Why Such Restrictive Mortgage Lending?

The Mortgage Corner

Earlier this month, researchers at the Urban Institute’s Housing Finance Policy Center published some of their research on lending standards. Drawing on data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, they found that lower-credit applicants accounted for only 33 percent of all applicants in 2015. That compares to 62 percent in 2006, at the height of the bubble, and 50 percent in 2000, when market conditions were generally considered balanced.

Graph: Urban Institute

What determines a “lower-credit applicant’, according to the Urban Institute? A FICO score below 700, a loan-to-value ratio less than 78 percent, and debt to income ratio less than 30 percent. That means prospective homeowners and borrowers are either easily discouraged, or other factors that tighter credit criteria are at play, since 700 is still a good credit score and even a 10 percent down payment with 45 to 50 percent debt to income ratios usually mean a credit-worthy borrower in today’s housing markets.

Of course it makes sense that borrowers with “less than perfect credit” would have a more difficult time qualifying for a mortgage. But why 7 years into this recovery would so many lower credit applicants still have problems qualifying?

There are a number of factors, including higher home prices, of course. And incomes are not rising as they should even with this low inflation environment, while mortgage rates remain historically low—still below 4 percent for conforming 30-year fixed rates—an incredible boon for prospective homebuyers given the low inflation environment..

In fact, it’s not so much that lending standards are stricter. Rather, thanks to the government ownership of conventional mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, mortgages have become more expensive because of so-called fee addon’s with “less than perfect” credit scores below 700, which Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have tacked on more recently.

Why discourage what are very credit-worthy borrowers in normal times? Costs go up exponentially with credit scores below 720 for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guaranteed mortgages—as much as 2.5 points, which translates to an equivalent 0.625 percent rate increase.

It seems that the US Treasury has been trying to discourage all but the most credit-worthy borrowers, all in the name of down-sizing the GSEs. In fact the Obama Treasury Department has made no secret of wanting to close down Fannie and Freddie, which is why it has been taking all of its profits since a 2012 modification to Treasury’s conservation agreement, rather than allowing them to build up their capital base.

Graph: Calculated Risk

Yet delinquency rates are almost back to historical levels. Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate barely increased to 1.23 percent in November, up from 1.21 percent in October. Big Deal! The serious delinquency rate is down from 1.58 percent in November 2015. But that is close to the long term delinquency rate that is just under 1 percent. The definition of serious delinquency is mortgage loans that are "three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure".  

The Urban Institute’s Laurie Goodman, co-director of the Housing Finance Policy Center, sees the decline in lower-credit applicants as clearly problematic, and symptomatic of an overly-tight mortgage market, although it’s not clear whether would-be applicants are holding back because they are aware they may not qualify, or for some other reason, such as not having enough money for a down payment or losing interest in homeownership.

Earlier Urban analysis suggested that tight lending meant that 1.1 million mortgages that would have been made in 2001 were “killed” – never written – in 2015. The real answer to this problem of what is really a defacto denial of credit to lower income homebuyers is to pry Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the greedy grasp of Treasury and return them to the private marketplace.

There are many forms that could take, but it means Congress and the Trump Administration has to show some initiative.

Harlan Green © 2017

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

New-Home Sales Also Soaring

Financial FAQs

"Sales of new single-family houses in April 2016 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 619,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 16.6 percent above the revised March rate of 531,000 and is 23.8 percent above the April 2015 estimate of 500,000."

We are beginning to see a real recovery in housing inventories with more new home being built, the one element that has been holding back more robust sales, as well as first-timers from entering the housing market.

Graph: Calculated Risk

“Rising home sales combined with tight inventory will translate into increased housing production as we move onward in 2016, especially as job creation continues and mortgage rates remain low,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz.

We are also seeing record low mortgage default rates, another sign that more homeowners are free to either move or refinance their homes.  Strong job creation and a seven-year U.S. economic recovery have helped home owners get in the best shape in years. The number of new foreclosures in the first quarter edged near the lowest level in 17 years, the New York Federal Reserve said Tuesday.

The same was true for other consumer debt. Repayments increased and just 5 percent of all outstanding household debt — student loans, credit cards, auto loans, mortgages, home equity lines of credit - was delinquent in early 2016. That’s the smallest share of delinquencies since 2007, shortly before the onset of the Great Recession.

Graph: Calculated Risk

The bottom line is that more new homes have to be built—almost doubled to 1 million per year in order to catch up with historical demand. Historically, the number of new and existing-home sales was a constant ratio of 6 to 1 existing-homes to new-home sales. That means at the current existing-home sales rate of 5.4 million homes, some 900,000 new homes need to be sold. And they have to be in the more affordable price ranges, which means closer to the current median new-home price of $321,100, or below.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Existing-Home Sales at 8-Year High

The Mortgage Corner

It had to happen.  Why did June existing-home sales jump to an 8-year high? Fewer foreclosures is the short answer, hence more available for sale at market prices. But soaring consumer optimism due to an even better jobs market has to be the driving force causing families to build their nests.

Also, prices are rising to multi-year highs due to supply scarcities. And then there are the demographics, as the new generation is pushing older generations to move up or down, with even baby boomers wanting more retirement living.

Total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 3.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.49 million in June from a downwardly revised 5.32 million in May. Sales are now at their highest pace since February 2007 (5.79 million), have increased year-over-year for nine consecutive months and are 9.6 percent above a year ago (5.01 million).

Graph: Calculated Risk

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, says backed by June's solid gain in closings, this year's spring buying season has been the strongest since the downturn. "Buyers have come back in force, leading to the strongest past two months in sales since early 2007," he said. "This wave of demand is being fueled by a year-plus of steady job growth and an improving economy that's giving more households the financial wherewithal and incentive to buy."

Inventories have dropped to 5 months, which is driving up prices. The median price, up 3.3 percent in the month to $236,400, is already a record. Part of the rise in prices is tied to a lack of distressed sales, at only 8 percent of June's total which is a record low, according to Econoday.

Adds Yun, "June sales were also likely propelled by the spring's initial phase of rising mortgage rates, which usually prods some prospective buyers to buy now rather than wait until later when borrowing costs could be higher."

