for the $trillions in excess cash being held by corporations, the Fed, and banks. That is to say, it’s not being used for investment purposes by the private or public sectors, or returned to the employees of those businesses. Instead, it’s being hoarded or used to buy back the shares of private businesses, which inflates stock prices but doesn’t increase the demand for their goods and services.  And government spending has been in a austerity mode since Republicans took over the US House of Representatives in 2010.

Boosting aggregate salaries of their employees would boost demand.  The incomes of wage and salary earners aren’t even keeping up with their spending, which is why the personal savings rate is just 3.2 percent, when it should be at least double at this stage of an economic recovery.

Macroeconomists look at aggregate demand to predict economic growth, which is the sum of activity in the private and public sectors. And they see weak demand, because average household incomes haven’t risen faster than inflation over the past 30 years, and government isn't upgrading our aging infrastructure, education system, R&Development--all necessary to boost productivity.

Average real household incomes have literally not grown at all when inflation is factored in as I said last week. This has been happening since the 1980s when trickle-down economics came into vogue, which said that the owners of capital and industry should receive the lion’s share of national income (via lower taxes and regulations), and that would create more jobs and growth for everyone.

So beware of another inverted yield curve, if the Fed continues to raise their rates as predicted. And stock traders know that. Hence the extreme price volatility of late. They see the same shrinking credit and declining growth picture, if long term bond rates don’t begin to rise soon.

But that won’t happen unless corporations and our government actually begin to spend their monies on productive uses, not tax cuts and share buybacks.

Harlan Green © 2018

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Financial FAQs

The Bureau of Labor Statistic’s JOLTS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey out Tuesday showed a huge boost in hiring and shrinkage of available jobs. What to make of it with almost nonexistent inflation, and the Fed’s Janet Yellen still making noises about raising interest rates?

Job openings fell back 5.0 percent to 5.666 million in May from 6 million, and hiring shot up 8.3 percent at 5.472 million from 5 million in April. So the number of net new job openings shrank from 1 million to a mere 194,000, while more than 400,000 new jobs were created! This is big news, and sets a record for this series while the number of job openings are the second lowest of the year.

Meanwhile, Janet Yellen can’t seem to make up her mind on the direction of economic growth in her latest congressional testimony. So she won’t commit to further rate hikes at the moment, which without growing inflation would slow growth, rather than be a sign of inflation (and growth) ahead.
“As I’ve said on many occasions, the new normal with respect to what level of interest rates is neutral appears to be rather low, so we have raised the federal-funds rate target. I believe policy remains accommodative.”
In what is one of the very weakest 4-month stretch in 60 years of records, says the Census Bureau, core consumer prices could manage only a 0.1 percent increase in June. This is the third straight 0.1 percent showing for the core (ex food & energy) that was preceded by the very rare 0.1 percent decline in March. Total prices were unchanged in the month with food neutral and energy down 1.6 percent.


The JOLTS report looks like employers’ job openings are finally catching up with their hiring. Other movement in this report is a 1 tenth rise in the quits rate to 2.2 percent which hints perhaps at worker confidence and willingness to switch jobs which may be a positive for wage.

Such a strong jobs report should mean wages are about to rise. At least the Fed believes so, but it ain’t yet happening, no matter what Dr. Yellen says. Wages have been at 2.5 percent over the past 2 years; just enough to pay current bills, but not to boost retail sales, a major component consumer spending, hence GDP growth.

Retail sales fell an unexpected 0.2 percent in June. This follows a revised 0.1 percent decline in May and a revised 0.3 percent gain for April which proved to be the quarter's only respectable showing.
Econoday says it “…shows wide weakness with vehicle sales coming in with a marginal 0.1 percent increase, the same for furniture and also electronics & appliances. Declines include food & beverage stores, down a sharp 0.4 percent, and department stores down 0.7 percent following the prior month's 0.8 percent plunge.”
So where is the inflation? Economic growth is still weak because demand is weak and maybe declining. This is worrisome.

Today’s CPI retail inflation report should convince Dr. Yellen that no further Fed rate hikes are warranted. Annual inflation has increased just 1.6 percent; 1.7 percent without volatile food and energy prices. And we have June’s unemployment report with 222,000 new payroll jobs, another sign of full employment. (It is seasonally adjusted, which is why it differs from the JOLTS numbers.)