And that may be an additional factor. Interest rates, though still low, have risen approximately ¼ percent since their most recent lows, with 30-year fixed conforming rates now 3.75 percent for a 1 point origination fee in California.

Total housing inventory³ at the end of June inched 0.9 percent to 2.30 million existing homes available for sale, and is 0.4 percent higher than a year ago (2.29 million). Unsold inventory is at a 5.0-month supply at the current sales pace, down from 5.1 months in May.

"Limited inventory amidst strong demand continues to push home prices higher, leading to declining affordability for prospective buyers," said Yun. "Local officials in recent years have rightly authorized permits for new apartment construction, but more needs to be done for condominiums and single-family homes."

The percent share of first-time buyers fell to 30 percent in June from 32 percent in May, but remained at or above 30 percent for the fourth consecutive month. A year ago, first-time buyers represented 28 percent of all buyers.

This is why housing starts surged nearly 10 percent last month to an annual rate of 1.17 million, just a touch below a post- recession high. Builders were especially active in the Northeast and South that suffered so much from last winter. We need more housing, in other words, as jobs and families continue to grow.

Harlan Green © 2015

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Fannie and Freddie Didn’t Do It!

Financial FAQs

As if further confirmation was needed that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not even a minor cause of the housing bubble and consequent bust, the latest judgment against Nomura Securities for selling fraudulent mortgages to Fannie and Freddie should be icing on the cake; settlements that now total more than $14 billion in fines for almost all the major banks and lending institutions.

The charge is old. Critics, (mainly those caught selling fraudulent loans to Fannie and Freddie) have long maintained that the GSE’s encouraged too many people to buy homes by offering all manner of payment assistance, and even guaranteeing subprime mortgages from the likes of Countrywide Financial (that was subsequently bought by Bank of America).

A U.S. judge on Monday ruled that two more large financial entities, including Nomura Holdings Inc., made false statements in selling mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ahead of the 2008 financial crisis.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan ruled for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in a ruling that could allow the U.S. regulator to recover around $450 million.

This is one more example of how almost all of the major financial institutions jumped on the bandwagon that encouraged the housing bubble—lending money to both qualified and unqualified borrowers and then misrepresenting their quality to the main guarantors of US housing finance.

Cote, who presided over a non-jury trial, said the FHFA was entitled to judgment against Nomura and the Royal Bank of Scotland Plc, which underwrote some of the $2 billion in mortgage-backed securities, in light of misstatements they made in offering documents.

Such originators were the real problem. Nomura Securities is just one of a growing list of mortgage lenders that have had to settle fraud charges that the loans submitted to Fannie and Freddie weren’t the quality loans they had certified—16 at last count totaling more than $14 billion in fines, as we said. Their loans had not in fact conformed or even followed Fannie and Freddie’s qualification standards, including verification of income and even whether they held real jobs, when they sought their guarantee insurance.

The result was the demonization of the GSEs as undercapitalized and incapable of fulfilling their mandate to make housing more affordable to Main Street Americans. I have been writing about the resistance of US Treasury—and maybe White House—to any recapitalization of Fannie and Freddie’s corporations to cushion them from another such housing downturn, corporations that were set up in the 1930s and 40s respectively to encourage home owning.

And in successfully fulfilling their mandate, they were a major factor in creating middle class Americans’ wealth, much of which was destroyed during the Great Recession. FDR’s Home Loan Corporation came to the rescue during the Great Depression, and we should be doing the same for housing in order to aid our recovery from the Great Recession.

Then why does Treasury, and even the White House oppose recapitalizing them, in spite of their now record-breaking profits? Because Treasury seems to believe there is a better alternative. However, that is yet to be seen and the GSEs are guaranteeing more than 60 percent of originations these days, while making the Treasury literally $$billions.

The Federal Housing and Finance Authority has just issued an update on their plans to ‘reform’ the GSEs. It is a proposal to form a Common Securitizing Platform (CSP) to replace competing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac platforms that securitize its mortgage pools.

“The objectives in developing a Single Security are to establish a single, liquid market for the mortgage-backed securities issued by both Enterprises that are backed by fixed-rate loans and to maintain the liquidity of this market over time,” says the FHFA. “Achievement of those objectives would enhance the liquidity of the TBA market and further FHFA’s statutory obligation to ensure the liquidity of the nation’s housing finance markets.”

The question then is what comes next? The Treasury says their overall objective of not recapitalizing Fannie and Freddie is to induce private originators to guarantee a larger majority of mortgages. So will Banks and other private loan originators then step up to the plate and issue pools that can be either purchased or guaranteed by the CSP, which up to now they have been reluctant to do, without the GSEs’ guarantee?

And if the Treasury dissolves the GSEs, as it says it ultimately intends in order to put, “private capital at risk ahead of taxpayers,” can private issuers of said mortgage-backed-securities be the guarantors, without substantially raising their fees and profit margins, which will raise interest rates, as well? There was a reason Fannie and Freddie conforming mortgage rates were so affordable. They had lower capitalization requirements, in part because of the superior quality of their mortgage underwriting standards, and consequent low delinquency rates.

Graph: Calculated Risk

Then who will enforce the very successful underwriting standards now required by Fannie and Freddie that has brought down the default rates close to historical standards? It is the real issue that was exposed in the lawsuits. Who will police the banks and private mortgage originators that the record shows will evade those standards when it suits them?

Harlan Green © 2015

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Mortgage Delinquencies Close to Pre-Recession Lows.

The Mortgage Corner

Calculated Risk reports Black Knight Financial Services (BKFS) released their Mortgage Monitor report for February on Monday. According to BKFS, 5.36 percent of mortgages were delinquent in February, down from 5.56 percent in January. BKFS reported that 1.58 percent of mortgages were in the foreclosure process, down from 2.22 percent in February 2014. This is approaching historical lows for delinquencies, and should mean a very good year for housing.

Graph: Calculated Risk

February’s delinquency rate, while still 17 percent above the pre-crisis norm of 4.6 percent, was down 49 percent from its January 2010 peak of 10.6 percent. And at 1.58 percent, the foreclosure rate remained 175 percent above precrisis norms, but was still down 63 percent from its October 2011 peak, reports Black Knight.

This breaks down as:

· 1,646,000 properties less than 90 days past due, but not in foreclosure.

· 1,067,000 properties that are 90 or more days delinquent, but not in foreclosure.

· 800,000 loans in foreclosure process.

It also means last week’s jump in Pending Home Sales was no fluke, as lower delinquency rates mean more homes with positive equity are increasing housing inventories. The National Association of Realtors Pending Sales Index is at its highest level since June 2013 (109.4), has increased year-over-year for six consecutive months and is above 100 – considered an average level of activity – for the 10th consecutive month.

So what will happen in 2015? Mortgage applications have also jumped, particularly purchase applications, as we said last week. "There was a broad based increase in mortgage applications last week (April 1) relative to the week prior. The increase in purchase volume was led by a nearly 6 percent increase in both conventional and government markets, perhaps signaling that households are finally ready to begin the home-buying season," said Lynn Fisher, MBA's Vice President of Research and Economics.

But that is largely because of still record low interest rates. The Fed wants to begin to raise interest rates sometime this year, but growth has slowed recently, due to the another severe winter, and a soaring dollar value that hurts exports. So the latest words from the Fed Governors are that low interest rates should be around for a while longer.

New York Fed Governor William Dudley said as much recently. “…as Chair Yellen remarked in her most recent press conference, removal of “patient” from the statement does not indicate that we will be “impatient” to begin to normalize monetary policy.  Rather, the timing of normalization will be data dependent and remains uncertain because the future evolution of the economy cannot be fully anticipated.”

The housing market will have a very good year, according to Core Logic’s 2015 housing forecast. “The U.S. economy is poised to grow by close to 3 percent in 2015, generating a 3- to 3.5-million-person gain in employment,” said Core Logic chief economist Frank Nothaft. “This job growth, coupled with very low mortgage interest rates and some easing in credit access, is expected to propel both owner-occupant and rental housing activity this year. This heightened level of housing demand should translate to the best home sales market in eight years.”

Let us hope the Fed remains patient for first-time homebuyers that require affordable loan rates, in particular, and are just now entering the housing market.

Harlan Green © 2015

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

CFPB Releases Borrower Guidelines

The Mortgage Corner

The Consumer Protection Financial Bureau, set up as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act, has just published guidelines for mortgage borrowers to help them get the best possible terms.

Knowing mortgage guidelines and regulations may seem a no-brainer for borrowers, but most don’t research their mortgage options with various direct lenders or brokers, according to the CFPB.

Based on new data in the National Survey of Mortgage Borrowers, a voluntary survey jointly conducted by the CFPB and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, almost half of consumers who take out a mortgage don’t shop prior to filling out an application for a mortgage. Three out of four consumers only apply with one lender or broker. CPFB contends most consumers only get their information from lenders or brokers, who have a stake in the outcome. But many such leads come from referrals by satisfied borrowers. That’s why it’s important to get other opinions.

Graph: The Housing Wire

“Most consumers put substantial effort into considering their differing housing needs,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a speech at The Brookings Institute. “But they do not seem to be as careful or as confident in weighing the economic aspects of the mortgage decision, such as what down payment they can afford or what mortgage terms fit their unique financial needs.”

There are many reasons for this, including convenience. It is now much easier to shop online for mortgage rates and terms than in the past, as sources such as bankrate.com offer comparisons.

There are also the complexities in applying for a mortgage. So-called conforming mortgages that ‘conform’ to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac qualification guidelines have the best rates and terms, but the most rigorous qualification standards. That is why their default and foreclosure rates are now close to long term historical trends.

Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate declined slightly in November to 1.91 percent. The serious delinquency rate is down from 2.44 percent in November 2013, and this is the lowest level since October 2008, says Calculated Risk. The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 5.59 percent.

Freddie Mac, the other conforming mortgage guarantor, also reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate was unchanged in November at 1.91 percent. Freddie's rate is down from 2.43 percent in November 2013, and is at the lowest level since December 2008. Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20 percent.

Graph: Calculated Risk

The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate has fallen 0.53 percentage points over the last year, and at that pace the serious delinquency rate will be under 1 percent in late 2016, the long term trend, as we said—although the rate of decline has slowed recently.

So how do we know where, or how to shop for the best possible terms? Alas, some homework is involved. Because interest rates have declined so low, most prospective borrowers will opt for the 30-year fixed rate, which makes it easy to compare rates and terms. And 30-year conforming fixed rates have dropped to 3.50 percent with 0 points in origination fees in California, for the best credit scores.

Credit scores are extremely important to lenders in today’s post-housing bubble m environment. It has to be at or above a so-called mid-score of 740 (that is, the middle score from the 3 major credit agencies—Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian.)

And stable income is a major requirement, which can be difficult to verify for self-employed borrowers, since it requires 2 years’ federal tax returns, which will be cross-checked with the IRS for accuracy.

But this is the best time to buy or borrow. Home prices are still recovering from the housing bubble, and optimism from major surveys, such as Case-Shiller, is rising. Surveys are now showing that consumers believe they will see housing values continue to rise in 2015.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Mortgage Delinquency and Foreclosure Rates Lowest Since 2007

The Mortgage Corner

The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties decreased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 5.85 percent of all loans outstanding at the end of the third quarter of 2014. This is approaching the historical average of 4.25 percent with those eastern and Midwestern states that conduct judicial foreclosures lagging the mostly western states that conduct Trust Deed auctions in clearing their books of delinquent loans.

The delinquency rate decreased for the sixth consecutive quarter and reached the lowest level since the fourth quarter of 2007. Whereas the delinquency rates for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are even lower—2.05 percent for “seriously delinquent” mortgages more than 90 days late in payments.

Graph: Calculated Risk

So it is another sign of the housing recovery. All areas of distress are lower, and housing prices continue to rise, though more slowly than last year. Housing price for homes with Fannie Mae guaranteed loans are up 5.9 percent YoY, and 6.1 percent for Freddie Mac guaranteed loans.