Then there is the fact that interest rates aren't rising.  The 10-year Treasury yield is still at 2.26 percent, which would normally signal an incoming recession.  Let us hope not, since there are still jobs available and we have to first see wages rising!

Harlan Green © 2017


Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Thursday, May 11, 2017

The Declining Treasury Yield Curve—Recession Looming?

Financial FAQs

We are basically at full employment with a 4.4 percent unemployment rate, which should tell us we are nearing the end of this growth cycle.
Econoday reports, “The total number of employed Americans, and this includes both the self-employed and those on payrolls, is 153.2 million and a new record. This total has been rising steadily since falling to a cycle low in December 2009 of 138.0 million. Doing the math here means that 15.2 million jobs have been added during this expansion. The upward slope has been steady and is showing no sign of letting up. The peak in the prior cycle was 146.7 million, hit in November 2007.”



So how do we know we have reached a peak in growth? The National Bureau of Economic Research that tracks growth cycles tells us by using 4 economic indicators: including unemployment, real personal income and real GDP growth (less inflation), and industrial production. Those indicators have already surpassed their last peaks that were reached in 2007, so the question is how much higher can they go before they reach this cycle’s peak.

It is possible the economy may continue to grow with Congress and the White House politically deadlocked and unable to pass any stimulus spending, but that would mean the private sector starts spending more of their $4 trillion plus in unspent profits they have been hoarding, rather than wait for the tax cuts that Republicans have been promising. But don’t bet on that bridge to nowhere, as the saying goes.

On the NBER’s faq page, they define the beginning and end of recessions. “We identify a month when the economy reached a peak of activity and a later month when the economy reached a trough.
The time in between is a recession, a period when economic activity is contracting. The following period is an expansion. As of September 2010, when we decided that a trough had occurred in June 2009, the economy was still weak, with lingering high unemployment, but had expanded considerably from its trough 15 months earlier.”

So June 2009 was identified as the end of the Great Recession (the trough in activity), which began in December 2007 (its prior peak). Calculated Risk’s Bill McBride has followed those NBER recession indicators, and as of April, 2015, they have all exceeded their past highs.

I believe the most important indicator has been personal income, which exceeded its past peak in 2012, but has fluctuated a bit since then.


Employment is also important, but has tended to lag the other indicators in predicting a recession. It didn’t peak until several months into the Great Recession, but is now 2 percent above its last peak.

All four recession indicators are now above their pre-recession peaks. The problem now is we and the NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee aren’t sure that economic activity tops out until months later when the NBER sees a sustained drop in activity, as their 2010 example showed. This past quarter’s meager 0.7 percent GDP growth is still growth, by the way.

So another indicator that might indicate a looming slowdown is the decline in slope of the so-called Treasury Yield Curve, which shows the difference between short term rates regulated by the Federal Reserve, and long term fixed Treasury yields determined by the bond markets—such as the 10 and 30-year Treasuries.

The difference between those 2 yields is basically the profit margin made by lenders that have to borrow at short term rates and lend at the longer term interest rates. It is no longer as steep as it has been, which means lenders become more restrictive, which shrinks available credit, always a sign of slower growth.

So, if the Fed continues to raise short term rates, and because of market uncertainty or low inflation long term rates don't rise from their lows, then it could mean a looming recession.  But that is a big 'if'.

Harlan Green © 2017

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Saturday, April 25, 2015

March New-Home Sales A Dud

"Sales of new single-family houses in March 2015 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 481,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 11.4 percent below the revised February rate of 543,000, but is 19.4 percent above the March 2014 estimate of 403,000."

image

Graph: Calculated Risk

The March result was a disappointment, mainly in the south, where sales fell 15.8 percent. And because builders continue to build—housing starts are close to the million unit mark again—housing inventories are rising and prices are falling. The supply of new homes rose to 5.3 months, while the median price fell to 1.5 percent to $277,400. Year-on-year, the median price to down 1.7 percent while sales are up 19.4 percent, a discrepancy that points to price discounting by builders, says Calculated Risk.