“Delinquency rates and the percentage of loans in foreclosure fell to their lowest levels since 2007,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s chief economist. “We are now back to pre-crisis levels for most measures. Foreclosure starts were unchanged on a seasonally adjusted basis, but increased slightly in the raw data. Given that this measure reached the lowest level in eight years last quarter, and given the continued decline in delinquency and foreclosure inventory rates, we expect that the increase in the unadjusted starts rate is just regular seasonal fluctuation.”

The problem is mainly in the eastern states that have judicial foreclosures which must be processed through the courts, which is a very time-consuming process. For instance, Nevada is the only non-judicial state in the top 10, and this is partially due to state laws that slow foreclosures (D.C added some new foreclosure mediation requirements).

The top states are New Jersey (7.96 percent in foreclosure, down from 8.10 percent in Q2), Florida (6.12 percent), New York (5.72 percent) and Maine (4.29 percent).  Former bubble states California (1.05 percent) and Arizona (0.85 percent) are now far below the national average by every measure.

Graph: Calculated Risk

This graph that dates from 2006 shows the difference. The blue line charts Judicial foreclosures (blue line) down to 4.20 percent of inventories, while Non-judicial foreclosures (dotted blue line) have fallen to 1.27 percent on inventories.

And interest rates are back to historical lows with ultra-low inflation. Thirty-year conforming fixed rates are now 3.75 percent in California, for instance. And such low inflation could be around for years to come, as there is oversupply in most commodities, including oil, that is feeding the deflationary environment.

This is good news for the housing market and real estate in general, as it makes housing more affordable for even entry-level buyers who have been priced out of the housing market during this recovery.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Retail Sales, Consumer Sentiment Boosting Holiday Cheer

Popular Economics Weekly

Retail Sales are growing again, and U. of Michigan survey of consumer sentiment is also spiking at the right time of year for holiday sales. That’s because job openings and hires in the September JOLTS report are bringing US closer to full employment. This is especially in some high growth areas of the country, such as California’s Silicon Valley, where unemployment rates have dropped to the low 4 percent range in September.

Graph: Calculated Risk

Retail sales ex-gasoline surged by 5.1 percent on a Year-over-Year basis--4.1 percent for all retail sales—which is somewhat misleading because sales aren’t adjusted for inflation, which has been falling. Retail outlets now routinely offer 20 percent discounts for goods of all kinds, except for luxury goods, due to depressed household incomes. So sales volumes’ have probably been rising faster than the indicators.

Fallen incomes have been the overall problem, and the reason for the slow recovery, since lower incomes depress prices which leads to decreased demand for those goods and services. But the latest JOLTS report is heartening. There were 4.7 million job openings on the last business day of September, barely changed from 4.9 million in August, but the Quits and Hiring levels are surging.

Quits are generally voluntary separations initiated by the employee. Therefore, the quits rate can serve as a measure of workers’ willingness or ability to leave jobs, and is a major employment  indicator liked by Fed Chairman Janet Yellen. The number of quits increased from 2.5 million in August to 2.8 million in September. This was the highest level of quits since April 2008. And companies hired 5.03 million people in September, which is the highest number since December 2007, just as the Great Recession started.

The following graph from Calculated Risk shows job openings (yellow line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.

Lastly, the preliminary Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for November was at 89.4, up from 86.9 in October. This was above the consensus forecast of 87.5 and is at the highest level since 2007 in this graph that dates back to 1980.  So we can see that it has yet to climb above 90 to reach sentiment that prevailed during full employment periods that prevailed especially during the 1990s.

Graph: Calculated Risk

So once again, we are seeing the Goldilocks economy at work. It’s not running too hot (high inflation), or too low (there is good job creation). It is household incomes that need to rise, which should happen as we creep towards full employment. Full employment won’t be reached until the unemployment rate is in the 4 percent range these days, given the 11.1 million in underemployed and unemployed workers looking for work or wanting full time jobs.

That’s why most economists aren’t predicting that full employment will be achieved until sometime in 2016.  Guess what else is happening in 2016!

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Existing-Home Sales Highest in Year

The Mortgage Corner

The National Association of Realtors reports total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 2.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.17 million in September from 5.05 million in August. Sales are now at their highest pace of 2014, but still remain 1.7 percent below the 5.26 million-unit level from last September.

Graph: Calculated Risk

That has to be partly due to falling interest rates, with conforming 30-year fixed rates dropping as low as 3.625 percent for a 1 point origination fee in California. But also rents are soaring, up more than 10 percent year-over-year in five large rental markets -- San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, Denver, and Miami.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, says the improved demand for buying seen since the spring has carried into the fall. “Low interest rates and price gains holding steady led to September’s healthy increase, even with investor activity remaining on par with last month’s marked decline,” he said. “Traditional buyers are entering a less competitive market with fewer investors searching for available homes, but may also face a slight decline in choices due to the fact that inventory generally falls heading into the winter.”

Graph: Calculated Risk

Total housing inventory at the end of September (blue line in graph) fell 1.3 percent to 2.30 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 5.3-month supply (red line) at the current sales pace. This is far too few homes available for sale, which means a greater demand for new home construction. Despite fewer homes for sale in September, unsold inventory is still 6.0 percent higher than a year ago, when there were 2.17 million existing homes available for sale.

And housing prices continue to rise, though more slowly than last year. The median existing-home price for all housing types in September was $209,700, which is 5.6 percent above September 2013. This marks the 31^st consecutive month of year-over-year price gains.

Why the falling interest rates? Worries of slower worldwide growth are worrying stock prices. The 10-year Treasury note yield dropped below 2 percent for the first time in 16 months. This has even caused Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer to voice fears that the slowdown in the Eurozone in particular could slow U.S. growth. Why? Because it lowers the demand for U.S. goods and services.

Fischer said in a speech recently that, “if foreign growth is weaker than anticipated, the consequences for the U.S. economy could lead the Fed to remove accommodation more slowly than otherwise.”

Lawrence Yun added, “Economic instability overseas is leading to volatility in the stock market and is causing investors to seek safer bets, which will likely keep interest rates in upcoming weeks hovering near or below where they are now,” said  Yun. “This is welcoming news for consumers looking to buy, although they could temporarily become more cautious by less certain economic conditions.”

Of interest are all-cash sales, which tell us whether the mortgage markets are functioning better, or worse. Fewer all-cash sales generally mean banks are easing their credit standards. All-cash sales were 24 percent of transactions in September, said the NAR, up slightly from August (23 percent) but down from 33 percent in September of last year. Individual investors, who account for many cash sales, purchased 14 percent of homes in September, up from 12 percent last month but below September 2013 (19 percent). Sixty-three percent of investors paid cash in September. 

Distressed homes – foreclosures and short sales – increased slightly in September to 10 percent from 8 percent in August, but are down from 14 percent a year ago, another reason there are fewer all-cash purchases. Seven percent of September sales were foreclosures and 3 percent were short sales. Foreclosures sold for an average discount of 14 percent below market value in September (same as in August), while short sales were discounted 14 percent (10 percent in August). 

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Pending-Home Sales Decline Slightly

The Mortgage Corner

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, fell 1.0 percent to 104.7 in August from 105.8 in July, and is now 2.2 percent below August 2013 (107.1). Despite the slight decline, the index is above 100 – considered an average level of contract activity – for the fourth consecutive month and is at the second-highest level since last August.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said contract signings are holding steady and fewer distressed sales and less investor activity is likely behind August’s modest decline. “Fewer distressed homes at bargain prices and the acknowledgement we’re entering a rising interest rate environment likely caused hesitation among investors last month,” he said. “With investors pulling back, the market is shifting more towards traditional and first-time buyers who rely on mortgages to purchase a home.”

And the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, which covers all nine U.S. census divisions, recorded a 5.6 percent annual gain in July 2014. The 10- and 20-City Composites posted year-over-year increases of 6.7 percent.

Graph: Calculated Risk

Data through July 2014 show a significant slowdown in price increases. Nineteen of the 20 cities saw lower annual returns in July. Las Vegas, Miami and San Francisco were the only cities to report double-digit annual gains. Cleveland’s rate remained unchanged at +0.9% for the 12 months ending July 2014.

Las Vegas rose 12/8 percent, Miami 11 percent, and San Francisco 10.3 percent. The PHSI in the Northeast slipped 3.0 percent to 86.5 in August, but is still 1.6 percent above a year ago. In the Midwest the index fell 2.1 percent to 102.4 in August, and is 7.6 percent below August 2013.

Pending home sales in the South decreased 1.4 percent to an index of 117.0 in August, unchanged from a year ago. The index in the West rose for the fourth consecutive month (2.6 percent) in August to 102.1, but still remains 2.6 percent below August 2013.

The major reason for less investor demand is the fall in foreclosures and delinquent mortgages, as we said. Fannie Mae reported today that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate declined in July to 2.00 percent from 2.05 percent in June. The serious delinquency rate is down from 2.70 percent in July 2013, and this is the lowest level since October 2008.

Freddie Mac also reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate declined in July to 2.02 percent from 2.07 percent in June. Freddie's rate is down from 2.70% in July 2013, and is at the lowest level since January 2009. Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20%.

Graph: Calculated Risk

“The employment outlook for young adults is brightening and their incomes³ finally appear to be rising,” said Yun. “Jobs and income gains will help repay student debt and better position first-time buyers, setting the stage for improved sales growth in upcoming years.” 

In fact, overall consumer incomes are rising. Personal income growth posted a 0.3 percent gain in August, following a 0.2 percent rise in July. The latest number matched expectations for a 0.3 percent advance. The wages & salaries component was even stronger with a 0.4 percent boost, following a 0.2 percent increase the month before.

Graph: Econoday

Personal spending jumped 0.5 percent after no change in July, while there was no increase in the PCE inflation index at all, mainly due to falling gas prices. Strength was in the durables component which jumped 1.8 percent after no change in July. August reflected a jump in auto sales. Nondurable spending declined 0.3 percent after no change in July. Services jumped 0.5 percent in August after being unchanged the month before.

And with interest rates falling again—the 30-yr conforming fixed rate is back to 3.75 percent with 0 origination points—more first-timers in particular can afford to buy homes. We are of course speaking of the 18 to 35-yr olds of the so-called millennial generation who have taken longer to both find jobs and leave their parents’ home.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Existing-Home Sales and Interest Rates

The Mortgage Corner

The National Association of Realtors reported after four consecutive months of gains, existing-home sales slipped in August, as all-cash paying investors retreated from the market. Sales increases in the Northeast and Midwest were outweighed by declines in the South and West. There are fewer bargains that appeal to investors, in other words—such as foreclosures and short sales available.

So it’s now up to genuine home buyers looking for a home to increase sales, and that will happen more frequently as rents continue to skyrocket and vacancies decline. Total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, decreased 1.8 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.05 million in August from a slight downwardly-revised 5.14 million in July. Sales are at the second-highest pace of 2014, but remain 5.3 percent below the 5.33 million-unit level from last August, which was also the second-highest sales level of 2013.

Graph: Calculated Risk

NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun says sales activity remains stronger than earlier in the year, but fell last month. "There was a marked decline in all-cash sales from investors,” he said. "On the positive side, first-time buyers have a better chance of purchasing a home now that bidding wars are receding and supply constraints have significantly eased in many parts of the country.” Yun adds, "As long as solid job growth continues, wages should eventually pick up to steadily improve purchasing power and help fully release the pent-up demand for buying.”

The major reason for less investor demand is the fall in foreclosures and delinquent mortgages, as we said. Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate declined in July to 2.00 percent from 2.05 percent in June. The serious delinquency rate is down from 2.70 percent in July 2013, and this is the lowest level since October 2008.

Freddie Mac also reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate declined in July to 2.02 percent from 2.07 percent in June. Freddie's rate is down from 2.70 percent in July 2013, and is at the lowest level since January 2009. Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20 percent. We are therefore closer to the longer term default rates, as shown in the accompanying graph.

Graph: Calculated Risk

And rental vacancies continue to fall, which means both rising prices, and less available rental units, another incentive for home seekers to buy. The best vacancy survey is by Reis, the apartment info data site. Vacancy was unchanged during the second quarter at 4.1 percent, said Reis, a slight worsening versus last quarter. But over the last twelve months the national vacancy rate has declined by 20 basis points, slightly below the pace of the last few quarters.