What is behind the up and down gyration in sales? Winter is still with us, for one thing. And many of the southern and Midwest states are being pounded by tornadoes, as well as torrential rains. Lower oil prices could also be hurting an area heavily dependent on the oil and gas industries.

We will know next week if job creation will resume from February’s low numbers, and so consumer confidence remains high. Mortgage activity is high, highest level in years, what with interest rates still at record lows. (The 10-year Treasury yield is back down to 1.91 percent, and Eurozone bonds now have negative interest rates, meaning banks have to pay their clients to borrow money, because there is so little demand for loans.)

Mortgage applications increased 2.3 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association's (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending April 17, 2015.  The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 2.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 5 percent from one week earlier to its highest level since June 2013.  The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 6 percent compared with the previous week and was 16 percent higher than the same week one year ago.

"Purchase applications increased for the fourth time in five weeks as we proceed further into the spring home buying season. Despite mortgage rates below four percent, refinance activity increased less than one percent from the previous week," said Mike Fratantoni, MBA's Chief Economist.  

The fact that purchase mortgage applications now comprise 44 percent of all applications, the highest in years, as we said, means the Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates as low as possible until household incomes begin to rise again is the right policy to kick start the housing market, and bring in those first time homebuyers who have been renting until know.

It also means some overbuilding of new homes is necessary to build up housing inventories for sale, and thus keep home prices in the affordable range.

Harlan Green © 2015

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Why Low Interest Rates Are Here to Stay

Financial FAQs

Some have called it a Putin bond rally. Or it might be new Fed Chairperson Yellen’s determination to keep interest rates as low as possible, until economic prosperity returns to Main Street. It might as well be because our employment rate is still above 6 percent, with many millions of the long term unemployed out of work.

In fact, for all of these reasons, interest rates are returning to their Great Recession lows. This will certainly boost housing sales and prices, as it has for motor vehicle sales, as well as shorter-term borrowing that small businesses need, in particular.

For instance, the 30-year fixed conforming mortgage rate has dropped to 3.875 percent with a 1 point origination fee for some lenders in California. The US 10-year Treasury bond yield is back down to 2.61 percent as of this writing, and Italy and Spain’s 10-year bond yields have dropped below 3 percent for the first time since their recessions.

S&P

Graph: S&P

One can see from the accompanying chart that rates are at historic lows, as low as the wartime 1940s. Why such low rates? The latest rate downturn is probably because of a flight to quality by jittery investors, that see bonds as the safer investment during such uncertain times. It happened with Putin’s invasion of Eastern Ukraine and the US and European threat of serious sanctions that could bring an already weak Russian economy to a period of severe deprivation.

The 18-member Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) just reported that 2014 Russian economic growth has probably slowed to 0.5 percent from its earlier forecast of 2.8 percent growth, in spite of Russia’s tremendous oil and gas reserves.

"The moderate recovery that was under way at the end of 2013 has been halted by the turbulence related to the events in Ukraine," said the OECD. "Associated increased uncertainties and capital flight are now weighing on investor confidence. Consumption growth will weaken as real income growth slows and consumer credit becomes more expensive."

And the OECD doesn’t see worldwide economic growth picking up anytime soon. It’s almost a truism that uncertain times mean hoarding of monies. US corporations are hoarding some $2 to $3 trillion in liquid assets, depending on whom you ask, banks more than $1 trillion in excess reserves. That means they see no markets to invest their record profits, and so would rather pay their executives excessive salaries and shareholders higher dividends.

PCE

Graph: Econoday

Another reason for such low interest rates is of course the low inflation rate, which affects interest rates even more directly. This is because bond interest rates are usually fixed (except for the Treasury’s inflation-indexed bonds), so any increase in the inflation rate reduces the value of their bonds.

The Personal Consumption Expenditures Index has been below 2 percent since the end of the Great Recession, except for a period in 2011 when expectations of growth were higher. It is now just 1.1 percent, which is what enables the Fed to keep their short term rates so low.

And lastly, Q1 2014 GDP growth came in at just 0.1 percent, with some pundits predicting it could become negative with the next revision. All this is certainly enough to keep both short and long term interest rates low for a long time.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Why the Terrible Payroll Report?