“We have been anticipating this slowdown in vacancy compression as demand moderates while supply growth accelerates,” said Reis, but that won’t deter those who study longer term trends from wanting to buy. The national vacancy rate now stands 390 basis points below the cyclical peak of 8.0 percent observed right after the recession concluded in late 2009.

Graph: Calculated Risk

That’s because at 4.1 percent, the national vacancy rate remains low by historical standards. The only time vacancy in the US was lower was during the dot.com boom‐and‐bust days of 1999 and 2000. Asking and effective rents both grew by 0.8 percent during the second quarter. This is an increase from growth during the first quarter which now appears to be just a temporary slowdown, likely due to seasonal factors. Rent growth, though weak by historical standards given such a low vacancy rate, continues to accelerate.

So we seem to have returned to historical levels of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, as well as rental vacancies, which means housing sales should also return to more normal levels. The shortage in inventories is the major problem, at present. This also means lots of pent up demand for new housing, which housing construction and new-home sales must eventually fill.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Pending Sales Up, Mortgage Delinquencies Down

The Mortgage Corner

U.S. home buyers signed more contracts to buy existing homes in July, rebounding from a drop in June. This is in line with declining delinquency and foreclosure rates that portend a healthy real estate market for the rest of this year, and maybe into next year, if interest rates hold at their current lows. Today’s 30-year fixed conforming rate has fallen to 3.75 percent for 1 origination point in California.

The National Association of Realtors' monthly Pending Home Sales index rose 3.3 percent in July over June but is still 2.1 percent below its level in July 2013. It’s rising again because both consumer confidence measures have been rising of late, buoyed by rising incomes and low inflation.

Graph: Econoday

"Interest rates are lower than they were a year ago, price growth continues to moderate and total housing inventory is at its highest level since August 2012," said Lawrence Yun, NAR's chief economist. "The increase in the number of new and existing homes for sale is creating less competition and is giving prospective buyers more time to review their options before submitting an offer."

Graph: Calculated Risk

And consumer sentiment is up in the final August reading, to 82.5 vs 79.2 at mid-month, along with the Conference Board’s Confidence index, the second reading of consumer optimism that is rising this week. The gain is centered in current conditions as it was in Tuesday's consumer confidence report, and underscores the improvement this month in unemployment claims, which once again fell below 300,000 for the second consecutive week. The current conditions component in this report is at 99.8 vs 99.6 at mid-month and 97.4 in final July. A rise in current conditions points to general month-to-month strength for consumer activity.

Graph: Calculated Risk

Lastly, home prices continue to rise and delinquencies to fall. A total of ​​3,785,000 loans were delinquent or in foreclosure in July. This is down from 4,599,000 in July 2013. Calculated Risk reports Black Knight Financial Services (BKFS) released their Mortgage Monitor report for July today. According to BKFS, 5.64 percent of mortgages were delinquent in July, down from 5.70 percent in June. More importantly BKFS reports that 1.85 percent of mortgages were in the foreclosure process, down from 2.82 percent in July 2013.

Both delinquencies and foreclosures are finally approaching historical levels, which means that housing sales—including new-home sales will do the same. The rate of monthly new problem loans has now fallen to 2005-06 levels, reports BKFS. Many foreclosure sales were held up by lengthy court proceedings in many of the eastern and Midwestern state that did judicial sales, rather than the western states with Trust Deed liens that could be auctioned off on courthouse steps.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Restricted Credit Will Impede Housing Recovery

Financial FAQs

As if we need more evidence that the Consumer Protection Finance Bureau and government regulators have listened to the wrong people when drafting their Qualified Mortgage requirements (that lowers the maximum debt-to-income ratio to 43 percent for non-agency mortgages, disallows interest only options and 40-yr amortization for starters), while Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac add huge fees and stricter underwriting criteria to anyone below a 700 credit score (which is almost perfect in today’s trying markets), the latest new-home sales should convince us.

Graph: Calculated Risk

The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in June were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 406 thousand, while May sales were revised down from 504 thousand to 442 thousand, and April sales were revised down from 425 thousand to 408 thousand. Inventories rose to a 5.8-month level from 5.2 months in May.

The National Association of Home Builders tried to put a good face on the numbers. "With continued job creation and economic growth, we are cautiously optimistic about the home building industry in the second half of 2014," said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. "The increase in existing home sales also bodes well for builders, as it is a signal that trade-up buyers can move up to new construction." Regionally, new-home sales were down across the board. Sales fell 20 percent in the Northeast, 9.5 percent in the South, 8.2 percent in the Midwest and 1.9 percent in the West.

But this is not good news for housing advocates so late in the recovery. For one thing, government regulators and the Obama administration are way behind the housing curve in choosing to tighten credit standards long after the problem of too easy credit was solved. The Federal Reserve and regulators have outright banned low teaser rate, negatively amortized,‘liar’ loans, and loans that don’t require income and asset verification. Mortgages delinquencies are down, existing-home sales are back to a 5 million annual sales rate, and record low interest rates should make it easier to qualify.

So why are regulators still chasing phantoms, and continue to punish lenders five years after the housing bubble burst? Instead, it’s time to encourage them to lend some of their record $1 trillion in excess reserves held by the Federal Reserves in MZM accounts (i.e, at zero interest). Without a housing recovery, there will be no substantial economic recovery, say many major economists.

For instance, former Fed Chair Bernanke has said too-tight credit conditions have squeezed both prospective homebuyers and builders. "Why has the recovery in housing been so slow? One important factor is restraints on mortgage credit," Bernanke said in 2012, adding that total outstanding mortgage credit has shrunk by about 13 percent since its peak in 2007.

Just how weak are home sales? Five years after the end of the recession, sales of new single-family homes still remain far below an annual average of more than 770,000 over the 20 years leading up to a 2005 peak, government data show.

Fannie Mae is growing more optimistic this month about U.S. sales of new single-family homes, and now sees 2014 hitting the highest level in seven years. Fannie’s  FNMA July housing-market forecast estimates that sales of new single-family homes will reach 486,000 this year — the most since 2007 — a bit higher than June’s estimate of 478,000, which would have been the greatest since 2008.

However, despite the uptick in the July forecast, over the past year Fannie has slashed its outlook for new-home sales, showing just how disappointing the market’s been in 2014. Back in July 2013, federally controlled Fannie had expected 2014 sales of new single-family homes to hit 588,000.

Rising mortgage rates, a low supply of new homes and unusually poor winter weather each took a bite out of residential sales this year. It’s also been tough for many borrowers to meet lenders’ strict credit standards, as we said. But it is home sales, and new-home sales in particular that has to improve to boost inventory and keep housing prices in the affordable range.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Why the Growth Slowdown—It’s Housing, Stupid

Popular Economics Weekly

Dean Baker, a noted economist with the Center for Economic Policy and Research (NEPR), has probably given the best and most understandable reason for the Great Recession and ultra-slow recovery—it’s the lousy housing market. The economy is growing at slightly over 2 percent, when we would expect 3 percent growth 5 years after the end of the Great Recession.

“The basic story of the Great Recession is about as simple as they come,” says Baker. “The economy was being driven by a housing bubble and the bubble burst. The combination of the loss of housing construction, due to the enormous overbuilding of the bubble years, and the loss of the consumption that had been driven by bubble generated housing wealth, created a gap in annual demand of more than $1 trillion. That's all simple and easy.”

So the weak housing market, even with the Fed doing all it can do to keep interest rates at rock bottom, hasn’t boosted US growth sufficiently to approach full employment. Why? The housing market would be recovering sooner if government was allowed to do more, because of austerity policies prevalent both here and in Europe. And the results are easy to see in this Paul Krugman graph.

Graph: Paul Krugman

Those countries with the lowest growth rates have the most stringent austerity measures—i.e., most drastic budget cuts and highest interest rates when government should be keeping interest rates as low as possible. And they are the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal and Greece, of course. But the US isn’t far behind, in line with France that is having its own budget problems.

What should be done? We know the government has to help, either with mortgage relief (buy up the bad mortgages and hold them until the market improves), or buying the underwater housing as was done during the Great Depression, and selling them back when conditions improved.

The Home Owners’ Loan Corporation was set up in 1933 under the New Deal. It made more than one million loans to homeowners, sometimes bought the underwater homes, and otherwise supported homeowners who were behind on their payments. Sound familiar?

Graph: FHFA

The HARP and HAMP loan programs were current attempts to do the same and they have refinanced 3 million of the 16 million homes guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie, according to The Housing Wire and FHFA, the Federal Housing Finance Authority that supervises Fannie and Freddie.

“…what did economists think would fill a trillion dollar gap in annual spending?” laments Baker. “Of course the government could do it with more spending and/or tax cuts, but since we have a religious cult in Washington that says it is better to keep millions out of work than to run deficits, this was a political impossibility.”

So 8 million more homes are eligible, according to the FHFA, and the White House has done little to promote HARP 3.0, a newer version that would loosen qualification standards to increase eligibility for those behind on their payments, which would allow more homes to be refinanced. It doesn’t look like another New Deal for housing is in the offing.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

So Fannie and Freddie Weren’t the Problem…

Popular Economics Weekly

We are learning just how much mortgage fraud was committed by 17 national and international banks and other financial entities that the Federal Housing Finance Authority (FHFA) originally sued to recover some $200 billion in losses to the GSEs that it regulates, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

This tells us where the real faults lies for the credit bubble that led to the housing bubble.  The once private stock corporations and now wards of the government, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, didn’t precipitate the housing bust.  They weren’t even the main issuers of faulty mortgages that imploded with the Great Recession. It was the federally-supervised commercial banks themselves that misrepresented many of the mortgages it sold to Fannie and Freddie, thereby giving them the cover of AAA rated assets, when they were much closer to junk bond quality.

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan had lowered short term interest rates below what was the inflation rate at that time—some 3 percent—whereas his fed funds rate was as low as 0.5 percent.  (That meant if money was lent at below the inflation rate, it was basically free money because inflation would eat away at the amount owed so that it was actually worth less when paid off, or sold, than the face amount of the debt.)

And banks jumped into the housing bubble that resulted, almost ignoring the most basic lending safeguards from such ‘free’ money, such as verifying income and assets of the borrowers that Fannie and Freddie required.  In other words, Fannie and Freddie guaranteed that nothing was “stated” on the loan application that wasn’t verified.

The GSEs themselves were also at fault for allowing mortgage banks such as Countrywide Financial (acquired by Bank of America) to package and sell Mortgage Backed Securities to Fannie and Freddie that mainly consisted of negatively amortized ‘liar’ loans with very low initial payment rates, and little or no income and asset verification.  But that was a small portion of the defaulted loans, and in fact Fannie and Freddie guaranteed mortgages have far and away the lowest default rates.

Wall Street insiders now believe that up to $50B could be the tab to settle all the pending cases, according to the New York Times.  Some $1.96 Trillion in so-called private-label mortgages were issued by banks from 2005 to 2008 during the height of the housing bubble, according to the latest figures.

As of January, the FHFA has settled six of the private-label RMBS cases, recovering nearly $8 billion for taxpayers.  Whether due to a lack of adequate supervision, or outright fraudulent misrepresentation of the credit quality of those mortgages, these banks sold Fannie and Freddie mortgages that didn’t meet the strict credit standards of the GSEs.

Graph: NY Times

Banks such as JP Morgan Chase ($5.1B), Deutsche Bank ($1.9B) and now Credit Suisse ($885B) have settled, while admitting they had inadequate oversight.  But Bank of America and Goldman Sachs are holding out, so are going to trial sometime in midyear 2014. 

Others that have settled include, GE (Ally Bank), United Bank of Switzerland and Citigroup.  They had failed to prove in federal court that the mortgages underlying their Mortgage Backed Securities sold to Fannie and Freddie were due to the busted housing bubble that caused the loss of some $5 Trillion in real estate values, rather than their faulty underwriting practices.

Twelve of the cases remain, including FHFA’s lawsuits against Barclays Bank (BCS), Bank of America (BAC), Credit Suisse Holdings (CS), First Horizon National Corp., Goldman Sachs & Co. (GS), HSBC North America (HSBC), Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley (MS), Nomura Holding America (NMR), SG Americas (Societe Generale), The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS) and Countrywide Financial Corp.