The Labor Department’s (BLS) August unemployment report showing ZERO (0) nonfarm payrolls growth was a shocker, when seasonally adjusted. Though expectations were low, no one had predicted absolutely no increase in hiring. But wait a minute. Aren’t 4 million jobs created and 4 million jobs lost on average every month, according to the Labor Department?

Ah, there’s the rub. When Labor “seasonally adjusts” the jobs’ numbers it is really counting any increase or decrease over normal hiring for that season, as we’ve said in past columns. For instance, during the summer months, since it finds a seasonal increase of approx. 1 million jobs from youths entering the labor force, it subtracts that 1 million from any actual increase in hiring before calculating the final Household survey increase or decrease via algorithmic formulas. This is while Establishment survey of nonfarm payrolls seasonal adjustment actually added jobs in August, as education payrolls can decline as much as 20 percent during the summer months, necessitating adding a seasonal adjustment factor.

clip_image002

We see more with JOLTS, the July BLS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (It lags by one month), which shows the actual job totals. The number of job openings surprised us by climbing to a new cyclical high of 3.228 million positions, and the quit rate was a little higher than expected with 1.95 million workers voluntarily leaving their jobs for other opportunities. However, the number of new hires in the month slipped back to a six month low of 3.984 million, suggesting slightly less dynamism in recent months, said Wrightson ICAP. So employment numbers are at best an estimation, and can be the elephant in the room when attempting to predict future economic activity. In fact, the BLS itself says that it can only be 90 percent to get within 100,000 of the real numbers!

clip_image004

Chart: Wrightson ICAP

Since the seasonal adjustment is never very accurate it keeps getting adjusted when the more accurate state initial unemployment insurance claims come in. For instance, July’s payrolls were adjusted downward from 117,000 to 85,000, and June dropped from 46,000 to 20,000 net nonfarm payroll jobs. And Barron’s economist Gene Epstein mentions that as many as 75,000 private payrolls jobs might have been lost by the (just settled) Verizon strike in August.

And both the service and manufacturing sectors are showing more strength in August. An unexpected one-point increase in orders contributed to an unexpected rebound in the ISM non-manufacturing survey. The 0.6 increase to 53.3 was small but surprising nonetheless. The employment index fell by less than one point to 51.6, which, over time would be consistent with somewhat stronger payroll growth than was reported on Friday.

clip_image006

Chart: Wrightson ICAP

The overall business activity index, which is the most subjective component, slipped just half a point to 55.6. That index remains a couple of points above the recent lows reached in the April-June period, and suggests that the non-manufacturing sector does not see signs of an imminent collapse.

Another indicator arguing against a double dip is the Chicago Purchasing Managers Index. Business in the Chicago area this month did not slow as much as expected with the purchasers' index coming in at 56.5, down only 2.3 points from July. August's rate is comfortably over 50 to indicate solid growth in the area's economy though at a slightly slower rate than July. Chicago's sample, which includes both non-manufacturing and manufacturing firms, is considered a good proxy for overall GDP growth.

clip_image008

Econoday reports it shows solid but slowing growth for new orders and production. The new orders index rose to 56.9, compared to 59.4 in July. Production came in at 57.8, down from 64.3 in July but well over breakeven. Supplier deliveries slower substantially which is a sign of strong business activity. These results were surprisingly solid given the run of negative indications on August business conditions that included extremely weak readings on consumer spirits and a run of regional manufacturing reports reporting contraction.

Why aren’t more jobs being created? Corporations with a $2 trillion cash hoard and record profits aren’t the problem. They would hire more if they could sell more. So additional demand has to be created by financing additional projects that create private jobs, like rebuilding our aging infrastructure. The American Society of Civil Engineers has calculated that the deferred maintenance of our public transportation system alone will cost $2 trillion to bring up to modern standards.

clip_image010

Inflation also isn’t the problem. The 10-year Treasury bond yield is now under 2 percent. And Nobelist Paul Krugman said recently there are only 2 numbers that tell us what we have to do to grow the economy. The record low yield of the 10-year Treasury Bond, and 0 net nonfarm payroll growth in August. So the problem at the moment is the lack of political will in Congress to create more jobs, not the private sector who would certainly hire more workers if they had work for them.

Harlan Green © 2011

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

When is Inflation a Problem?

Financial FAQs

Does it seem like the price of everything is rising these days—particularly food and gas prices? It really depends on who you talk to, and this is reviving the age-old debate between deficit hawks and doves. The old saw that inflation is first and foremost a monetary phenomenon was coined in the 1950s. Thank you, Milton Friedman, for the most simplistic formula ever to come out of academia.

Of course, he meant that inflation depended on the amount of money in circulation vs. the amount of goods available to purchase—the most basic Law of Supply and Demand. Wars tend to be more inflationary, because employment is high while much of production is tied up in making guns instead of butter. During recessions such as we just experienced, on the other hand, there is a surplus of goods and deficit of money in circulation. Fewer people are working, in other words, so they can’t buy as much.

And right now we are in a disinflationary trend—which means prices are falling, but there is still some inflation—vs. outright deflation such as Japan is still experiencing, where wages and prices are actually shrinking.

clip_image002

What is making the deficit hawks nervous is that headline inflation—i.e., overall inflation including food and energy prices—has been steadily rising since July, 2010. This is using the Personal Consumption Expenditure price index, which is the best overall measure of domestic prices. But the core rate without food and energy prices hasn’t budged. Why? Because consumers aren’t buying enough of the products and services affected by food and energy prices—such as motor vehicles (though demand for vehicles is rising).

clip_image004

Therefore, the overall inflation trend is still downward. The core rate came in unchanged after edging up 0.1 percent in November. On a year-ago basis, headline PCE prices are up 1.2 percent, compared to 1.1 percent in November. Core inflation eased to 0.7 percent year-on-year versus 0.8 percent in November.

clip_image006

What is happening to interest rates? Longer term rates are rising in tandem with the rising loan demand from consumers and businesses, as evidenced by the Treasury Yield Curve. Employment is picking up, in other words. Approximately 1 million jobs were created last year, of the more than 8 million jobs lost during the recession, and the unemployment rate has dropped to 9 percent from its 9.8 percent high.  But short term rates that control the Prime Rate and mortgage ARM indexes are still close to zero because of the Fed’s QE2 program of buying back Treasury Bonds.

So inflation is still way below the Fed’s ‘implicit’ target range of 1.5 to 2 percent. That is why the Fed wants to continue with QE2. Right now, the emphasis has to be on creating jobs, and keeping the inflation rate from falling further. For, falling prices mean lower profits for employers, which mean shedding jobs rather than adding them.

Then why are food and energy prices rising, if inflation is still low? Firstly, food prices have been rising because of major droughts in Russia, China and parts of Africa; major bread baskets of the world. And energy prices are rising because of rising energy us from the developing countries—including major population centers like China, India, and Brazil.

This means those prices are totally out of Federal Reserve control. In fact, some energy inflation is good because it speeds up incentives to convert to alternative fuels, which means cleaner energy use and less dependence on Middle East oil.

What about our soaring budget deficit? That is the other reason the Fed is pushing down interest rates. Right now, the costs of borrowing are at record lows. Something like just 10 percent of the federal budget goes to interest payments. So raising interest rates would only increase the budget deficit.

There is more good news on the hiring front. The Labor Department’s latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) said the number of job openings in December was 3.1 million (yellow line on graph), which was little changed from 3.2 million in November. Since the most recent series trough in July 2009, the level of job openings has risen by 0.7 million, or 31 percent. In December, about 4.162 million people lost (or left) their jobs, and 4.184 million were hired (this is the labor turnover in the economy) adding 20 thousand total jobs. Even with the decline in December, thought, job openings (yellow) are up significantly over the last year.

clip_image008

So there is a connection between inflation and interest rates. Rising interest rates are a sign that more money is in circulation—i.e., the demand for its use is rising. And that is a good thing at present. But inflation is more closely connected to employment, and past history says that inflation only becomes a problem when we get close to full employment—which is in the 6 percent range. That last happened in 2006 at the top of the housing and credit bubbles. And we are a long way from that place today.

Harlan Green © 2010