So don’t blame Fannie and Freddie for wanting to expand home ownership, as those who oppose government ownership or regulation of anything have contended, and seem to have convinced the Obama administration.  They were as much a victim of deceptive lending practices as the borrowers and homeowners who lost out due to the resulting Great Recession.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

2014 Mortgage Volumes (and Delinquencies) Lower

The Mortgage Corner

It looks like the housing market still has to play catch up in 2014. Both mortgage volume and existing-home sales have declined drastically. But new-home sales and housing construction have picked up, even with the Polar weather, which should add to depleted inventories bought up during the ultra-low interest rates in 2013.

But recent higher interest rates are having an effect, so we will have to wait for the spring thaw to know if consumers have the means to continue buying homes.

“In January, we saw origination volume continue to decline to its lowest point since 2008, with prepayment speeds pointing to further drops in refinance-related originations,” said Herb Blecher, senior vice president of Black Knight Financial Services’ Data & Analytics division, formerly LPS Data & Analytics.

Graph: LPS/Calculated Risk

One can see from the graph that originations in Q4 2005 were equally divided between Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac conforming and private label mortgages, whereas today Fannie/Freddie originate almost all conventional mortgages. Banks have not begun to originate and sell their own products yet, in other words.

This is while mortgage delinquencies continue to fall. The January 2014 overall delinquency rate fell to 6.27 percent and foreclosure rate to 2.35 percent. This meant 4,315,000 million were still in trouble, down from 5,208,000 in January 2013. That’s still a lot of homes in trouble, folks, and is contributing to the lowered inventories, since these borrowers have a much harder time either refinancing or selling their homes.

“Overall originations were down almost 60 percent year-over-year, with HARP volumes (according to the most recent FHFA report) down 70 percent over the same period. (The HARP loan program allows home owners to refinance at today’s rates, even if their loans are underwater, i.e., have negative equity.) These declines are largely tied to the increased mortgage interest rate environment, which is having a significant impact on the number of borrowers with incentive to refinance. A high-level view of this refinancible population shows a decline of about 13 percent just over the last two months,” said Blecher.

Graph: Calculated Risk

“Of course, in addition to higher interest rates, a good deal of this decline can be attributed to the fact that a majority of those who could refinance at historically low rates in recent years already have, and we see a similar dynamic in terms of HARP-eligible loans,” continued Blecher.. “The volume of HARP refinances over the past year has driven this population down to about 700,000 loans in January 2014, as compared to over 2.3 million at the same time last year. From a geographic perspective, outside of Florida and Nevada, we see the Midwestern states of Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and Ohio have among the highest percentage of HARP eligibility.”

We see, therefore, the need for more new homes, but also housing’s continued price and value appreciation to bring more of those delinquent homes back on the market. And that depends on whether new Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen will support lower interest rates.

But she continues to maintain QE3 purchases will be lower in months to come, and that is the reason for higher mortgage rates, which are tied to Treasury Bond yields. So she is walking a fine line between deficit hawks and those who believe the housing market is not yet fully recovered. Let us hope she realizes that the housing market still needs such low interest rates to fully recover.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Consumer Debts Returning to ‘Normal’

Popular Economics Weekly

The NY Fed released their 2013 Q4 Household Debt and Credit Report. The report showed that total household debt is 9.1 percent below the Q3 2008 peak. Mortgage debt is down 13.4 percent from the peak, and Home Equity revolving debt is down 25.9 percent.

This is even though aggregate consumer debt increased by $241 billion in the fourth quarter, the largest quarter-to-quarter increase since 2007, said the NY Fed report. More importantly, between 2012:Q4 and 2013:Q4, total household debt rose $180 billion, marking the first four-quarter increase in outstanding debt since 2008.

Calculated Risk

Does this mean the household deleveraging of debt that has held down consumer spending since the Great Recession is over? Are consumers opening up their wallets finally, and will this drive increased consumer spending and so GDP growth this year?

Barron’s Gene Epstein and Applied Global Macro Research (AGMR) economists believe so. AGMR projects 4 percent in economic output this year and next, arguing that future demand for housing will also boost consumer spending by creating jobs in the many ancillary industries that service housing. This is far above the Fed’s FOMC prediction of 2.8 to 3.4 percent GDP growth through 2015. It also means unemployment has to fall below 6 percent, and the Fed will begin to raise their overnight rate to 0.25 percent from its current 0 percent.

But AGMR’s report doesn’t take into account the sharp decline in federal and local government spending, which has been a drag on growth since 2009. It would have to pick up as well, in my opinion. This is happening in states like California, whose budget is now in surplus, but not at the federal level, in spite of the $1.1 trillion budget agreement for the rest of this fiscal year.

As net household borrowing resumes, it is interesting to see who is driving these balance changes, and to compare some of today’s patterns with those of the boom period. This will help to determine how sustainable is such consumer spending, and so economic growth and job creation.

Auto and student loans have led the way and been growing for some time, while overall debt continued to fall. But in 2013, the increased credit card and mortgage debt among the young and the riskless has led to a turnaround in the trajectory of overall debt. This was the case in the comparison in debt with 2005, and is still the case today. It is the under 30-year olds that are borrowing and spending the most.

 

Graph: NY Federal Reserve

And we believe it is the below-30 cohort that will comprise most of the increased demand for housing, as household formation is predicted to pick up above 1 million per year for the rest of this decade, according to the 2013 Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies’ State of the Nation’s Housing report.

“With rising home prices helping to revive household balance sheets and expanding residential construction adding to job growth, the housing sector is finally providing a much needed boost to the economy,” says Eric S. Belsky, Managing Director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies. “But long-term vacancies are at elevated levels in a number of places, millions of owners are still struggling to make their mortgage payments, and credit conditions for homebuyers remain extremely tight.”

So as always, the key will be pent-up demand for housing and consumer goods that has been constrained since 2009, due mainly to the mountain of debt that has now been reduced to more manageable levels. But government has to be included in any growth projections, and any boost in government spending is still in question.

Harlan Green © 2014

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen